TABLE OF CONTENTS

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
SCHEDULE 14A
Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(Amendment No. )
Filed by the Registrant ☒     Filed by a Party other than the Registrant ☐
Check the appropriate box:

Preliminary Proxy Statement

Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2))

Definitive Proxy Statement

Definitive Additional Materials

Soliciting Material Pursuant to §240.14a-12
BRIXMOR PROPERTY GROUP INC.
(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)
(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if Other Than the Registrant)
Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):

No fee required.

Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11.
(1)
Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:
(2)
Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:
(3)
Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):
(4)
Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:
(5)
Total fee paid:

Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.

Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing.
(1)
Amount Previously Paid:
(2)
Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:
(3)
Filing Party:
(4)
Date Filed:

TABLE OF CONTENTS
[MISSING IMAGE: lg_brixmor-reg.jpg]

 

March 26, 2018

16, 2020

Dear Fellow Stockholders:

Please join us for Brixmor Property Group Inc.’s Annual Meeting of Stockholders on Tuesday, May 8, 2018,April 28, 2020, at 9:00 a.m. (Eastern Daylight Time) at. Due to the Grand Hyatt New York, 109 East 42nd Street at Grand Central Terminal, New York, New York 10017 in the Regency Room.

As permitted by the rulesemerging public health impact of the Securitiescoronavirus outbreak (COVID-19) and Exchange Commission,to support the health and well-being of our stockholders, this year’s Annual Meeting will be held in a virtual meeting format only. You will be able to attend the Annual Meeting virtually and vote and submit questions during the virtual Annual Meeting by visitingwww.viewproxy.com/brixmor/2020.

As in prior years, we are pleased to be furnishing our proxy materials to stockholders primarily over the Internet. We believe this process expedites the stockholders’ receipt of the materials, lowers the costs of the Annual Meeting and conserves natural resources. We sent to stockholders of record at the close of business on March 5, 2018February 12, 2020 a Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials. The notice contains instructions on how to access our proxy statement, 2019 annual report to stockholders and annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2019, and how to vote online. If you would like to receive a printed copy of our proxy materials instead of downloading a printable version from the Internet, please follow the instructions for requesting such materials included in the notice.

The matters to be acted upon at the Annual Meeting are described in detail in the accompanying notice of the Annual Meeting and the proxy statement. We may also report on other matters of current interest to our stockholders.

Please use this opportunity to contribute to our company by voting on the matters to come before this Annual Meeting. Stockholders who hold shares in their own name through our transfer agent, Computershare, can vote online or by telephone. To vote online or by telephone, follow the instructions for online voting contained within your Annual Meeting materials.on the following page. In addition, if you have requested or received a paper copy of the proxy materials, you can vote by completing, dating, signing and returning the proxy card sent to you in the envelope accompanyingwith the proxy materials. Voting online, by telephone or by returning the proxy card does not deprive you of your right to attend the virtual Annual Meeting and to vote your shares in person.at the virtual Annual Meeting. If you do attend the Annual Meeting and wish to vote in person,at that time, you may revoke your proxy at or prior to the Annual Meeting.

Thank you for your continued support of Brixmor Property Group Inc.

Sincerely,

 
[MISSING IMAGE: sg_jamesm-taylor.jpg]
[MISSING IMAGE: sg_john-schreiber.jpg]
James M. Taylor
Jr.
John G. Schreiber
Chief Executive Officer and PresidentJohn G. Schreiber
Chairman of the Board

BRIXMOR PROPERTY GROUPï2020 PROXY STATEMENTïPAGE 1


PROXY VOTING METHODS

>PROXY VOTING METHODS

If at the close of business on March 5, 2018,February 12, 2020, you were a stockholder of record, you may authorize a proxy to vote in accordance with your instructions through the Internet,online, by telephone or, if you have requested or received a paper copy of the proxy materials by mail, by mail, or you may vote in person at the virtual Annual Meeting. For shares held through a broker, bank or other nominee, you may authorize a proxy by submitting voting instructions to your broker, bank or other nominee. To reduce our administrative and postage costs, we ask that you authorize a proxy through the Internetonline or by telephone, both of which are available 24 hours a day. You may revoke your proxies at the times and in the manners described on page 369 of the proxy statement.

If you are a stockholder of record or hold shares through a broker, bank or other nominee and are voting by proxy, your proxy must be received by 11:59 p.m. on May 7, 2018April 27, 2020 to be counted.

To authorize a proxy if you are a stockholder of record:

BY INTERNET

Go to the website www.AALvote.com.BRX and follow the instructions, 24 hours a day, seven days a week.

You will need the control number included on your Notice of Internet Availability or proxy card to obtain your records and to create an electronic voting instruction form.
BY TELEPHONE

From a touch-tone telephone, dial 1-866-804-9616 and follow the recorded instructions, 24 hours a day, seven days a week.

You will need the control number included on your Notice of Internet Availability or proxy card in order to vote by telephone.
BY MAIL

Mark your selections on the proxy card.

Date and sign your name exactly as it appears on your proxy card form.

Mail the proxy card in the enclosed postage-paid envelope.

BY INTERNETGo to the websitewww.AALvote.com/BRX and follow the instructions, 24 hours a day, seven days a week.
You will need the virtual control number included on your Notice of Internet Availability or proxy card in order to vote online.
BY TELEPHONEFrom a touch-tone telephone, dial 1-866-804-9616 and follow the recorded instructions, 24 hours a day, seven days a week.
You will need the virtual control number included on your Notice of Internet Availability or proxy card in order to vote by telephone.
BY MAILMark your selections on the proxy card.
Date and sign your name exactly as it appears on your proxy card form.
Mail the proxy card in the enclosed postage-paid envelope.

YOUR VOTE IS IMPORTANT TO US. THANK YOU FOR VOTING.

If you hold your shares in street name, you may also submit voting instructions to your broker, bank or other nominee. In most instances, you will be able to do this over the Internet,online, by telephone or by mail. Please refer to information from your broker, bank, or other nominee on how to submit voting instructions.


[MISSING IMAGE: lg_brixmor-reg.jpg]

BRIXMOR PROPERTY GROUP INC.

ï2020 PROXY STATEMENTïPAGE 2

Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholders
TIME

>NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS

TIME9:00 a.m. (Eastern Daylight Time) on Tuesday, May 8, 2018April 28, 2020
PLACEGrand Hyatt New York
109 East 42nd Street at Grand Central Terminal
New York, New York 10017
Regency Room
PLACEDue to the emerging public health impact of the coronavirus outbreak (COVID-19) and to support the health and well-being of our stockholders, this year’s Annual Meeting will be held in a virtual meeting format only.  You can virtually attend the live webcast of the Annual Meeting atwww.viewproxy.com/brixmor/2020.  For more information, see “General Information—How do I attend and vote shares at the virtual Annual Meeting?”
ITEMS OF BUSINESS
1.
To elect eightthe nine directors named in this proxy statement to serve until our next annual meeting of stockholders and until their successors are duly elected and qualify.
2.
To consider and vote on a proposal to ratify the appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for 2018.
2020.

3.

To consider and vote on, on a non-binding advisory basis, a resolution to approve the compensation paid to our named executive officers, as described in the enclosed proxy statement.

4.    To consider and vote on, on a non-binding advisory basis, a resolution determining the frequency of future non-binding advisory votes to approve the compensation paid to our named executive officers.

4.
5.    To transact such other business as may properly come before the Annual Meeting and any adjournments or postponements thereof.
RECORD DATEYou may vote at the Annual Meeting, or any adjournments or postponements thereof, if you were a stockholder of record at the close of business on March 5, 2018.February 12, 2020.
VOTING BY PROXYTo ensure your votes are cast, you may authorize a proxy over the Internet,online, by telephone or, if you have requested or received a paper copy of the proxy materials by mail, by completing, signing and returning your paper proxy card by mail. Internet and telephone voting procedures are described on the preceding page, in the General Information section beginning on page 165 of the proxy statement and on the proxy card.
By Order of the Board of Directors,
 
Steven F. Siegel
Executive Vice President, General Counsel & Secretary
By Order of the Board of Directors,
[MISSING IMAGE: sg_steven-siegel.jpg]
Steven F. Siegel
Executive Vice President, General Counsel & Secretary

This Notice of Annual Meeting and proxy statement are being distributed or made available, as the case may be, on or aboutMarch 26, 2018.


16, 2020.

BRIXMOR PROPERTY GROUPï2020 PROXY STATEMENTïPAGE 3

Important Notice Regardingnotice regarding the Availabilityavailability of Proxy Materials for the Annual Meeting of Stockholders to Be Heldbe held on May 8, 2018April 28, 2020::

Our proxy statement, 2019 annual report to stockholders, and annual reportAnnual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2019 will be available at www.viewproxy.com/brixmor/20182020 beginning on or about March 26, 2018.16, 2020. As permitted by the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”), the Company is sending a Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials (the “Notice”) to all stockholders of record. All stockholders will have the ability to access theour proxy statement, 2019 annual report to stockholders, and the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 20172019 as filed with the SEC on February 12, 2018 (the “Annual Report”)10, 2020 on a website referred to in the Notice or to request a printed set of these materials at no charge. Instructions on how to access these materials over the Internetonline or to request a printed copy may be found in the Notice.

In addition, any shareholderstockholders may request to receive proxy materials in printed form by mail or electronically by email on an ongoing basis. Choosing to receive future proxy materials by email will save the Company the cost of printing and mailing documents to shareholdersstockholders and will reduce the environmental impact of annual meetings on the environment.meetings. A shareholder’sstockholder’s election to receive proxy materials by email will remain in effect until the shareholderstockholder terminates it.


Table of Contents
Page
1
5
5
10
10
11
11
12
12
12
13
14
14
14
14
15
15
16
17
18
18
20
20
21
22
22
30
32
33
34
34
35
37
37
37
37
40
41
42
43
45
46
47
48
49
50

BRIXMOR PROPERTY GROUP INC.

450 LexingtonAvenue

New York, New York 10017

Telephone: (212) 869-3000

PROXY STATEMENT

Annual Meeting of Stockholders May 8, 2018April 28, 2020 9:0000 a.m. (Eastern Daylight Time)(eastern daylight time)

This proxy statement is being furnished by and on behalf of the boardBoard of directorsDirectors of Brixmor Property Group Inc. in connection with the solicitation of proxies to be voted at the 20182020 annual meeting of stockholders. This proxy statement and our 20172019 annual report to stockholders will be available atwww.viewproxy.com/brixmor/20182020beginning beginning on or about March 26, 2018.16, 2020.

BRIXMOR PROPERTY GROUPï2020 PROXY STATEMENTïPAGE 4

>TABLE OF CONTENTS

Page
Proxy Statement Summary6
2019 Business Highlights8
Corporate Responsibility9
Proposal No. 1 – Election of Directors12
Director Nominees13
The Board of Directors and Certain Governance Matters18
Director Independence and Independence Determinations19
Board Structure19
Board Committees20
Oversight of Risk Management23
Committee Charters and Corporate Governance Guidelines23
Executive Sessions23
Stock Ownership Guidelines23
Code of Business Conduct and Ethics and Code For Senior Financial Officers24
Director Nomination Process25
Communications With the Board27
Executive Officers of the Company27
Proposal No. 2 – Ratification of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm29
Proposal No. 3 – Non-Binding Vote on Executive Compensation31
Proposal No. 4 – Non-Binding Vote on Frequency of Stockholder Votes on Executive Compensation32
Report of the Audit Committee33
Report of the Compensation Committee33
Compensation of Our Executive Officers and Directors34
Compensation Discussion and Analysis34
Executive Compensation Tables48
Compensation of Directors56
Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation57
Pay Ratio58
Ownership of Securities59
Delinquent Section 16(a) Reports60
Review, Approval, or Ratification of Transactions with Related Persons61
Related Person Transactions61
Equity Compensation Table62
Stockholder Proposals for the 2021 Annual Meeting63
Householding of Proxy Materials64
Other Business64
General Information65
Appendix – Definitions and Reconciliations of Non-GAAP Performance MeasuresA-1

BRIXMOR PROPERTY GROUPï2020 PROXY STATEMENTïPAGE 5

Why am I being provided with these materials?

>PROXY STATEMENT SUMMARY

STOCKHOLDER VOTING MATTERS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

ProposalBoard
Recommendation
Page
Proposal No. 1 – Election of DirectorsFor12
Proposal No. 2 – Ratification of Independent Registered Public Accounting FirmFor29
Proposal No. 3 – Non-Binding Vote on Executive CompensationFor31
Proposal No. 4 – Non-Binding Vote on Frequency of Stockholder Votes On Executive CompensationOne Year32

BRIXMOR PROPERTY GROUPï2020 PROXY STATEMENTïPAGE 6

We

NOMINEES FOR ELECTION TO THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS IN 2020

The following table provides information about the nine candidates who have made these proxy materials availablebeen nominated for election to you via the Internet or, upon your request, have delivered printed versions of these proxy materials to you by mail in connection with the solicitation by theour Board of Directors (the “Board”) of Brixmor Property Group Inc., a Maryland corporation (the “Company”), of proxies toDirectors. Additional information regarding each nominee’s specific experience, qualifications, attributes and skills can be voted at our Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held on May 8, 2018 (“Annual Meeting”), and at any postponements or adjournments of the Annual Meeting. Directors, officers and other Company employees also may solicit proxies by telephone or otherwise. Brokers, banks and other nominees will be requested to solicit proxies or authorizations from beneficial owners and will be reimbursed for their reasonable expenses. You are invited to attend the Annual Meeting and vote your shares in person. The Annual Meeting will be held at 9:00 a.m. Eastern Daylight Time at the Grand Hyatt New York, 109 East 42nd Street at Grand Central Terminal, New York, New York 10017 in the Regency Room. For directions to the Annual Meeting you may contact our Secretary at Brixmor Property Group Inc., 450 Lexington Avenue, New York, New York 10017.

What am I voting on?
There are three proposals to be considered and voted on at the Annual Meeting:

found under Proposal No. 1:   Election of eight1. Upon election, these directors to servewill hold office until our next annual meeting of stockholders and until their successors are duly elected and qualify. These directors will hold the committee memberships as follows:

«= Committee Chair   Committee Membership
  l = Committee Member

 

Board Member

AgeDirector
Since
 AuditCompensationNominating &
Corporate
Governance

James M. Taylor Jr.

Chief Executive Officer and President, Brixmor Property Group, Inc.

532016    

John G. Schreiber

Director and Chairman of the Board

President, Centaur Capital Partners, Inc.

732013  ll

Michael Berman

Former Chief Financial Officer, GGP, Inc.

622013 «  

Julie Bowerman

Chief Global Digital, Consumer and Customer Experience Officer, Kellogg Company

512019   l

Sheryl M. Crosland

Former Managing Director and Retail Sector Head, JP Morgan Investment Management

672016 l  

Thomas W. Dickson

Former Chief Executive Officer, Harris Teeter

642015  l 

Daniel B. Hurwitz

Founder and Chief Executive Officer, Raider Hill Advisors, LLC

562016  l 

William D. Rahm

Senior Managing Director, Centerbridge Partners, L.P.

412013  «l

Gabrielle Sulzberger

General Partner, Rustic Canyon/Fontis Partners, L.P.

592015 l «

BRIXMOR PROPERTY GROUPï2020 PROXY STATEMENTïPAGE 7


Proposal No. 2:   Ratification

>2019 BUSINESS HIGHLIGHTS

Brixmor Property Group continued to execute on its self-funded plan to drive sustainable growth in cash flow and intrinsic value. Our best-in-class leasing and operating platform and disciplined reinvestment and capital recycling programs drove strong operating and financial results in 2019 and have created significant momentum into 2020 and beyond. Importantly, we remained focused on improving the social, economic and environmental well-being of our tenants, our centers and our employees, and, as always, we are guided by our mission to be the “center of the appointmentcommunities we serve.” Some of Deloitte & Touche LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm2019 highlights include the following:

PORTFOLIO

13M

Square feet of leases
executed at 11% rent
spreads on
comparable space

$16.52

 Record high new
lease ABR PSF; 11%
increase y/y

32%

New lease rent
spreads on
comparable space

86.2%

Record high small
shop occupancy, up
50bps y/y

INVESTMENT ACTIVITY 

$162M

Of reinvestment
projects stabilized at
an average
incremental return of
10% 

~$110M

Of incremental value
created from
reinvestment projects
stabilized in 2019

$413M

Active reinvestment
pipeline providing
strong visibility on
future growth

>$300M

Of dispositions
completed while
acquiring $79M of
assets and
repurchasing $15M of
stock 

FINANCIAL / CAPITAL STRUCTURE / LIQUIDITY

3.4%

Same Property NOI
growth*

$1.14

Annual dividend per
share, up 2% from
2018

$750M

Of senior notes issued;
No remaining
maturities until 2022

Positive

Outlook received on
our credit ratings from
Fitch Ratings and
Moody’s Investor
Services

* See Appendix for 2018.definition of Same Property NOI and a reconciliation to net income, the most comparable GAAP measure.

BRIXMOR PROPERTY GROUPï2020 PROXY STATEMENTïPAGE 8


Proposal No. 3:   Approval, on a non-binding advisory basis,

>

CORPORATE RESPONSIBILITY

OPERATING IN A SOCIALLY RESPONSIBLE MANNER

We believe that prioritizing the well-being of all our stakeholders is critical to delivering consistent, sustainable growth. As such, our Corporate Responsibility strategy is driven by creating partnerships that improve the social, economic and environmental well-being of our tenants, our centers and our employees and is guided by our mission to be the “centers of the compensation paidcommunities we serve.”

Our Board of Directors oversees our corporate responsibility initiatives to ensure that we continue to demonstrate our named executive officers, as describedstrong commitment to operating in this proxy statement.

Whoan environmentally and socially responsible manner. Additional information regarding our Corporate Responsibility strategy can be found in our Corporate Responsibility Report athttps://www.brixmor.com/why-brixmor/corporate-responsibility.

ENVIRONMENTAL RESPONSIBILITY

 We continue to make meaningful progress against our established long- term targets to mitigate our environmental impact, including through reductions in electric and water usage and greenhouse gas emissions, conversions to LED lighting, and installations of electric vehicle charging stations. We also partner with our tenants to achieve our sustainability goals through green lease provisions which facilitate the future installation of solar panels, providing tenants with lower-cost on-site renewable energy systems. As a result of our efforts, we have been recognized by GRESB as a Green Star recipient and by the Institute for Market Transformation and U.S. Department of Energy Better Buildings Alliance as a Green Lease Leader at the highest Gold level.
 

COMMUNITY CONNECTIVITY

Our ongoing commitment to sustainability is entitledalso evident in our approach to vote?

Stockholders asvalue-enhancing reinvestment activity, which transforms properties to meet the needs of the closecommunities we serve through strategic repositioning and redevelopment activity, executed with a focus on resource efficiency and energy management. Additionally, we work to provide welcoming, safe and attractive retail centers for our tenants and their customers to gather, connect and engage, both within stores at our centers and in public spaces throughout our Portfolio.

BRIXMOR PROPERTY GROUPï2020 PROXY STATEMENTïPAGE 9

We further support our communities by hosting local events, volunteering, and providing aid in times of businessneed. We collaborate with our tenants through proactive property management and ongoing tenant coordination, and we continually monitor our success through the use of tenant engagement surveys.

Panama City, Florida

Panama City Square and 23rd Street Station served as staging areas for emergency workers and aid following Hurricane Michael in 2018.

Brixmor’s Disaster Assistance Recovery Team was onsite within 24 hours to assess the damage and work to quickly and efficiently reopen our centers to support the community.

 

The center hosted a “Stronger Together” event on March 5, 2018 (the “Record Date”), may vote at the Annual Meeting, or any postponement or adjournment thereof. As of that date, there were 303,819,420 shares of common stock outstanding. You have one vote for each share of common stock held by you asone-year anniversary of the Record Date,hurricane to celebrate the community’s resilience and Brixmor partnered with the city to replant hundreds of trees.

Houston, Texas

Braes Oaks Center, located in the neighborhood of Meyerland, was hit by devastating floods in 2017 following Hurricane Harvey.

Since that time, the center has hosted ongoing neighborhood events including shares:the Braeswood Farmers Market & Braeswood Food Truck Park, to bring back a sense of community to Meyerland residents.


 

Held directly in your name as “stockholder

“I’m really excited about the future of record” (also referred to as “registered stockholder”);


Held for you in an account with a broker, bank or other nominee (shares held in “street name”). Street name holders generally cannot vote their shares directlyMeyerland, and instead must instruct the broker, bank or other nominee how to vote their shares; and

Held for you by us as restricted shares (whether vested or non-vested) under any of our stock incentive plans.
1

What constitutes a quorum?
The presence in person or by proxy of stockholders entitled to cast a majority of all the votes entitled to be cast at the Annual Meeting on any matter will constitute a quorum to transact business at the Annual Meeting. Stockholders who properly authorize a proxy but who instruct their proxy holder to abstain from voting on one or more matters are counted as present and entitled to vote for purposes of determining a quorum. Shares represented by “broker non-votes,” described below, also are counted as present and entitled to vote for purposes of determining a quorum. However, as described below under “How are votes counted?,” if you hold your shares in street name and do not provide voting instructions to your broker, bank or other nominee, your shares will not be voted on any proposal on which your broker, bank or other nominee does not have discretionary authority to vote (a “broker non-vote”).
What is a “broker non-vote”?
A broker non-vote occurs when shares held by a broker, bank or other nominee are not voted with respect to a proposal because (1) the broker, bank or other nominee has not received voting instructions from the stockholder who beneficially owns the shares and (2) the broker, bank or other nominee lacks the authority to vote the shares at his/her discretion. Under current New York Stock Exchange interpretations that govern broker non-votes, Proposal Nos. 1 and 3 are considered non-discretionary matters and a broker, bank or other nominee will lack the authority to vote shares at his/her discretion on such proposals. Proposal No. 2 is considered a discretionary matter and a broker, bank or other nominee will be permitted to exercise his/her discretion.
How many votes are required to approve each proposal?
The affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast will be required to approve each proposal at the Annual Meeting. While the vote on executive compensation (Proposal No. 3) is advisory in nature and non-binding, the Board will review the voting results and expects to take them into consideration when making future decisions regarding executive compensation.
How are votes counted?
You may instruct your proxy to vote “FOR” or “AGAINST” or to “ABSTAIN” with respect to each of the proposals. Abstentions and broker non-votes will have no effect on the outcome of the proposals.
If you properly authorize a proxy (whether by internet, telephone or mail) without specifying voting instructions on any matter to be considered at the Annual Meeting, the proxy holders will vote your shares accordingstuff like this really helps bring people back to the Board’s recommendation on that matterneighborhood,” said Cathleen Fishel, Meyerland resident.

HUMAN CAPITAL MANAGEMENT

We are also highly committed to being a responsible employer and in accordancecreating and sustaining a positive work environment and corporate culture characterized by high levels of employee engagement, growth and development, and health and wellness. We seek to attract and retain diverse and talented professionals who align with our cultural tenets of integrity, accountability, inclusion and trust. We empower our employees to think and act like owners, we provide training to help them succeed, and we foster interactions between our employees and the discretion of the holders of the proxy with respect to any other matters that may be brought before the Annual Meeting. The Board has recommended a vote “FOR” each director nominee listed herein and “FOR” Proposals Nos. 2 and 3.

Who will count the vote?
Representatives of Alliance Advisors will tabulate the votes, and representatives of Alliance Advisors willcommunities we serve as inspectors of election.
How does the Board recommend that I vote?
Our Board recommends that you vote your shares:

“FOR” each of the nominees for election as directors set forth in this proxy statement.

“FOR” the ratification of the appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for 2018.

“FOR” the approval, on a non-binding, advisory basis, of the compensation paid to our named executive officers, as described in this proxy statement.
2

How do I authorize a proxy to vote my shares without attending the Annual Meeting?
If you are a stockholder of record, you may authorize a proxy to vote on your behalf at the Annual Meeting. Specifically, you may authorize a proxy:

By Internet—If you have Internet access, you may authorize your proxy by going to www.AALvote.com.BRX and by following the instructions on how to complete an electronic proxy card. You will need the control number included on your Notice of Internet Availability or proxy card in order to vote by Internet.create value for all stakeholders. We believe this approach creates collaborative, skilled and motivated teams. We monitor our performance through recurring employee engagement surveys and utilize the results from such surveys to continually improve our organization.

53%

Female
employees 

~10%

Employees promoted
in 2019 

28%

Of new hires from
referrals 

BRIXMOR PROPERTY GROUPï2020 PROXY STATEMENTïPAGE 10

We offer our employees and their families comprehensive health and wellness benefits, including, but not limited to, maternity, paternity, adoption leave, flexible work hours, fitness challenges and health fairs.

We also encourage our employees to advance their personal and professional development through a variety of means.

·Personal development accounts – time off and reimbursement to support personal and professional growth
·Big Brain events – company-wide seminars led by outside experts on diverse topics
·Professional licensure reimbursement and tuition assistance
·Development programs for recent graduates
·Online webinar courses

Celebrating Success

Acknowledging outstanding efforts and ingenuity through established Company awards:

·Tony Deering Leadership award

·Our Center Is You award

·Find A Better Way award

·Annual Top Leasing Professional


By Telephone—If you have access

INVESTOR ENGAGEMENT

We engage in proactive outreach with our investors to a touch-tone telephone, you may authorize your proxy by dialing 1-866-804-9616communicate our operational strategy and by following the recorded instructions. You will need the control number included on your Notice of Internet Availability or proxy card in order to vote by telephone.


By Mail—If you have requested or received a paper copy of the proxy materials by mail, you may authorize your proxy by mail by completing, signing and dating the enclosed proxy card where indicated and by mailing or otherwise returning the card in the envelope that has been provided to you. You should sign your name exactly as it appears on the proxy card. If you are signing in a representative capacity (for example, as guardian, executor, trustee, custodian, attorney or officer of a corporation), indicate your name and title or capacity.
If you hold your shares in street name, you may submit voting instructions to your broker, bank or other nominee. In most instances, you will be able to do this over the Internet, by telephone or by mail. Please refer to information from your broker, bank, or other nominee on how to submit voting instructions.
Internet and telephone voting facilities will close at 11:59 p.m. on May 7, 2018 for the voting of shares held by stockholders of record or held in street name.
Mailed proxy cards with respect to shares held of record or in street name must be received no later than May 7, 2018.
How do I vote my shares in person at the Annual Meeting?
First, you must satisfy the requirements for admission to the Annual Meeting (see below). Then, if you are a stockholder of record and prefer to vote your shares at the Annual Meeting, you must bring proof of identification along with your Notice of Internet Availability or proof of ownership. You may vote shares held in street name at the Annual Meeting only if you obtain a signed proxy from the record holder (for example, your broker, bank or other nominee) giving you the right to vote the shares.
Even if you plan to attend the Annual Meeting, we encourage you to vote in advance by Internet, telephone or mail so that your vote will be counted even if you later decide not to attend the Annual Meeting.
What does it mean if I receive more than one Notice on or about the same time?
It generally means you hold shares registered in more than one account. To ensure that all your shares are voted, please sign and return each proxy card or, if you authorize a proxy by Internet or telephone, vote once for each Notice you receive.
May I change my vote or revoke my proxy?
Yes. Whether you have authorized a proxy by Internet, telephone or mail, if you are a stockholder of record, you may change your voting instructions or revoke your proxy by:

Sending a written statement to that effect to our Corporate Secretary, provided such statement is received no later than May 7, 2018;

Authorizing a proxy again by Internet or telephone at a later time before the closing of those voting facilities at 11:59 p.m. on May 7, 2018;

Submitting a properly signed proxy card with a later date that is received no later than May 7, 2018; or

Attending the Annual Meeting, revoking your proxy and voting in person.
3

If you hold shares in street name, you may submit new voting instructions by contacting your broker, bank or other nominee. You maysignificant corporate responsibility initiatives, while also change your vote or revoke your proxy in person at the Annual Meeting if you obtain a signed proxy from the record holder (broker, bank or other nominee) giving you the right to vote the shares.
Do I need a ticket or identification to be admitted to the Annual Meeting?
Yes, you will need your proof of identification along with either your Notice or proof of stock ownership to enter the Annual Meeting. If your shares are held beneficially in the name of a broker, bank or other nominee and you wish to be admitted to attend the Annual Meeting, you must present proof of your ownership of Brixmor Property Group Inc. stock, such as a bank or brokerage account statement.
No cameras, recording equipment, electronic devices, large bags, briefcases or packages will be permitted in the Annual Meeting.
Could other matters be decided at the Annual Meeting?
At the date this proxy statement went to press, we did not know of any matters that may be properly presented at the Annual Meeting other than those referred to in this proxy statement.
If other matters are properly presented at the Annual Meeting for consideration and you are a stockholder of record and have submitted a proxy card, the persons named in your proxy card will have the discretion to vote on those matters for you.
Who will pay for the cost of this proxy solicitation?
We will pay the cost of soliciting proxies. Proxies may be solicitedtheir feedback on our behalffinancial and operational performance and their views on industry trends and market conditions. We value the outlook and opinions offered by directors, officers or employees (for no additional compensation) in person orour investors and believe that ongoing dialogue is an important component of our governance practices. During 2019, we had approximately 500 equity and fixed income investor touchpoints and engaged with the majority of our actively managed investors, through a mix of in-person and telephonic meetings, industry and broker sponsored conferences, non-deal roadshows and property tours.

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

We have been recognized by telephone, electronic transmissionInstitutional Investor and facsimile transmission. Brokers, banksGreen Street Advisors for our outstanding corporate governance. We have also received the highest possible corporate governance score from ISS – a 1/10, which represents the highest level of governance quality and other nominees will be requested to solicit proxies or authorizations from beneficial owners and will be reimbursed for their reasonable expenses.

lowest level of governance risk.

Ranked #1 among
REITs for Corporate
Governance

Ranked #1 among
REITs for best
Corporate Governance

BRIXMOR PROPERTY GROUPï2020 PROXY STATEMENTïPAGE 11

4


PROPOSAL NO. 1—ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

>

PROPOSAL NO. 1 – ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

Upon the recommendation of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, eightnine nominees will be proposed for election as directors at the Annual Meeting to hold office until our next annual meeting of stockholders and until their successors are duly elected and qualify. Our nominees were selected by the Board, based on the recommendation of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee. All eightnine nominees currently serve on our boardBoard of directors.Directors. All of the nominees are willing to serve as

directors but, if any of them should decline or be unable to act as a director, the individuals designated in the proxy cards as proxies will exercise the discretionary authority provided to vote for the election of such substitute nominee selected by our boardBoard of directors,Directors, unless the Board alternatively acts to reduce the size of the Board or maintain a vacancy on the Board in accordance with our bylaws. The Board has no reason to believe that any such nominees will be unable or unwilling to serve.
Nominees for Election to the Board of Directors in 2018

CHARACTERISTICS OF BOARD OF DIRECTOR NOMINEES

89%

Independent
directors

1/3

Female
directors

58

Average
director age

5

Average years’
director tenure 

NOMINEES FOR ELECTION TO THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS IN 2020

The following information describes the offices held, other business directorships and the term of service of each director nominee. Beneficial ownership of equity securities of the director nominees is shown under “Ownership of Securities” below. The biographical description below for each nominee includes the specific experience, qualifications, attributes and skills that led to the conclusion by the Board that such person should serve as a director.

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS THAT STOCKHOLDERS VOTE
“FOR”THE ELECTION OF EACH OF THE DIRECTOR NOMINEES BELOW.

BRIXMOR PROPERTY GROUPï2020 PROXY STATEMENTïPAGE 12

>
[MISSING IMAGE: ph_jamesm-taylor.jpg]

DIRECTOR NOMINEES

James M. Taylor Jr.

Age 53

Director since 2016

Age 51Mr. Taylor has served as our Chief Executive Officer and President since May 2016 and as a director since June 2016. Mr. Taylor has more than 20 years of experience in the commercial real estate industry. From 2012 until joining Brixmor, he was Executive Vice President – Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer for Federal Realty Investment Trust, a real estate investment trust, and a member of Federal Realty’s executive and investment committees. At Federal Realty, he was also responsible for sourcing and evaluating business development opportunities for its east coast portfolio, as well as for operational oversight of its southeast portfolio. From 1998 to 2012, Mr. Taylor was a Senior Managing Director and the head of real estate investment banking at Eastdil Secured / Wells Fargo where he successfully completed over $100 billion of public debt and equity offerings, M&A transactions, asset and portfolio sales, private equity placements, mortgage financings and bank loans for his real estate clients. Prior to joining Eastdil Secured, Mr. Taylor practiced corporate and securities law at the law firm Hunton & Williams, with a focus on equity REITs, and also worked as a senior accountant for the accounting firm Price Waterhouse in Washington, D.C. Mr. Taylor is a member of the International Council of Shopping Centers Board of Trustees and its Executive Board, as well as the National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts (“NAREIT”) Advisory Board of Governors. He is also a member of the Urban Land Institute (ULI). He received a B.S. and J.D. from the University of Virginia. In determining that he should serve as a director, our Board considered Mr. Taylor’s extensive experience over more than 20 years in the commercial real estate industry and his knowledge of our business and portfolio as our Chief Executive Officer.
Mr. Taylor has served as our Chief Executive Officer and President since May 2016 and as a director since June 2016. Mr. Taylor has more than 20 years of experience in the commercial real estate industry. From 2012 until joining Brixmor, he was Executive Vice President—Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer for Federal Realty Investment Trust, a real estate investment trust, and a member of Federal Realty’s executive and investment committees. At Federal Realty, he was also responsible for sourcing and evaluating business development opportunities for its east coast portfolio, as well as for operational oversight of its southeast portfolio. From 1998 to 2012, Mr. Taylor was a Senior Managing Director and the head of real estate investment banking at Eastdil Secured/Wells Fargo where he successfully completed over $100 billion of public debt and equity offerings, M&A transactions, asset and portfolio sales, private equity placements, mortgage financings and bank loans for his real estate clients. Prior to joining Eastdil Secured, Mr. Taylor practiced corporate and securities law at the law firm Hunton & Williams, with a focus on equity REITs, and also worked as a senior accountant for the accounting firm Price Waterhouse in Washington, D.C. He is a member of the Urban Land Institute (ULI). He received a B.S. and J.D. from the University of Virginia. In determining that he should serve as a director, our Board considered Mr. Taylor’s extensive experience over more than 20 years in the commercial real estate industry and his knowledge of our business and portfolio as our chief executive officer.
5

[MISSING IMAGE: ph_john-schreiber.jpg]

 

John G. Schreiber

Age 73

Director and Chairman since 2013

Committee membership:

·Compensation

·Nominating & Corporate Governance

Age 72Mr. Schreiber has served as a Director since October 2013. Mr. Schreiber is the President of Centaur Capital Partners, Inc. In December 2015, he retired as a Partner and Co-Founder of Blackstone Real Estate Advisors (“BREA”). As Co-Chairman of the BREA Investment Committee, Mr. Schreiber oversaw all Blackstone real estate investments since its founding in 1992. Prior thereto, Mr. Schreiber served as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of JMB Urban Development Co. and Executive Vice President of JMB Realty Corp. Mr. Schreiber currently serves on the Board of JMB Realty Corp. and Hilton Worldwide Inc., where he serves on the Compensation Committee. Mr. Schreiber is a Director/Trustee of a number of mutual funds managed by T. Rowe Price Associates and a Trustee of Loyola University. He is a past Board member of Invitation Homes, GGP Inc., Hudson Pacific Properties, Inc., Urban Shopping Centers, Inc., Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc., The Rouse Company, AMLI Residential Properties Trust, Inc. and Blackstone Mortgage Trust, Inc. Mr. Schreiber graduated from Loyola University of Chicago and received an M.B.A. from Harvard Business School. In determining that he should serve as a director, our Board considered Mr. Schreiber’s extensive experience with, and strong record of success in investing in, real estate-related assets, as well as his significant experience in serving as a director of various other companies, including real estate companies.

BRIXMOR PROPERTY GROUPï2020 PROXY STATEMENTïPAGE 13

Mr. Schreiber has served as a Director since 2013. Mr. Schreiber is the President of Centaur Capital Partners, Inc. In December 2015, he retired as a Partner and Co-Founder of Blackstone Real Estate Advisors (“BREA”). As Co-Chairman of the BREA Investment Committee, Mr. Schreiber oversaw all Blackstone real estate investments since its founding in 1992. Prior thereto, Mr. Schreiber served as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of JMB Urban Development Co. and Executive Vice President of JMB Realty Corp. Mr. Schreiber currently serves on the board of JMB Realty Corp. and Hilton Worldwide Inc., where he serves as the Chairman of the Compensation Committee. Mr. Schreiber is a Director/Trustee of a number of mutual funds managed by T. Rowe Price Associates and a Trustee of Loyola University. He is a past board member of Invitation Homes, General Growth Properties, Urban Shopping Centers, Inc., Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc., The Rouse Company, AMLI Residential Properties Trust, Inc. and Blackstone Mortgage Trust, Inc. Mr. Schreiber graduated from Loyola University of Chicago and received an M.B.A. from Harvard Business School. In determining that he should serve as a director, our Board considered Mr. Schreiber’s extensive experience with, and strong record of success in investing in, real estate-related assets, as well as his significant experience in serving as a director of various other companies, including real estate companies.

[MISSING IMAGE: ph_michael-berman.jpg]

Michael Berman

Age 62

Director since 2013

Committee membership:

·Audit (Chair)

Age 60Mr. Berman has served as a Director since October 2013. From January 2018 until March 2018, Mr. Berman served as Executive Vice President, Finance of GGP, Inc. (“GGP”) and oversaw its finance function. Prior thereto, Mr. Berman previously served as Chief Financial Officer of GGP and oversaw its finance, accounting, capital markets, treasury, investor relations and corporate communications functions. He joined GGP in December 2011 and has over 25 years of combined experience in the real estate and financial industries. From September 2003 until he joined GGP, Mr. Berman served as Chief Financial Officer of Equity LifeStyle Properties, Inc. During 2003, Mr. Berman was an associate professor at the New York University Real Estate Institute. From 1997 to 2002, he was a managing director in the investment banking department at Merrill Lynch & Co. Mr. Berman currently serves on the Board of Skyline Champion Corp., where he serves on the Governance and Nominating Committee and as the Chairman of the Audit Committee. Mr. Berman holds an M.B.A. from Columbia University Graduate School of Business, a J.D. from Boston University School of Law and a bachelor’s degree from Binghamton University in New York. In determining that he should serve as a director, our Board considered Mr. Berman’s extensive experience in the real estate and finance industries, including in the retail property sector in particular, and his familiarity with financial reporting and accounting matters.
Mr. Berman has served as a Director since 2013. From January 2018 until March 2018, Mr. Berman served as Executive Vice President, Finance of GGP Inc. (“GGP”) and oversaw its finance function. Prior thereto, Mr. Berman previously served as Chief Financial Officer of GGP and oversaw its finance, accounting, capital markets, treasury, investor relations and corporate communications functions. He joined GGP in December 2011 and has over 25 years of combined experience in the real estate and financial industries. From September 2003 until he joined GGP, Mr. Berman served as Chief Financial Officer of Equity LifeStyle Properties, Inc. During 2003, Mr. Berman was an associate professor at the New York University Real Estate Institute. From 1997 to 2002, he was a managing director in the investment banking department at Merrill Lynch & Co. Mr. Berman holds an M.B.A. from Columbia University Graduate School of Business, a J.D. from Boston University School of Law and a bachelor’s degree from Binghamton University in New York. Mr. Berman is a member of the Columbia Business School Real Estate Advisory Board and is a member of the Urban Land Institute. In determining that he should serve as a director, our Board considered Mr. Berman’s extensive experience in the real estate and finance industries, including in the retail property sector in particular, and his familiarity with financial reporting and accounting matters.
6

Julie Bowerman

Age 51

Director since 2019

Committee membership:

·Nominating & Corporate Governance

[MISSING IMAGE: ph_sheryl-crosland.jpg]
Ms. Bowerman has served as a Director since February 2019. Ms. Bowerman is currently the Chief Global Digital, Consumer and Customer Experience Officer of Kellogg Company, a food manufacturing company. Prior to joining Kellogg in 2019, Ms. Bowerman served as the Senior Vice President, Digital Engagement and eCommerce at The Hain Celestial Group, Inc., a leading organic and natural products company with operations in North America, Europe, Asia and the Middle East. Prior to joining The Hain Celestial Group, Inc. in 2017, she spent over 20 years at The Coca-Cola Company, serving in various roles, including, most recently as Global Vice President, eCommerce, Shopper Marketing and Digital from 2015 to 2017, and as the Vice President and General Manager, eCommerce, North America from 2013-2015. Ms. Bowerman attained a BA, Communications from the University of Dayton and a Masters in Advertising from Michigan State University. In determining that she should serve as a director, our Board considered Ms. Bowerman’s extensive experience in physical and digital commerce, marketing, omni channel sales and consumer products businesses.

BRIXMOR PROPERTY GROUPï2020 PROXY STATEMENTïPAGE 14

  

Sheryl M. Crosland

Age 67

Director since 2016

Committee membership:

·Audit

Age 65Ms. Crosland has served as a Director since December 2016. Ms. Crosland most recently served as Managing Director and Retail Sector Head at JP Morgan Investment Management’s Global Real Assets Group from 1998 until 2014. She spent over 30 years with JP Morgan in various positions in real estate investment management and served on the Board of Directors of Donahue Schriber Realty Group and Edens Investment Trust. Ms. Crosland attained a B.S. from Furman University and a Master of Science in Industrial Management from Georgia Institute of Technology and is a certified public accountant. In determining that she should serve as a director, our Board considered Ms. Crosland’s extensive experience in the real estate industry, in particular her familiarity with real estate investment, ownership and operational experience.
Ms. Crosland has served as a Director since December 2016. Ms. Crosland most recently served as Managing Director and Retail Sector Head at JP Morgan Investment Management’s Global Real Assets Group from 1998 until 2014. She spent over 30 years with JP Morgan in various positions in real estate investment management and served on the Board of Directors of Donahue Schriber Realty Group and Edens Investment Trust. Ms. Crosland attained a B.S. from Furman University and a Master of Science in Industrial Management from Georgia Institute of Technology and is a certified public accountant. In determining that she should serve as a director, our Board considered Ms. Crosland’s extensive experience in the real estate industry, in particular her familiarity with real estate investment, ownership and operational experience.

[MISSING IMAGE: ph_thomas-dickson.jpg]

Thomas W. Dickson

Age 64

Director since 2015

Committee membership:

·Compensation

Age 62Mr. Dickson has served as a Director since April 2015. Mr. Dickson most recently served as Chief Executive Officer of Harris Teeter, a leading regional supermarket chain of more than 200 supermarkets, primarily in the Southeastern and Mid-Atlantic United States, from February 1997 until Harris Teeter’s sale to The Kroger Co. in January 2014, and also served as Chairman of the Board of Harris Teeter from March 2006 until January 2014. Prior to becoming Chief Executive Officer, Mr. Dickson served as President of Harris Teeter from February 1997 through March 2012 and as Executive Vice President of Harris Teeter from February 1996 to February 1997. From February 1994 to February 1996, Mr. Dickson served as President of American & Efird, Inc., Harris Teeter’s former A&E subsidiary, and from February 1991 to February 1994 he served as Executive Vice President of American & Efird, Inc. He served as Chairman of the Board of The Pantry, Inc. from April 2014 until its sale in March 2015. Mr. Dickson currently serves on the Board of Directors of Dollar Tree, Inc., where he serves on the Compensation Committee. He previously served on the Board of Directors of Conagra Brands, Inc. Mr. Dickson attained a B.A. and M.B.A. from the University of Virginia. In determining that he should serve as a director, our Board considered Mr. Dickson’s extensive operational experience and expertise in the supermarket grocery business, his broad real estate knowledge and his substantial public company Board experience.

BRIXMOR PROPERTY GROUPï2020 PROXY STATEMENTïPAGE 15

Mr. Dickson has served as a Director since 2015. Mr. Dickson most recently served as Chief Executive Officer of Harris Teeter, a leading regional supermarket chain of more than 200 supermarkets, primarily in the Southeastern and Mid-Atlantic United States, from February 1997 until Harris Teeter’s sale to The Kroger Co. in January 2014, and also served as Chairman of the Board of Harris Teeter from March 2006 until January 2014. Prior to becoming Chief Executive Officer, Mr. Dickson served as President of Harris Teeter from February 1997 through March 2012 and as Executive Vice President of Harris Teeter from February 1996 to February 1997. From February 1994 to February 1996, Mr. Dickson served as President of American & Efird, Inc., Harris Teeter’s former A&E subsidiary, and from February 1991 to February 1994 he served as Executive Vice President of American & Efird, Inc. He served as Chairman of the Board of The Pantry, Inc. from April 2014 until its sale in March 2015. Mr. Dickson currently serves on the Board of Directors of Conagra Brands, Inc., where he is also a member of the Nominating, Governance and Public Affairs Committee. Mr. Dickson attained a B.A. and M.B.A. from the University of Virginia. In determining that he should serve as a director, our Board considered Mr. Dickson’s extensive operational experience and expertise in the supermarket grocery business, his broad real estate knowledge and his substantial public company board experience.

7

[MISSING IMAGE: ph_daniel-hurwitz.jpg]

Daniel B. Hurwitz

Age 56

Director since 2016

Committee membership:

·Compensation

Age 54Mr. Hurwitz has served as a Director since May 2016. Mr. Hurwitz is the Founder and Chief Executive Officer of Raider Hill Advisors, LLC, a private real estate investment and retail advisory firm located in New York City. From February 2016 through May 2016, he served as the Interim Chief Executive Officer and President of Brixmor Property Group. Prior to founding Raider Hill Advisors, LLC, Mr. Hurwitz served as Chief Executive Officer of DDR Corp. (“DDR”), a NYSE listed real estate investment trust, from January 2010 until December 2014, and prior thereto since 1999 held numerous executive positions at DDR. Mr. Hurwitz currently serves as Chairman of the Board of Trustees Executive Committee of the International Council of Shopping Centers. He previously served as a member of the NAREIT Executive Board of Governors and Governance Committee and was on the Board of Directors of GGP Inc., DDR Corp., CubeSmart, Sonae Sierra Brasil, SA and Boscov's Department Store, Inc. Mr. Hurwitz is a graduate of Colgate University and currently serves as Chairman of the Colgate University Board of Trustees. In determining that he should serve as a director, our Board considered Mr. Hurwitz’s extensive management experience as chief executive officer of another publicly-traded real estate investment trust and interim Chief Executive Officer of the Company, his extensive experience with shopping centers and his extensive experience as a director of other public real estate companies.
Mr. Hurwitz has served as a Director since February 2016 and previously served as our interim President and Chief Executive Officer from February 2016 until May 2016. Mr. Hurwitz is the founder and chief executive officer of Raider Hill Advisors, LLC, a private real estate investment and retail advisory firm located in New York City. Prior to founding Raider Hill in 2015, Mr. Hurwitz served in numerous executive capacities for DDR Corp. from 1999 to 2015, culminating in the role of chief executive officer from January 2010 to December 2014. DDR Corp. is a NYSE-listed real estate investment trust that owns and manages shopping centers. Mr. Hurwitz currently serves on the board of directors of International Council of Shopping Centers (ICSC) and General Growth Properties, Inc., where he is lead director and serves on both the audit and compensation committees. Mr. Hurwitz has previously served as a member of the ICSC Board of Trustees Executive Committee. He also previously served as a member of the NAREIT Executive Board of Governors and Governance Committee in addition to the Board of Directors of DDR Corp, CubeSmart, Sonae Sierra Brasil, SA and Boscovs Department Store, Inc. Mr. Hurwitz is a graduate of Colgate University and currently serves as Chairman of the Colgate University Board of Trustees. In determining that he should serve as a director, our Board considered Mr. Hurwitz’s extensive management experience as chief executive officer of another publicly-traded real estate investment trust and interim chief executive officer of the Company, his extensive experience with shopping centers and his extensive experience as a director of other public real estate companies.

[MISSING IMAGE: ph_william-rahm.jpg]

William D. Rahm

Age 41

Director since 2013

Committee membership:

·Compensation (Chair)

·Nominating & Corporate Governance

Age 39Mr. Rahm has served as a Director since October 2013. Mr. Rahm is a Senior Managing Director of Centerbridge Partners, L.P., which he joined at its inception in 2006. He currently leads the firm’s real estate investment activities. Prior to joining Centerbridge, Mr. Rahm was a member of Blackstone’s real estate private equity group, where he completed investments in lodging businesses and real estate assets. Mr. Rahm graduated cum laude from Yale College. He received his J.D. cum laude from Harvard Law School and his M.B.A. with distinction from Harvard Business School. Mr. Rahm currently serves on the Boards of Directors of Merit Hill Holdings REIT LLC, Great Wolf Resorts, Inc. and Digital Landscape Group, Inc. Mr. Rahm previously served on the Board of Directors of Extended Stay America, Inc. and Carefree Communities, Inc. In determining that he should serve as a director, our Board considered Mr. Rahm’s extensive experience in real estate and investments and his significant understanding of issues and risks that affect the Company.

BRIXMOR PROPERTY GROUPï2020 PROXY STATEMENTïPAGE 16

Mr. Rahm has served as a Director since 2013. Mr. Rahm is a Senior Managing Director of Centerbridge Partners, L.P., which he joined at its inception in 2006. He currently leads the firm’s real estate investment activities. Prior to joining Centerbridge, Mr. Rahm was a member of Blackstone’s real estate private equity group, where he completed investments in lodging businesses and real estate assets. Mr. Rahm graduated cum laude from Yale College. He received his J.D. cum laude from Harvard Law School and his M.B.A. with distinction from Harvard Business School. Mr. Rahm currently serves on the Board of Directors of Merit Hill Holdings REIT LLC and as Chairman of the Board of Great Wolf Resorts, Inc. Mr. Rahm previously served on the Board of Directors of Extended Stay America, Inc. In determining that he should serve as a director, our Board considered Mr. Rahm’s extensive experience in real estate and investments and his significant understanding of issues and risks that affect the Company.

8

[MISSING IMAGE: ph_gabrielle-sulzberger.jpg]

Gabrielle Sulzberger

Age 59

Director since 2015

Committee membership:

·Audit

·Nominating & Corporate Governance (Chair)

Age 57Ms. Sulzberger has served as a Director since June 2015. Ms. Sulzberger is a General Partner of Rustic Canyon/Fontis Partners, L.P. (“RC/Fontis”), a private equity fund, which she co-founded in 2005. During her tenure at RC/Fontis, from October 2011 to February 2013, she served as interim CEO of Johnson Products Company, a portfolio company of RC/Fontis that manufactures hair care products. Previously, from 2002 through 2005, Ms. Sulzberger was Chief Financial Officer of the Villanueva Companies, a private holding company with diverse investment interests. She currently serves on the Board of Directors of Mastercard Incorporated, where she serves as member of the Nominating and Governance Committee. She has previously served on the Board of Directors of Whole Foods Market, Inc., Stage Stores, Inc., Bright Horizons Family Solutions, and Teva Pharmaceutical Industries. Ms. Sulzberger received a J.D. from Harvard Law School, an M.B.A. from Harvard Business School and a B.A. from Princeton University. In determining that she should serve as a director, our Board considered Ms. Sulzberger’s experience as a general partner and manager of a diversified private equity fund, executive positions of several consumer product companies and her audit committee chairman experience at a large public company in the retail sector.

BRIXMOR PROPERTY GROUPï2020 PROXY STATEMENTïPAGE 17

Ms. Sulzberger has served as a Director since 2015. Ms. Sulzberger is a General Partner of Rustic Canyon/Fontis Partners, L.P. (“RC/Fontis”), a private equity fund, which she co-founded in 2005. During her tenure at RC/Fontis, from October 2011 to February 2013, she served as interim CEO of Johnson Products Company, a portfolio company of RC/Fontis that manufactures hair care products. Previously, from 2002 through 2005, Ms. Sulzberger was Chief Financial Officer of the Villanueva Companies, a private holding company with diverse investment interests. She currently serves on the Board of Directors of Teva Pharmaceutical Industries, where she also serves on the compensation and corporate responsibility committees. She has previously served on the Board of Directors of Whole Foods Market, Inc., Stage Stores, Inc. and Bright Horizons Family Solutions. Ms. Sulzberger received a J.D. from Harvard Law School, an M.B.A. from Harvard Business School and a B.A. from Princeton University. In determining that she should serve as a director, our Board considered Ms. Sulzberger’s experience as a general partner and manager of a diversified private equity fund, executive positions of several consumer product companies and her audit committee chairman experience at a large public company in the retail sector.

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS THAT STOCKHOLDERS VOTE “FOR” THE ELECTION OF EACH OF THE DIRECTOR NOMINEES NAMED ABOVE.

9

The Board of Directors and Certain Governance Matters
AND CERTAIN GOVERNANCE MATTERS

The business and affairs of the Company are managed under the direction of our Board, as provided by Maryland law, and the Company conducts its business through meetings of the Board and its three standing committees: the Audit Committee, the Compensation Committee and the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee.

We have structured our corporate governance in a manner we believe closely aligns our interests with those of our stockholders. Notable features of our corporate governance include:

·Our Board is not classified and each of our directors is subject to re-election annually, and we will not classify our Board in the future without the approval of our stockholders;

·Our directors may be removed by the vote of a majority of the votes entitled to be cast and our Board may not increase the vote required to remove a director without stockholder approval;

·We have fully independent Audit, Compensation and Nominating and Corporate Governance Committees, and our independent directors meet regularly in executive sessions without the presence of our corporate officers or non-independent directors;

·Our Board has an independent Chairman and a Presiding Independent Director;

·All members of our Audit Committee are “financial experts” as defined by applicable SEC regulations;

·Each senior officer (our Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and each Executive Vice President) is expected to own common stock or common stock equivalents equal in market value to at least three to six times his or her annual base salary, depending on his or her position;

·Our employees (including our executive officers) and members of our Board are prohibited from engaging in any hedging transactions with respect to equity securities of the Company held by them, which includes buying or selling puts, calls, options or similar Company-based derivative securities, including for hedging purposes;

·Our directors are elected by a vote of a majority of votes cast in uncontested elections, and in the event that an incumbent director fails to receive a majority of votes cast in an uncontested election, such incumbent director is required to submit his or her resignation to the Board, which will decide what action to take on the resignation, and the decision will be publicly disclosed;

·We have opted out of the Maryland unsolicited takeover, business combination and control share acquisition statutes, and in the future will not opt in without stockholder approval;

·We do not have a stockholder rights plan, and we will not adopt a stockholder rights plan in the future without stockholder approval;

·As part of our Board tenure and refreshment strategy, we have a mandatory retirement age of 75;

·Stockholders holding a majority of outstanding shares have the right to amend, alter or repeal our bylaws, or adopt new bylaws, at a duly called meeting of stockholders; and

·Our Board views its diversity as an important strength, with women currently constituting one-third of its members.

BRIXMOR PROPERTY GROUPï2020 PROXY STATEMENTïPAGE 18


our Board is not classified and each of our directors is subject to re-election annually, and we will not classify our Board in the future without the approval of our stockholders;

our directors may be removed by the vote of a majority of the votes entitled to be cast and our Board may not increase the vote required to remove a director without stockholder approval;

we have fully independent audit, compensation and nominating and corporate governance committees, and our independent directors meet regularly in executive sessions without the presence of our corporate officers or non-independent directors;

our Board has an independent Chairman and a Lead Independent Director;

all members of our audit committee are “financial experts” as defined by applicable SEC regulations;

each senior officer (our chief executive officer, chief financial officer and each executive vice president) is expected to own common stock or common stock equivalents
equal in market value to at least three to six times his or her annual base salary, depending on his or her position;

our executive officers and members of our board are prohibited from engaging in any hedging transactions with respect to equity securities of the Company held by them, which includes the purchase of any financial instrument designed to hedge or offset any decrease in the market value of such equity securities;

our directors are elected by a vote of a majority of votes cast in uncontested elections, and in the event that an incumbent director fails to receive a majority of votes cast in an uncontested election, such incumbent director is required to submit his or her resignation to the Board, which will decide what action to take on the resignation, and the decision will be publicly disclosed;

we have opted out of the Maryland business combination and control share acquisition statutes, and in the future will not opt in without stockholder approval;

we do not have a stockholder rights plan, and we will not adopt a stockholder rights plan in the future without stockholder approval;

as part of our Board tenure and refreshment strategy, we have a mandatory retirement age of 75;

stockholders holding a majority of outstanding shares have the right to amend, alter or repeal our bylaws, or adopt new bylaws, at a duly called meeting of stockholders; and

our Board views its diversity as an important strength, with women currently constituting 25% of its members.
Director Independence and Independence Determinations

DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE AND INDEPENDENCE DETERMINATIONS

Under our Corporate Governance Guidelines and NYSE rules, a director is not independent unless the Board affirmatively determines that he or she does not have a direct or indirect material relationship with the Company or any of its subsidiaries.

Our Corporate Governance Guidelines define independence in accordance with the independence

definition in the current NYSE corporate governance rules for listed companies. Our Corporate Governance Guidelines require the Board to review the independence of all directors at least annually.

In the event a director has a relationship with the Company that is relevant to his or her independence and is not addressed by the objective tests set forth in

10

the NYSE independence definition, the Board will determine, considering all relevant facts and circumstances, whether such relationship is material.

The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee undertook its annual review of director independence and made a recommendation to our Board regarding director independence. As a result of this review, our Board affirmatively determined that each of Messrs. Berman, Dickson, Hurwitz, Rahm and Schreiber and Mses. Bowerman, Crosland and Sulzberger is independent for purposes of all applicable New York Stock ExchangeNYSE standards, including with respect to committee service. Our Board has also determined that each of Mr. Berman and Mses. Crosland and

Sulzberger is “independent” for purposes of Section 10A(m)(3) and each of Messrs. Dickson, Hurwitz, Rahm and Schreiber is “independent” for purposes of Section 10C(b) of the Exchange Act. In addition, the Board affirmatively determined that Anthony Deering, who served on the Board for part of 2017, was independent for purposes of all applicable New York Stock Exchange standards, including with respect to committee service.

In making its independence determinations, the Board considered and reviewed all information known to it (including information identified through annual directors’ questionnaires).

Board Structure

BOARD STRUCTURE

Our Board is led by the Chairman. The Chief Executive Officer position is separate from the Chairman position. We believe that the separation of the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer positions is appropriate corporate governance for us at this time. Accordingly, Mr. Schreiber serves as Chairman, while Mr. Taylor serves as our Chief Executive Officer and President. Our Board believes that this structure best

encourages the free and open dialogue of competing views and provides for strong checks and balances. Additionally, Mr. Schreiber’s attention to Board and committee matters allows the Chief Executive Officer to focus more specifically on overseeing the Company’s day to day operations as well asand long-term strategic opportunities and planning.
Board Committees and Meetings
The following table summarizes the current membership of each of the Board’s Committees.
Audit
Committee
Compensation
Committee
Nominating
and Corporate
Governance
Committee
James M. Taylor Jr.
John G. SchreiberXX
Michael BermanX, Chair
Sheryl M. CroslandX
Thomas W. DicksonX
Daniel B. HurwitzX
William D. RahmX, ChairX
Gabrielle SulzbergerXX, Chair

All directors are expected to make every effort to attend all meetings of the Board, meetings of the committees of which they are members and the annual meeting of stockholders. During the year ended December 31, 2017,2019, the Board held 8 meetings, the Audit Committee held 8 meetings, the Compensation Committee held 4 meetings and the

Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee held 3eight meetings. All of our directors attended at least 75% of the aggregate of the meetings of the Board and relevant committee meetings in 2017.the Committees on which they serve. All nine of our directors then serving on the Board attended the 2017 annual meeting2019 Annual Meeting of stockholders.
Stockholders.

BRIXMOR PROPERTY GROUPï2020 PROXY STATEMENTïPAGE 19

BOARD COMMITTEES

AUDIT COMMITTEE

Members:

Michael Berman (Chair) 

Sheryl M. Crosland

Gabrielle Sulzberger

2019 meetings: 8

The duties and responsibilities of the Audit Committee are set forth in its charter, which may be found on our website under Investors: Governance: Audit Committee Charter

Requirements:

·All members are “independent,” in accordance with the Committee’s charter and the applicable NYSE listing standards related to Boards of Directors in general and audit committees in particular

·Each of the members of the Audit Committee is “financially literate” within the meaning of the NYSE listing standards

·In addition, our Board has determined that each of the members of the Audit Committee qualifies as an audit committee financial expert as defined by applicable SEC regulations

·Mr. Berman’s qualification is based on, among other things, his 15 years of experience as a Chief Financial Officer of two public real estate companies

·Ms. Crosland’s qualification is based on, among other things, her education as a certified public accountant, her more than 30 years of experience in real estate investment management and her service on the audit committees of several private real estate companies

·Ms. Sulzberger’s qualification is based on, among other things, her more than ten years of experience in private equity, her more than five years of experience as a Chief Financial Officer and her service as audit committee chairman of a public company

Duties and responsibilities:

·Oversees the Company’s risk management policies and procedures (see “Oversight of Risk Management” below) and reviews and discusses with management and the independent registered public accounting firm our guidelines and policies with respect to risk assessment and risk management

·Carries out the responsibilities and duties delegated to it by the Board, including oversight of our financial reporting policies, our internal controls and our compliance with legal and regulatory requirements applicable to financial statements and accounting and financial reporting processes

·Selects our independent registered public accounting firm and reviews and evaluates its qualifications, performance and independence

·Reviews and pre-approves the audit and non-audit services and the payment of compensation to the independent registered public accounting firm

·Reviews reports and material written communications between management and the independent registered public accounting firm, including with respect to major issues as to the adequacy of the Company’s internal controls

·Reviews the work of our internal audit function

·Reviews and discusses with management and the independent registered public accounting firm our annual audited financial statements and quarterly financial statements prior to inclusion in our Annual Report on Form 10-K or other public dissemination in accordance with applicable rules and regulations of the SEC

BRIXMOR PROPERTY GROUPï2020 PROXY STATEMENTïPAGE 20

11


Committee Membership
Audit Committee

COMPENSATION COMMITTEE

Members:

William D. Rahm (Chair)

Thomas W. Dickson

Daniel B. Hurwitz

John G. Schreiber

2019 meetings: 2

The duties and responsibilities of the Compensation Committee are set forth in its charter, which may be found on our website under Investors: Governance: Compensation Committee Charter

Requirements:

·All members are “independent,” in accordance with the Committee’s charter and the applicable NYSE listing standards related to Boards of Directors in general and compensation committees in particular

Duties and responsibilities:

·Establishes and reviews the overall compensation philosophy of the Company

·Reviews and approves corporate goals and objectives relevant to the Chief Executive Officer and other executive officers’ compensation, including annual performance objectives, if any

·Evaluates the performance of the Chief Executive Officer in light of these corporate goals and objectives and, either as a committee or together with the other independent Directors (as directed by the Board), determines and approves the annual salary, bonus, equity-based incentives and other benefits, direct and indirect, of the Chief Executive Officer

·Reviews and approves, or makes recommendations to the Board, on the annual salary, bonus, equity and equity-based incentives and other benefits, direct and indirect, of the other executive officers

·Reviews and approves, or makes recommendations to the Board with respect to, incentive-compensation plans and equity-based plans that are subject to the approval of the Board, and oversees the activities of the individuals responsible for administering those plans

·Reviews and approves equity compensation plans of the Company that are not otherwise subject to the approval of the Company’s stockholders

·Reviews and approves, or makes recommendations to the Board with respect to, all equity-based awards, including pursuant to the Company’s equity-based plans

·Monitors compliance by executives with the rules and guidelines of the Company’s equity-based plans

·Reviews and monitors all employee retirement, profit sharing and benefit plans of the Company

·Oversees the preparation of the Compensation Discussion and Analysis and determining whether or not to recommend to the Board that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in our annual proxy statement or Annual Report on Form 10-K in accordance with applicable rules and regulations of the SEC

Additional items of the Audit Committee are “independent,” in accordance with our Audit Committee charter and the applicable NYSE listing standards applicable to boards of directors in general and audit committees in particular. Our Board has determined that each of the members of the Audit Committee is “financially literate” within the meaning of the listing standards of the New York Stock Exchange. In addition, our Board has determined that each of the members of the Audit Committee qualifies as an audit committee financial expert as defined by applicable SEC regulations. The Board reached its conclusion as to Mr. Berman’s qualification based on, among other things, his more than 10 years of experience as the Chief Financial Officer of two public real estate investment trusts. The Board reached its conclusion as to Ms. Crosland based on her education as a certified public accountant, her 30 years of experience in real estate investment management and her service on the audit committee of several private real estate companies. The Board reached its conclusions as to Ms. Sulzberger based on, among other things, her 10 years of experience as a partner at a private equity fund, four years of experience as a chief financial officer and her experience as audit committee chairman of a public company.

The duties and responsibilities of the Audit Committee are set forth in its charter, which may be found at www.brixmor.com under Investors: Governance: Audit Committee Charter, and include among others the following:

carrying out the responsibilities and duties delegated to it by the Board, including its oversight of our financial reporting policies, our internal controls and our compliance with legal and regulatory requirements applicable to financial statements and accounting and financial reporting processes;

selecting our independent registered public accounting firm and reviewing and evaluating its qualifications, performance and independence;

reviewing and pre-approving the audit and non-audit services and the payment of compensation to the independent registered public accounting firm;

reviewing reports and material written communications between management and the independent registered public accounting firm, including with respect to major issues as to the adequacy of the Company’s internal controls;

reviewing the work of our internal audit function; and

reviewing and discussing with management and the independent registered public accounting firm our guidelines and policies with respect to risk assessment and risk management.
With respect to our reporting and disclosure matters, the responsibilities and duties of the Audit Committee include reviewing and discussing with management and the independent registered public accounting firm our annual audited financial statements and quarterly financial statements prior to inclusion in our Annual Report on Form 10-K or other public dissemination in accordance with applicable rules and regulations of the SEC.
On behalf of the Board, the Audit Committee plays a key role in the oversight of the Company’s risk management policies and procedures. See “Oversight of Risk Management” below.
Compensation Committee
All members of the Compensation Committee are “independent,” in accordance with our Compensation Committee charter and the applicable NYSE listing standards applicable to boards of directors in general and compensation committees in particular.
The duties and responsibilities of the Compensation Committee are set forth in its charter, which may be found at www.brixmor.com under Investors: Governance: Compensation Committee Charter, and include among others the following:

establishing and reviewing the overall compensation philosophy of the Company;

reviewing and approving corporate goals and objectives relevant to the Chief Executive Officer and other executive officers’ compensation, including annual performance objectives, if any;
12


evaluating the performance of the Chief Executive Officer in light of these corporate goals and objectives and, either as a committee or together with the other independent directors (as directed by the Board), determining and approving the annual salary, bonus, equity-based incentives and other benefits, direct and indirect, of the Chief Executive Officer;

reviewing and approving, or making recommendations to the Board, on the annual salary, bonus, equity and equity-based incentives and other benefits, direct and indirect, of the other executive officers;

considering policies and procedures pertaining to expense accounts of senior executives;

reviewing and approving, or making recommendations to the Board with respect to, incentive-compensation plans and equity-based plans that are subject to the approval of the Board, and overseeing the activities of the individuals responsible for administering those plans;

reviewing and approving equity compensation plans of the Company that are not otherwise subject to the approval of the Company’s stockholders;

reviewing and making recommendations to the Board, or approving, all equity-based awards, including pursuant to the Company’s equity-based plans;

monitoring compliance by executives with the rules and guidelines of the Company’s equity-based plans; and

reviewing and monitoring all employee retirement, profit sharing and benefit plans of the Company.
With respect to our reporting and disclosure matters, the responsibilities and duties of the Compensation Committee include, among others, overseeing the preparation of the Compensation Discussion and Analysis and determining whether or not to recommend to the Board that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in our annual proxy statement or Annual Report on Form 10-K in accordance with applicable rules and regulations of the SEC. note:

The charter of the Compensation Committee permits the committee to delegate any or all of its authority to one or more subcommittees and to delegate to one or more officers of the Company the authority to make awards to any non-Section 16 officer of the Company under the Company’s

incentive-compensation or other equity-based plan, subject to compliance with the plan and the laws of the state of the Company’s jurisdiction.

The Compensation Committee has the authority under its charter to retain outside consultants or advisors, as it deems necessary or advisable.

BRIXMOR PROPERTY GROUPï2020 PROXY STATEMENTïPAGE 21

In 2017,2019, James M. Taylor Jr., our President and Chief Executive Officer, generally participated in discussions and deliberations with the Compensation Committee regarding determinations of annual cash and equity incentive awards for our executive officers. Specifically, he made recommendations to the Compensation Committee regarding executive salaries, equity awards, the performance targets used under our annual bonus plan and the amounts of annual cash incentive awards. Mr. Taylor did not participate in deliberations regarding his own compensation.

NOMINATING AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE COMMITTEE

Members:

Gabrielle Sulzberger (Chair)

Julie Bowerman 

William D. Rahm

John G. Schreiber

2019 meetings: 2

The duties and responsibilities of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee are set forth in its charter, which may be found on our website under Investors: Governance: Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee Charter

Requirements:

·All members are “independent,” in accordance with the Committee’s charter and applicable NYSE listing standards

Duties and responsibilities:

·Establishes the criteria for the selection of new directors

·Identifies and recommends to the Board individuals to be nominated as directors

·Evaluates candidates for nomination to the Board, including those recommended by stockholders

·Conducts all necessary and appropriate inquiries into the backgrounds and qualifications of possible candidates

·Considers questions of independence and possible conflicts of interest of members of the Board and executive officers

·Reviews and recommends the composition and size of the Board

·Oversees the evaluation of the Board, its committees, as applicable, and management

·Recommends members of the Board to serve on the committees of the Board and, where appropriate, recommends the removal of any member of any committee

BRIXMOR PROPERTY GROUPï2020 PROXY STATEMENTïPAGE 22

For 2017, the Compensation Committee engaged the services of FPL Associates L.P. (“FPL”) as its independent outside compensation consultant. All executive compensation services provided by FPL were conducted under the direction or authority of the Compensation Committee, and all work performed by FPL was pre-approved by the Compensation Committee. Neither FPL nor any of its affiliates maintains any other direct or indirect business relationships with the Company. As requested by the Compensation Committee, in 2017, FPL’s services to the Compensation Committee consisted of compensation consulting services which included general involvement and support in compensation related matters, including assessment of the Company’s long-term incentive compensation program, as well as reports and market trends and legislative updates.

Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee
All members of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee are “independent,” in accordance with our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee charter and the applicable NYSE listing standards.
The duties and responsibilities of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee are set forth in its charter, which may be found at

www.brixmor.com under Investors: Governance: Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee Charter, and include among others the following:


establishing the criteria for the selection of new directors;

identifying and recommending to the Board individuals to be nominated as directors;

evaluating candidates for nomination to the Board, including those recommended by stockholders;
13

TABLEOVERSIGHT OF CONTENTS


conducting all necessary and appropriate inquiries into the backgrounds and qualifications of possible candidates;

considering questions of independence and possible conflicts of interest of members of the Board and executive officers;

reviewing and recommending the composition and size of the Board;

overseeing the evaluation of the Board, its committees, as applicable, and management; and

recommending members of the Board to serve on the committees of the Board and, where appropriate, recommending the removal of any member of any committee.
Oversight of Risk Management
RISK MANAGEMENT

The Board exercises oversight of risk management related to us and our business and accomplishes this oversight through the regular reporting by the Audit Committee. The Audit Committee represents the Board by periodically reviewing our accounting, reporting and financial practices, including the integrity of our financial statements, the surveillance ofour administrative and financial controls, and our compliance with legal and regulatory requirements.

Through its regular meetings with management, including the finance, legal, and internal audit functions, the Audit Committee reviews and discusses all significant areas of our business and summarizes for the Board all areas of risk and the appropriatevarious mitigating factors. In addition, our Board receives periodic detailed operatingfinancial and operational performance reviews from management.

Executive Sessions
Executive sessions, which are meetings of the non-management members of the Board, are regularly scheduled throughout the year. In addition, at least once a year, the independent directors meet in a private session that excludes management and non-independent directors. In accordance with our
Corporate Governance, the independent directors have elected Mr. Rahm from among themselves to serve as the Presiding Independent Director to call and preside at executive sessions. The Audit Committee also meets regularly in executive session.
Committee Charters and Corporate Governance Guidelines

COMMITTEE CHARTERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE GUIDELINES

Our commitment to good corporate governance is reflected in our Corporate Governance Guidelines, which describe the Board’s views on a wide range of governance topics. These Corporate Governance Guidelines are reviewed from time to time by the Board and, to the extent deemed appropriate in light of emerging practices, revised accordingly, upon recommendation to and approval by the Board.

Our Corporate Governance Guidelines, our Audit, Compensation, and Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee charters, and other corporate

governance information are available on the Governance page of the Investors section on our website atwww.brixmor.com. Any stockholder also may request them in print, without charge, by contacting the Secretary at Brixmor Property Group Inc., 450 Lexington Avenue, New York, New York 10017.
Stock Ownership

EXECUTIVE SESSIONS

Executive sessions, which are meetings of the non-management members of the Board, are regularly scheduled throughout the year. In addition, at least once a year, the independent directors meet in a private session that excludes management and non-independent directors. In accordance with our Corporate Governance Guidelines,

the independent directors have elected Mr. Rahm from among themselves to serve as the Presiding Independent Director to call and preside at executive sessions. The Audit and Compensation Committees also meet regularly in executive sessions.

STOCK OWNERSHIP GUIDELINES

The Board has implemented stock ownership guidelines, which are included in our Corporate Governance Guidelines referenced above. Each senior officer (our chief executive officer, chief financial officer and each executive vice president) is expected to own common stock or common stock equivalents equalThe Board may, in market value to a specified multiple of his or her annual base

salary. The guideline for our chief executive officer is six times his or her base salary, for our chief financial officer is four times his or her base salary, and for the other senior officers is three times his or her base salary. New officers, including our Chief Executive Officer and President, Chief Financial Officer and Chief Investment Officer, that are subjectits sole discretion, grant exceptions to the ownership
guidelines outlined below.

BRIXMOR PROPERTY GROUPï2020 PROXY STATEMENTïPAGE 23

14

guidelines are expected to be in compliance by the fifth anniversary of their appointment to the position that results in application of the ownership guidelines. Each of our current senior officers, other than our Chief Financial Officer and Chief Investment Officer, who have until May 2021 to own the requisite shares of common stock or common stock equivalents under the ownership guidelines, currently owns shares of common stock or common stock equivalents equal to or greater than their respective ownership guideline.
The Board has also established common stock ownership guidelines for our independent directors. Each independent director is expected to own shares
of our common stock or common stock equivalents with an aggregate market value not less than five times the cash portion of such independent director’s annual board fee for the preceding year (exclusive of committee or chairperson fees) within five years of joining the Board.

GUIDELINES FOR SENIOR OFFICERS

·Each senior officer (our Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and each Executive Vice President) is expected to own common stock or common stock equivalents equal in market value to a specified multiple of his or her annual base salary as outlined below:

6x

Multiple of base salary

Chief Executive Officer

4x

Multiple of base salary

Chief Financial Officer

3x

Multiple of base salary

All other senior officers

·New officers that are subject to the ownership guidelines are expected to be in compliance by the fifth anniversary of their appointment to the position that results in application of the ownership guidelines

·Each of our named executive officers currently owns shares of common stock or common stock equivalents equal to or greater than their respective ownership guideline

GUIDELINES FOR INDEPENDENT DIRECTORS

·Each independent director is expected to own common stock or common stock equivalents equal in market value to five times the cash portion of such independent director’s annual Board fee for the preceding year (exclusive of committee or chairperson fees) within five years of joining the Board

·Each independent director that has served on the board for five years owns shares of common stock or common stock equivalents equal to or greater than this ownership guideline

For purposes of these stock ownership guidelines applicable to both senior officers and independent directors, (i) restricted stock and (ii) earned restricted stock units, which are only subject to a time vesting requirement, shall beare counted toward such requirement. The Board may, in its sole discretion, grant exceptions to the above guidelines.

Code of Business Conduct and Ethics and Code of Conduct for Senior Financial Officers

CODE OF BUSINESS CONDUCT AND ETHICS AND CODE OF CONDUCT FOR SENIOR FINANCIAL OFFICERS

We have a Code of Business Conduct and Ethics which applies to all directors, officers and employees of the Company and a Code of Conduct for Senior Financial Officers which applies to our principal executive officer, principal financial officer and principal accounting officer or controller and persons performing similar functions. Each of these codes is available on our internet websitewww.brixmor.com under Investors: Governance.

The Code of Business Conduct and Ethics sets forth our policies and expectations on a number of topics, including conflicts of interest, compliance with laws (including insider trading laws), use of our assets, and business conduct and fair dealing. The Code of Conduct for Senior Financial Officers satisfies the requirements for a code of ethics, as defined by Item 406 of Regulation S-K promulgated by the SEC. The Company will disclose within four business days any substantive changes in or any waivers of the Code of Business Conduct and Ethics or Code of Conduct for Senior Financial Officers granted to our principal executive officer, principal financial officer, principal accounting officer or controller, or persons performing similar functions, by posting such information on our website as set forth above rather than by filing a Form 8-K.

website.

BRIXMOR PROPERTY GROUPï2020 PROXY STATEMENTïPAGE 24

As described in our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics, the Company’s directors, officers and employees are provided with three avenues through which they can report violations or suspected violations with respect to accounting or auditing matters: a toll-free phone number, in writing, and a website. The toll-free phone number for directors, officers and employees is available 24 hours a day, seven days a week. Directors, officers and employees may report any violation of the Code of Business Conduct and Ethics that does not concern accounting or auditing matters either in writing or in person. Violations or suspected violations of the Code of Conduct for Senior Financial Officers must be reported to the Company’s General Counsel or the Chairman of the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors and may be made in person, in writing or through a toll-free phone number. Directors, officers and employees can choose to remain anonymous in reporting violations or suspected violations. In addition, we maintain a formal non-retaliation policy that prohibits action or retaliation against any director, officer or employee who makes a report in good faith even if the facts alleged are not confirmed by subsequent investigation.

Director Nomination Process

DIRECTOR NOMINATION PROCESS

The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee weighs the characteristics, experience, independence and skills of potential candidates for election to the Board and recommends nominees for election as directors to the Board. In considering candidates for the Board, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee also assesses overall Board composition considerations, including the importance of diversified Board membership, in terms of both the individuals involved and their various experiences and areas of expertise (although

the Board does not have(including expertise that could qualify a formal diversity policy)director as an “audit committee financial expert” under SEC rules), compliance with New York Stock ExchangeNYSE and SEC boardBoard and committeeCommittee independence requirements, as applicable, and the size of the Board. As the application of these factors involves the exercise of judgment, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee does not have a standard set of fixed qualifications that is applicable to all director candidates, although the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee does at a minimum assess each candidate’s strength of character, mature judgment,
15

familiarity with our business and industry, independence of thought and his or her ability to work collegially with the other members of the Board. In identifying prospective director candidates, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee may seek referrals from other members of the Board, management, stockholders and other sources. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee may also, may, but need not, retain a search firm in order to assist it in identifying candidates to serve as directors of the Company. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee utilizes the same criteria for evaluating candidates regardless of the source of the referral.

When considering director candidates, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee seeks individuals with backgrounds and qualities that, when combined with those of our incumbent directors, provide a blend of skills and experience to further enhance the Board’s effectiveness.

In connection with its annual recommendation of a slate of nominees, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee may also assess the contributions of those directors recommended for re-election in the context of the Board evaluation process and other perceived needs of the Board.

BRIXMOR PROPERTY GROUPï2020 PROXY STATEMENTïPAGE 25

When considering whether the directors and nominees have the experience, qualifications, attributes and skills, taken as a whole, to enable the Board to satisfy its oversight responsibilities effectively in light of the Company’s business, and structure, the Board focused primarily on the information discussedcontained in each of the boardBoard member’s biographical information set forth above.

Each of the Company’s directors possesses high ethical standards, acts with integrity and exercises careful, mature judgment. Each isDirectors:

·Possess high ethical standards

·Act with integrity

·Exercise careful, mature judgement

·Is committed to employing his or her skills and abilities to aid the long-term interests of the Company’s stakeholders

·Is knowledgeable and experienced in one or more business, government, or civic endeavors

·Is familiar with corporate finance and strategic business planning activities unique to publicly-traded companies

In addition, most of the stakeholders of the Company. In addition, ourCompany’s directors are knowledgeable and experienced in one or more business, governmental, or civic endeavors,

which further qualifies them for service as members of the Board. A significant number of our directors possess (i) experience in owning andand/or managing public andor privately held enterprises and are familiar with corporate finance and strategic business planning activities that are unique to publicly-traded companies like ours. Finally, many of our directors possess(ii) substantial expertise in advising and managing companies in various segments of the real estate industry.

In 2018,2020, this process resulted in the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee’s recommendation to the Board, and the Board’s nomination, of the eightnine incumbent directors named in this proxy statement and proposed for election by you at the upcoming Annual Meeting.

The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee will consider director candidates recommended by stockholders. Any recommendation submitted to the Corporate Secretary should be in writing and should include any supporting material the stockholder considers appropriate in support of that recommendation, but must include information that would be required under the rules of the SEC to be included in a proxy statement soliciting proxies for the election of such candidate and a written consent of the candidate to serve as one of our directors if elected. Stockholders wishing to propose a candidate for consideration may do so by submitting the above information to the attention of the Secretary, Brixmor Property Group Inc., 450 Lexington Avenue, New York, New York 10017. All recommendations for nomination received by the Corporate Secretary will be presented to the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee for its consideration.

Stockholders may also nominate qualified candidates for the Board by complyingBoard. To do so, stockholders must comply with the advance notification, timeliness, consent, information and other requirements of our Bylaws regarding director nominations. These requirements are also described under the caption “Stockholder Proposals for the 20192021 Annual Meeting.”

BRIXMOR PROPERTY GROUPï2020 PROXY STATEMENTïPAGE 26

Communications with the Board

COMMUNICATIONS WITH THE BOARD

As described in the Corporate Governance Guidelines, stockholders and other interested parties who wish to communicate with a member or members of the Board, including the Chairman, the Presiding Independent Director or chairperson of the Audit, Compensation, or Nominating and Corporate Governance Committees or to any committee of the Board, or to the non-management or independent directors as a group, may do so by (1) addressing such

communications or concerns to the Board of Directors or any such individual directors or group or committee of directors by either name or title and sending it by mail to by:

·Mail to:

Brixmor Property Group Inc.,

c/o General Counsel

450 Lexington Avenue

New York, New York 10017 or (2) sending an email to PresidingIndependentDirector@brixmor.com.

·

Email to:

PresidingIndependentDirector@brixmor.com

Such communications may be done confidentially or anonymously.

16

TABLEEXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF CONTENTS

Executive Officers of the Company
THE COMPANY

Set forth below is certain information regarding each of our current executive officers, other than Mr. Taylor, whose biographical information is presented under “Nominees for Election to the Board of Directors in 2018.“Director Nominees.

NameAgePrincipal Occupation and Other Information

Angela Aman

38

Age 40

Executive since: 2016

Ms. Aman has served as Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of Brixmor Property Group since May 2016. From August 2015 to May 2016, she was Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Starwood Retail Partners, responsible for strategic planning, implementing and management of all accounting and financial functions, as well as investor relations and partner reporting. From July 2011 to May 2015, she served as the Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of Retail Properties of America, Inc., where she helped oversee the company’scompany's initial public offering and subsequent capital raises, and was responsible for all aspects of accounting, finance, capital markets and information technology. She previously served as a Portfolio Manager with RREEF from July 2005 to July 2011 and started her career in the real estate practice in the investment banking group at Deutsche Bank in 2001. Ms. Aman serves on the Steering Committee for the National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts’ Dividends through Diversity program. She received a B.S. from the Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania.

BRIXMOR PROPERTY GROUPï2020 PROXY STATEMENTïPAGE 27

 

Brian T. Finnegan

37

Age 39

Executive since: 2014

Mr. Finnegan has served as Executive Vice President, Leasing since November 2014. From January 2009 through October 2014, Mr. Finnegan served as our Senior Vice President, Leasing & Redevelopment for the West region. From October 2007 until December 2008, he was Vice President, Redevelopment, and from June 2006 through October 2007 served as Regional Vice President, Leasing. He joined Kramont Realty Trust, a predecessor of Brixmor, in 2004 as a Senior Leasing Associate. Mr. Finnegan serves on the International Council of Shopping Centers’ Open Air Centers Committee. Mr. Finnegan received a B.A. from Duquesne University.

Mark T. Horgan

42

Age 44

Executive since: 2016

Mr. Horgan has served as Executive Vice President, Chief Investment Officer of Brixmor Property Group since May 2016. From 2007 to May 2016, he was a Managing Director and senior member of the retail team at Eastdil Secured, where he advised retail real estate companies in investment underwriting, investor sourcing and capital markets transactions. Prior to joining Eastdil Secured, Mr. Horgan held positions at Federal Realty Investment Trust and Mills Corporation. He received a B.S. in Business Administration from The State University of New York at Buffalo.

Steven F. Siegel

57

Age 59

Executive since: 2007

Mr. Siegel has served as Executive Vice President, General Counsel since April 2007 and also Secretary since May 2007. From March 2002 to April 2007, Mr. Siegel was Executive Vice President of New Plan Excel Realty Trust, Inc. and was its General Counsel since 1991. Mr. Siegel joined New Plan Excel Realty Trust, Inc. in 1991 and was a Senior Vice President from September 1998 to March 2002. Mr. Siegel received a B.S. and a J.D. from St. John’s University.

 

Carolyn Carter Singh

55

Age 57

Executive since: 2010

Ms. Singh has served as Executive Vice President, Chief Talent Officer since January 2017. Ms. Singh previously served as Executive Vice President, Human Resources & Administration from July 2010 until January 2017. From April 2007 through July 2010, Ms. Singh served as our Senior Vice President, Human Resources & Administration. Until April 2007, she was Senior Vice President, Human Resources & Administration of New Plan Excel Realty Trust, Inc., having joined New Plan Excel Realty Trust, Inc. as Director of Human Resources in 2001. Ms. Singh serves on the Action Committee for the NAREIT Dividends through Diversity program. Ms. Singh received a B.A. from Rowan University.

BRIXMOR PROPERTY GROUPï2020 PROXY STATEMENTïPAGE 28

>PROPOSAL NO. 2 – RATIFICATION OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
17

PROPOSAL NO. 2—RATIFICATION OF
INDEPENDENT REGISTERED
PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

The Audit Committee has selected Deloitte & Touche LLP to serve as our independent registered public accounting firm for 2018.2020. Deloitte & Touche LLP has served as our independent registered public accounting firm since May 2015.

Although ratification is not required by our Bylaws or otherwise, the Board is submitting the selection of Deloitte & Touche LLP to our stockholders for ratification because we value our stockholders’ views on the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm. If our stockholders fail to ratify the selection, it will be considered as notice to the Board and the Audit Committee to consider the selection of a different firm. Even if the selection is ratified, the Audit Committee, in its discretion, may select a different independent registered public accounting firm at any time during the year if it determines that such a change would be in the best interests of the Company.

Representatives of Deloitte & Touche LLP are expected to be present at the virtual Annual Meeting. They also will have the opportunity to make a statement if they desire to do so, and they are expected to be available to respond to appropriate questions.

The shares represented by your proxy will be voted for the ratification of the selection of Deloitte & Touche LLP unless you specify otherwise.

Audit and Non-Audit Fees

AUDIT AND NON-AUDIT FEES

In connection with the audit of the 20172019 financial statements, we entered into an agreement with Deloitte & Touche LLP which set forth the terms by which Deloitte & Touche LLP would perform audit services for the Company.

The following table presents fees for professional services rendered by Deloitte & Touche LLP for the audit of our financial statements for 20172019 and 20162018 and fees billed for other services rendered by Deloitte & Touche LLP for those periods:

20172016
Audit Fees(1)$1,444,317$1,696,318
Audit-related fees(2)80,167
Tax fees(3)410,415546,760
All other fees(4)1,8952,000
Total:$1,856,627$2,325,245
(1)
Includes the aggregate fees billed in each of the last two fiscal years for professional services rendered by Deloitte & Touche LLP for the audit of the Company’s annual financial statements and the review of financial statements included in Forms 10-Q and Forms 10-K. The fees are for services that are normally provided by Deloitte & Touche LLP in connection with statutory or regulatory filings or engagements.
(2)
Includes fees billed in each of the last two fiscal years for services performed by Deloitte & Touche LLP that are related to financial reporting attest services that are not required by statute or regulation.
(3)
Includes the aggregate fees billed in each of the last two fiscal years for professional services rendered by Deloitte & Touche LLP for tax compliance, tax advice and tax planning.
(4)
Includes the aggregate fees billed in each of the last two fiscal years for products and services provided by Deloitte & Touche LLP, other than those services described above.

 20192018
Audit fees(1)$1,478,770$1,451,810
Tax fees(2)340,185451,102
Total:$1,818,955$1,902,912

(1)Includes the aggregate fees billed in each of the last two fiscal years for professional services rendered by Deloitte & Touche LLP for the audit of the Company’s annual financial statements and the review of financial statements included in Forms 10-Q and Forms 10-K, including fees related to the issuance of comfort letters and consents. The fees are for services that are normally provided by Deloitte & Touche LLP in connection with statutory or regulatory filings or engagements.
(2)Includes the aggregate fees billed in each of the last two fiscal years for professional services rendered by Deloitte & Touche LLP for tax compliance, tax advice and tax planning.

The Audit Committee considered whether providing the non-audit services shown in this table was compatible with maintaining Deloitte & Touche LLP’s independence and concluded that it was.

BRIXMOR PROPERTY GROUPï2020 PROXY STATEMENTïPAGE 29

18


Consistent with SEC policies regarding auditor independence and the Audit Committee’s charter, the Audit Committee has responsibility for engaging, setting compensation for and reviewing the performance of the independent registered public accounting firm. In exercising this responsibility, the Audit Committee pre-approves all audit and permitted non-audit services provided by any independent registered public accounting firm prior to each engagement.

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS THAT YOU VOTE“FOR” THE RATIFICATION OF DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP AS OUR INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM FOR 2020.

BRIXMOR PROPERTY GROUPï2020 PROXY STATEMENTïPAGE 30

YOUR BOARD OF DIRECTORS UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS THAT YOU VOTE “FOR” THE RATIFICATION OF Deloitte & Touche LLP AS OUR INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM FOR 2018.

19

PROPOSAL NO. 3—NON-BINDING VOTE ON
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

>PROPOSAL NO. 3 – NON-BINDING VOTE ON EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

In accordance with the requirements of Section 14A of the Exchange Act (which was added by the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (the “Dodd-Frank Act”)) and the related rules of the SEC, we are including in these proxy materials a separate resolution, subject to stockholder vote, to approve, in a non-binding, advisory vote, the compensation paid to our named executive officers as disclosed on pages 2234 to 41.56. While the results of the vote are non-binding and advisory in nature, the Board intends to carefully consider the results of this vote.

The text of the resolution in respect of proposal No. 3 is as follows:

RESOLVED, that the compensation paid to the Company’s named executive officers, as disclosed pursuant to Item 402 of Regulation S-K, including the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, compensation tables and any related narrative discussion, is hereby APPROVED.”

In considering their vote, stockholders may wish to review with care the information on the Company’s compensation policies and decisions regarding the named executive officers presented in Compensation Discussion and Analysis on pages 2234 to 31,47, as well as the discussion regarding the Compensation Committee on pages 1221 to 14. The next22. As discussed in Proposal No. 4 below, our Board of Directors is recommending that our stockholders continue to have the opportunity to vote to approve the compensation of our named executive officers every year. We expect that we will conduct the next advisory vote on executive compensation at the 2021 annual meeting of stockholders.”

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS THAT YOU VOTE“FOR” THE APPROVAL OF THE COMPENSATION PAID TO OUR NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS. 

BRIXMOR PROPERTY GROUPï2020 PROXY STATEMENTïPAGE 31

>PROPOSAL NO. 4 – NON-BINDING VOTE ON FREQUENCY OF STOCKHOLDER VOTES ON EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

In accordance with the requirements of Section 14A of the Exchange Act and the related rules of the SEC, we are including in these proxy materials a separate resolution, subject to stockholder vote, to recommend, in a non-binding advisory vote, whether a non-binding stockholder vote to approve the compensation paid to our named executive officers will take place at(that is, votes similar to the 2019 annual meetingnon-binding vote in Proposal No. 3 on page 31) should occur every one, two or three years. While the results of stockholders.the vote are non-binding and advisory in nature, the Board intends to carefully consider the results of the vote.

In considering their vote, stockholders may wish to review with care the information presented in connection with Proposal No. 3 on page 31, the information on the Company’s compensation policies and decisions regarding the named executive officers presented in Compensation Discussion and Analysis on pages 34 to 47, as well as the discussion regarding the Compensation Committee on pages 21 to 22.

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS THAT YOU VOTE“ONE YEAR” WITH RESPECT TO HOW FREQUENTLY A STOCKHOLDER VOTE TO APPROVE, IN A NON-BINDING VOTE, THE COMPENSATION PAID TO OUR NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS SHOULD OCCUR.

BRIXMOR PROPERTY GROUPï2020 PROXY STATEMENTïPAGE 32

YOUR BOARD OF DIRECTORS UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS THAT YOU VOTE “FOR” THE APPROVAL

REPORT OF THE COMPENSATION PAID TO OUR NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS.

Report of the Audit Committee
AUDIT COMMITTEE

The Audit Committee operates pursuant to a charter which is reviewed annually by the Audit Committee. Additionally, a brief description of the primary responsibilities of the Audit Committee is included in this proxy statement under the discussion of “The Board of Directors and Certain Governance Matters—Committee Membership—Audit Committee.” Under the Audit Committee charter, our management is responsible for the preparation, presentation and integrity of our financial statements, the application of accounting and financial reporting principles and our internal controls and procedures designed to assure compliance with accounting standards and applicable laws and regulations. The independent registered public accounting firm is responsible for auditing our financial statements and expressing an opinion as to their conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

In the performance of its oversight function, the Audit Committee reviewed and discussed the audited financial statements of the Company with management and with the independent registered public accounting firm. The Audit Committee also discussed with the independent registered public accounting firm the matters required to be discussed

by Public Company Accounting Oversight Board Auditing Standard No. 16 “Communications with Audit Committees.” In addition, the Audit Committee received the written disclosures and the letter from the independent registered public accounting firm required by applicable requirements of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board regarding the independent registered public accounting firm’s communications with the Audit Committee concerning independence, and discussed with the independent registered public accounting firm their independence.

Based upon the review and discussions described in the preceding paragraph, our Audit Committee recommended to the Board of Directors that the audited financial statements of the Company be included in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 20172019 filed with the SEC.

Submitted by the Audit Committee of the Company’s Board of Directors:

Michael Berman, Chair

Sheryl M. Crosland

Gabrielle Sulzberger

20

TABLEREPORT OF CONTENTS

Report of the Compensation Committee
THE COMPENSATION COMMITTEE

The Compensation Committee has discussed and reviewed the following Compensation Discussion and Analysis with management. Based upon this review and discussion, the Compensation Committee recommended to the Board of Directors that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in this proxy statement and incorporated by reference into the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 20172019 filed with the SEC.

Submitted by the Compensation Committee of the Company’s Board of Directors:

Thomas W. Dickson
Daniel B. Hurwitz

William D. Rahm, Chair

Thomas W. Dickson

Daniel B. Hurwitz

John G. Schreiber

BRIXMOR PROPERTY GROUPï2020 PROXY STATEMENTïPAGE 33

21

>

COMPENSATION OF OUR EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND DIRECTORS

TABLECOMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY OF CONTENTS

Compensation of Our EXECUTIVE Officers
and DirectorS
Compensation Discussion and Analysis
Executive Summary of 2017 Compensation
2019 COMPENSATION

Compensation Year 20172019 (“CY2017”CY2019”) Named Executive Officers


James M. Taylor Jr., our Chief Executive Officer and President

Angela Aman, our Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer

Mark Horgan, our Executive Vice President, Chief Investment Officer

Steven F. Siegel, our Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary

Brian T. Finnegan, our Executive Vice President, Leasing

·James M. Taylor Jr., our Chief Executive Officer and President

·Angela Aman, our Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer

·Mark T. Horgan, our Executive Vice President, Chief Investment Officer

·Brian T. Finnegan, our Executive Vice President, Leasing

·Steven F. Siegel, our Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary

Purpose of Compensation Program

Our executive compensation program is designed to attract and retain individuals with the qualifications to manage and lead the Company, as well as toand motivate them to develop professionally and contribute to the achievement of our financial and operational goals and ultimately create and grow our equity value.

goals.

Say on Pay

In 2017,2019, stockholders showed support for our executive compensation programs with 86.9%96.7% of the votes cast for the approval of the “say on pay” proposal at our 20172019 annual meeting of stockholders.

Primary Components of Executive Compensation

PRIMARY COMPONENTS OF EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

ComponentFormFormObjective & ExplanationPage
SalaryCash
-

·Base level compensation, rewards day-to-day performance and standard job duties

-

·Reflects level of responsibilities and experience/tenure

40
Annual Bonus (“Bonus”)Cash
-

·Earned for achievement of annual performance objectives

-
2017

·2019 performance objectives were Company financial metrics (75%) and Individual Goals (25%)

-

·Named executive officers have bonus ranges with Threshold, Target and Maximum levels represented as percentages of base salary. Performance below Threshold would result in no bonus paid for the respective hurdle

-
Aids in retention

40
Long Term Incentive (“LTI”)Performance-based restricted stock units (“PRSUs”), service-based RSUs with an outperformance modifier

·PRSUs and the outperformance modifier component of service-based RSUs

-
Motivates motivate executives to focus on longer term value creation and sustained financial performance
-
Provides and longer-term value creation

·Provide alignment of interests with stockholders

-

·Performance for PRSUs geared toward total shareholderstockholder return over a 3-yearthree-year period

-
Aids

·Multi-year vesting periods aid in retention

44

BRIXMOR PROPERTY GROUPï2020 PROXY STATEMENTïPAGE 34

22


Target Pay
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

TARGET PAY

At CY20172019 Target levels, the composition of compensation for our Chief Executive Officer and President and the other named executive officers is as follows, illustrating that our program is heavily weighted toward incentive compensation or pay for performance.

performance-based and equity-based compensation.

Executive Composition of Compensation at CY20172019 Target Levels(1)

[MISSING IMAGE: tv488643_pie-pay.jpg]
(1)

Performance-based and/or equity-based compensation = 84%Performance-based and/or equity-based compensation = 76%

(1)Excludes all compensation included in the “All Other Compensation” column of the “Summary Compensation Table.” For more information about this additional compensation, see “Compensation of Our Officers and Directors—Summary Compensation Table.” Presented based on increased base salaries and/or target bonus levels for Messrs. Taylor, Horgan and Finnegan and Ms. Aman, which increases were effective in March 2019, as if such increases were in effect for the entire year.

Performance-based and/or equity-based compensation included in the “All Other Compensation” column of the “Summary Compensation Table.” For more information about this additional compensation, including payments made pursuant to Mr. Taylor’s employment agreement to purchase Mr. Taylor’s former residence, see “Compensation of Our Officers and Directors—Summary Compensation Table.”

Incentive-based pay for all named executive officers averages 77%79% of total pay
compensation.

BRIXMOR PROPERTY GROUPï2020 PROXY STATEMENTïPAGE 35

Company Performance Versus Metrics

COMPANY PERFORMANCE VERSUS METRICS FOR ANNUAL BONUS PROGRAM

Brixmor’s annual bonus program features multiple performance metrics designed to pay for performance. The financial metrics used are key indicators of the executive team’s effectiveness at leading the broader team in the management of our properties (Same-Property(Same Property Net Operating Income or “SP NOI” or “Same Property NOI”) and our overall business (NAREIT Funds(Funds From Operations or “FFO”)*.

While the LTI program is geared toward relative and absolute total shareholder return (TSR) over a three year period, a portion of the grant under the LTI plan in 2017 included a one-year performance period for certain financial metrics (both SP NOI and FFO) and individual goals.

The followingdiagram below illustrates the achievement level of performance versus financial metrics for Brixmor’s 20172019 annual bonus plan (“Annual Bonus Plan”) and long-term incentive plan.

[MISSING IMAGE: tv488643_chrt-bonus.jpg]
(1)
.

*The Compensation Committee provided that maximum, target and threshold performance levels approved in 20172019 for SP NOI and FFO were to be adjusted in the case of SP NOI, to account for asset sales during CY2017 and, in the case of FFO, to exclude non-routine litigation and investigative legal expenses and other non-routine or one-time expenses. The adjusted performance levels for SP NOI and FFO set forth herein have been approved by the Compensation Committee.

BRIXMOR PROPERTY GROUPï2020 PROXY STATEMENTïPAGE 36

23

Executive Compensation Philosophy and Corporate Governance

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION PHILOSOPHY AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

Our compensation philosophy is based on best practices and our corporate governance standards are designed to align executive compensation with long-term stockholder interests.

WHAT WE DO:

üStructure our Board with experienced leadership including an independent Chairman, a lead Independent Director and knowledgeable committee chairs

üDesign our compensation programs to reflect our culture of pay for performance, with the majority of named executive officer compensation being performance-driven

üConduct an annual “say-on-pay” advisory vote

üUndertake an annual review of compensation strategies and programs by the Compensation Committee, including our compensation risk profile

üSubject incentive compensation, including both cash and equity compensation, to clawback provisions under certain circumstances

üHave robust stock ownership guidelines for our executive officers and directors

üEnsure our LTI program drives long term value creation and aligns interests of executives and stockholders, with a significant portion of LTI earned based on achievement of performance metrics

WHAT WE DO NOT DO:

XOffer excessive perquisites or special health and welfare plans to executives

XGuarantee salary / bonus increases

XAllow hedging and pledging of Company stock

XHave single trigger cash severance payments in the event of a change-in-control

XProvide excise tax gross-ups

XEncourage unreasonable risk-taking through compensation

What we do:

BRIXMOR PROPERTY GROUPï2020 PROXY STATEMENTïPAGE 37


Structure our Board with experienced leadership including an independent Chairman, a Lead Independent Director and knowledgeable committee chairs.

The Compensation Committee conducts regular reviews of compensation strategies and programs, including our compensation risk profile, ensuring policies and programs do not create risks that are reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on the Company.

The Compensation Committee directly retains the compensation consultant, FPL Associates, and the consultant performs no other services for management.

Compensation programs are designed to reflect our culture of pay for performance—the majority of the named executive officers’ Target pay is performance-driven.

We have robust stock ownership guidelines for our executive officers and directors.

Ensure our LTI program drives long term value creation and aligns interests of executives and stockholders, with a significant portion of LTI earned based on achievement of performance metrics.
-
Once awards are earned, vesting occurs over multiple years as a form of retention.
-
Dividends on restricted stock units are only paid on earned units and accrue during the vesting period.
-
Program contains a claw back provision.
What we do not do:
X
We do not offer excessive perquisites or special health and welfare plans to executives.
X
Policy prohibits named executive officers and Board members from engaging in any hedging transactions with respect to equity securities of the Company held by them, which includes the purchase of any financial instrument designed to hedge or offset any decrease in the market value of such equity securities.
Executive Compensation Objectives and Philosophy

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION OBJECTIVES AND PHILOSOPHY

Our primary executive compensation objectives are to:


attract, retain and motivate senior management leaders who are capable of advancing our mission and strategy and ultimately maintain and grow our long-term equity value;

reward senior management in a manner aligned with our financial performance and individual goals; and

align senior management’s interests with our equity owners’ long-term interests through equity participation and ownership.

·Attract, retain and motivate executives who are capable of advancing our mission and strategy and ultimately maintain and grow our long-term equity value

·Reward executives in a manner aligned with our financial performance and individual goals; and

·Align executives’ interests with our equity owners’ long-term interests through equity participation and ownership

To achieve our objectives, we deliver executive compensation through a combination of the following components: (1) base salary; (2) annual cash incentive compensation;bonus; (3) long-term equity compensation;LTI; (4) other employee benefits and perquisites; and (5) severance benefits.

Say-on-Pay and Say-on-Frequency Votes

SAY-ON-PAY AND SAY-ON-FREQUENCY VOTES

Each year, the Compensation Committee considers the outcome of the stockholder advisory vote on executive compensation when making future decisions relating to the compensation of our named executive officers and our executive compensation program and policies. In 2017,2019, stockholders showed support for our executive compensation programs, with 86.9%96.7% of the votes cast for the approval of the “say-on-pay” proposal at our 20172019 annual meeting of stockholders. The Compensation Committee believes that this support is attributable to the Compensation Committee’s commitment to continuing the alignment of our named executive officers’ compensation with the Company’s performance.

In light of

SEC rules require the voting results with respect tovote on the frequency of stockholder votes on executive compensation to be held at least once every six years. This vote was previously held at the 2014 annual meeting of stockholders,stockholders. Following such vote, the Board decided that Brixmor willwould hold an advisory vote on the compensation of named executive officers at each annual meeting of stockholders until the next required vote on the frequency of stockholder votes on executive compensation. AsThis year, we will again hold a stockholder vote on the Dodd-Frank Act requires that suchfrequency of stockholder votes on frequency be held at least onceexecutive compensation. Our Board is recommending that stockholders vote to continue to hold the advisory vote every six years, we currently expectyear. For more information, see “Proposal No. 4—Non-Binding Vote on Frequency of Stockholder Votes on Executive Compensation.”

CLAWBACK POLICY

The Compensation Committee has implemented a clawback policy, pursuant to which the next stockholder vote on frequencyCompany may seek repayment of cash and equity incentive compensation paid to occur atexecutive officers under certain circumstances. If the Company’s financial results (including GAAP financial statements or non-GAAP financial measures) are restated, the Compensation Committee may recover any incentive compensation received by any covered person during the fiscal years pertaining by the restatement that was in excess of the amount that otherwise would have been paid, giving effect to the restated results.

BRIXMOR PROPERTY GROUPï2020 annual meeting.PROXY STATEMENTïPAGE 38

If the Compensation Determination Process

Committee determines that any covered person has committed fraud or intentional misconduct that either constitutes a violation of law or material breach of Company policy or that could reasonably be expected to result in significant reputational or financial harm to the Company, the Compensation Committee may recover up to 100% of any incentive compensation received by such covered person in the fiscal year during which such misconduct occurred.

COMPENSATION DETERMINATION PROCESS

Role of the Compensation Committee and Management

The Compensation Committee of our Board is responsible for determining the compensation of our Chief Executive Officer and our other named executive

24

officers. At the beginning of each performance cycle, the Compensation Committee approves financial goals designed to align executive pay with company performance and stockholder interests, provide competitive pay opportunities dependent on company performance, retain talent, grow stockholder value and mitigate material risk. The Compensation Committee has the authority to engage its own advisors to assist in carrying out its responsibilities.

In 2017,2019, Mr. Taylor, our President and Chief Executive Officer, worked with the Compensation Committee in managing our executive compensation program and he attended meetings of the Compensation Committee. Because of his daily involvement with the executive team, our President and Chief Executive Officer made recommendations to the Compensation Committee regarding compensation for the named executive officers other than himself.

Role of the Compensation Consultant
For 2017, we engaged a compensation consultant, FPL. All executive compensation services provided by FPL were conducted under the direction or authority of the Compensation Committee, and all work performed by FPL was pre-approved by the Compensation Committee. FPL’s services to the Compensation Committee were to provide
compensation consulting services which included general involvement and support on compensation related matters, including assessment of the Company’s long-term incentive compensation program, as well as reports for market trends and legislative updates.

Use of Comparative Market Data

The total potential compensation for our executive officers is established based on the scope of his or her individual responsibilities and contributions to our performance taking into account competitive market compensation paid for similar positions. Our Compensation benchmarkingCommittee determines appropriate levels of total compensation for 2017 was performed using NAREIT’s 2016 Compensationour named executive officers by applying their individual understanding, experiences and Benefits Survey, which was conducted by FPL,judgments in the national marketplace of senior level real estate positions and contained data on base salaries, total annual cash compensation, long-term incentive awardsrelated industry pay in both public and total remunerationprivate companies that may compete for our executives while also considering the relative importance of various positions at the 25th percentile, 50th percentile, averageCompany given our business plan and 75th percentile.organization compared with the business plans of our major competitors. The Compensation Committee inalso consults compensation surveys prepared by FPL Associates for NAREIT to confirm its discretion in setting theassessment of appropriate market compensation elements and levels for theour named executive officers, took this data into consideration. reviewing the information reported for each position by 126 real estate investment trusts (“REITs”) that participated in the latest survey, including the 31 retail focused REITs that participated in the survey. An individual compensation package is then created for each named executive officer using a combination of base salary, annual cash bonus and long-term equity incentives to provide the appropriate level of potential total annual compensation and the right balance of fixed versus at-risk compensation.

Actual compensation of our named executive officers may be higher or lower than the compensation for executives in similar positions at comparable companies based on the performance, skills, experience and specific role of the named executive officer in the organization.

BRIXMOR PROPERTY GROUPï2020 PROXY STATEMENTïPAGE 39

Compensation Risk Management

The Public REIT Peer Group consistsCompensation Committee, in consultation with the Company, reviews the Company's policies and procedures with respect to risk assessment and risk management for compensating all employees of 12 companies comparablethe Company, including non-executive employees, on an annual basis and periodically reports its findings to Brixmor in terms of property focus, size and/or geography. In 2017, the Public REIT Peer Group included:

Public REIT Peer Group
AvalonBay Communities, Inc.Host Hotels & Resorts, Inc.
CBL & Associates Properties, Inc.Kimco Realty Corporation
DDR Corp.Macerich Company
Digital Realty Trust, Inc.Regency Centers Corporation
Equity One, Inc.Taubman Centers, Inc.
Federal Realty Investment TrustWeingarten Realty Investors
Board. Based on this assessment, the Compensation Elements
Committee does not believe there are any risks from the Company's compensation policies and practices for its employees that are reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on the Company.

COMPENSATION ELEMENTS

Base Salary

Base salary compensates our executives for performing the day-to-day requirements of their positions and provides them with a minimum level of cash income predictability and stability with respect to a portion of their total compensation. We believe that the level of a named executive officer’s base salary should reflect that named executive officer’s performance, experience and breadth of responsibilities, salaries for similar positions within the community and in our industry, generally, and any other factors relevant to that particular job. The

minimum base salary payable to each named executive officer is set by the terms of an employment agreement entered into with each named executive officer, the material terms of which are summarized in the “Narrative Disclosure to Summary Compensation Table and Grants of Plan-Based Awards Table—Employment Agreements with Our Named Executive Officers” below. Each named executive officer is reviewed annually and is eligible for a discretionary annual merit increase. Base salaries may also be adjusted at other times to deal with competitive pressures or changes in job responsibilities.
25

The following table reflects the base salaries of our named executive officers at the end of 2017.

NameBase Salary as of
December 31, 2017
James M. Taylor Jr.$800,000
Angela Aman$500,000
Mark Horgan$475,000
Steven F. Siegel$450,000
Brian T. Finnegan$375,000
2019.

NameBase Salary as of
December 31, 2019
James M. Taylor Jr.$950,000
Angela Aman$550,000
Mark T. Horgan$525,000
Brian T. Finnegan$500,000
Steven F. Siegel$450,000

Annual Cash IncentiveBonus Plan Compensation

In order to motivate our named executive officers to achieve near-term performance goals and tie a significant portion of their cash compensation to actual performance, each named executive officer is eligible for annual cash incentive awards under the Annual Bonus Plan based on achievement of corporate financial targets (75% of the bonus) and individual qualitative goals (25% of the bonus), each

set at the beginning of a fiscal year, with the threshold, target and maximum payout amounts based on a percentage of the named executive officer’s base salary. The named executive officers’ threshold, target and maximum payout amounts were as follows based on the following percentages provided in their respective employment agreements.
determined by the Compensation Committee.

BRIXMOR PROPERTY GROUPï2020 PROXY STATEMENTïPAGE 40

NameThresholdTargetMaximum
James M. Taylor100%125%200%
Angela Aman56%75%100%
Mark Horgan56%75%100%
Steven F. Siegel49%65%85%
Brian T. Finnegan45%60%85%

NameThresholdTargetMaximum
James M. Taylor Jr.112.5%150%200%
Angela Aman75%100%125%
Mark T. Horgan75%100%125%
Brian T. Finnegan56%75%100%
Steven F. Siegel49%65%85%

Corporate Financial Metrics

For fiscal 2017,2019, the two corporate goals under the Annual Bonus Plan was based on our achievement(75% of two corporate financial metrics, expressed on a per share basis:the bonus) were SP NOI growth and FFO.FFO per share. SP NOI represents net operating income ofgrowth is calculated (using properties owned for the entirety of twoboth periods and excluding properties under development.development and completed development properties which have been stabilized for less than one year) as total property revenues (base rent, expense reimbursements, adjustments for revenues deemed uncollectible, ancillary and other rental income, percentage rents and other revenues) less direct property operating expenses (operating costs, real estate taxes and provision for doubtful accounts). SP NOI also excludes income/(i) corporate level expenses (including general and administrative), (ii) lease termination fees, (iii) straight-line rental income, net, (iv) accretion of above- and below- market leases and rent inducements, (v) straight-line ground rent expense, and (vi) income / expense associated with the Company’s captive insurance entity, as well ascompany. FFO per share represents, on a per share basis, net income (loss), calculated in accordance with GAAP, excluding (i) lease termination fees, (ii) straight-line rental income, net, (iii) amortization of above- and below-market rent and tenant inducements, net, (iv) fee income, (v) straight-line ground rent expense, (vi) depreciation and amortization (vii) impairmentrelated to real estate, (ii) gains and losses from the sale of certain real estate assets, (viii) general(iii) gains and administrative expenses, (ix) other expenses, (x) equitylosses from change in incomecontrol, and (iv) impairment write-downs of certain real estate assets and investments in entities when the impairment is directly attributable to decreases in the Company’svalue of depreciable real estate held by the entity, and after adjustments for unconsolidated joint venture, (xi) gainventures calculated to reflect FFO on disposition of the Company’s unconsolidated joint venture interest, (xii) net income attributable to non-controlling interests and (xiii) any preferred stock dividends. FFO represents net income, as adjusted for (i) gain on disposition of operating properties, (ii) gain on disposition of unconsolidated joint venture interest, (iii) real estate-related depreciation and amortization from continuing operations, (iv) real estate-related depreciation and amortization from the Company’s unconsolidated joint venture and (v) impairment of operating properties.same basis. In addition, when setting the metrics for FFO per share achievement under the Annual Bonus Plan, the Compensation Committee determined that reported FFO would be adjusted to

exclude non-routine litigation and investigativeother non-routine legal expenses.
The Annual Bonus Plan for 2017 was structured to reward Messrs. Taylor, Horgan, Siegelexpenses and Finnegan and Ms. Aman based on the foregoing two corporate financial metrics (75% of the bonus) and based on individual performance criteria (25% of the bonus).
any other non-routine or one-time expenses, in its discretion.

Individual Qualitative Goals

Accomplishments

Mr. Taylor’s individual goals included providing leadership and direction in establishing and implementing the Company’s overall strategic business plan, including attracting and upgrading senior level management talent across the organization, establishing the Company’s enhanced redevelopment and capital recycling program, enhancing leasing deal flow process in order to accelerate rent commencement dates, strengthening the Company’s balance sheet, implementing higher property management standards, and continued investor outreach. accomplishments included:

·Providing leadership and direction in establishing and implementing the Company’s overall strategic business plan and operational accomplishments

·Achieving sector-leading leasing activity with a focus on driving occupancy, in particular small shop occupancy, and intrinsic lease terms

·Improving the overall quality, credit, depth and relevancy of the Company’s tenant base

·Stabilizing over $160 million of reinvestment activity, while continuing to grow the in process reinvestment pipeline

BRIXMOR PROPERTY GROUPï2020 PROXY STATEMENTïPAGE 41

·Completing over $300 million of dispositions and $79 million of acquisitions

·Publishing the inaugural Corporate Responsibility report and expanding ESG efforts across the organization and portfolio

·Broadening and diversifying the Company’s institutional investor stockholder base through targeted new investor outreach

Ms. Aman’s goals included the successful remediation of the Company’s material weakness related to the Audit Committee investigation and the resulting removal of the negative outlooks in the Company’s credit ratings with Moody’s and S&P, enhancement of the Company’s corporate and property accounting teams and continued enhancement of the Company’s internal control environment, improvement in the Company’s budgeting and forecasting processes, completion of

26

two opportunistic bond offerings in an aggregate amount of  $900 million and execution of a $300 million seven-year unsecured term loan effectively extending the Company’s weighted average debt maturity schedule, improvement in the Company’s leverage ratios and establishment and implementation of the Company’s $400 million share repurchase program. accomplishments included:

·Extending the duration of the Company’s debt and eliminating near term maturities

·Completing opportunistic capital raises, which ultimately included $750 million of unsecured notes

·Improving the Company’s balance sheet metrics, resulting in the Company’s first ratings momentum since 2017

·Broadening and diversifying the Company’s institutional investor stockholder base through targeted new investor outreach

·Significantly enhancing the Company’s budgeting and forecasting processes

Mr. Horgan’s individual goals in 2017 included his leadership in the identification, underwriting, negotiation and closing of four shopping center acquisitions and five outparcel acquisitions totaling $190 million across core markets and 32 shopping center dispositions for more than $409 million of gross proceeds, his leadership as chair of the Company’s investment committee in implementing updated investment committee processes for Company capital commitments, including property acquisitions and dispositions, redevelopment and major leases, his hiring and training of regional transactions teams to drive stronger, more efficient and more local capital allocation processes and his development of processes to identify, track and execute on dispositions in an orderly process and identify near-term opportunities (including providing the opportunity for regional leasing teams to unlock more than $20 million in incremental value through leasing transactions prior to asset disposition in 2017). accomplishments included:

·Identifying, underwriting, negotiating and closing on approximately $80 million of acquisitions in targeted core markets

·Partnering with the Company’s regional Presidents to further grow the Company’s targeted acquisition opportunities by more than 15 percent

·Directing the disposition of 24 assets aggregating approximately 3.1 million square feet for gross proceeds of over $300 million, including assets with demographics well below portfolio averages

·Leading the Company’s Investment Committee which reviewed all major leases, redevelopments and property transactions

Mr. Finnegan’s accomplishments included:

·Overseeing and leading the execution of 3.5 million square feet of new leases

·Increasing overall leased occupancy, in particular small shop occupancy

·Executing strategic leases to facilitate key redevelopment projects

·Driving meaningful growth in both in place and new lease annual base rent per square foot

·Broadening and strengthening the Company’s tenant base, while reducing exposure to watchlist tenants

·Rolling out a new Company branding strategy and website

·Continuing to grow the Company’s specialty and outparcel leasing programs

·Reducing the time required in the lease negotiation process by implementing a short form lease

BRIXMOR PROPERTY GROUPï2020 PROXY STATEMENTïPAGE 42

Mr. Siegel’s individual goals in 2017 included successful settlement of the class action litigation and

oversight of the governmental investigations stemming from the prior Audit Committee investigation, assistance and oversight in the completion of certain critical lease transactions and shopping center acquisitions and dispositions, effective cost saving renewals of the Company’s insurance programs and general oversight of all legal matters affecting the company. Mr. Finnegan’s individual goals in 2017 included his oversight of the execution of new leases covering over 3.2 million square feet of gross leasable area, creation of over $40 million in new base rent from leasing transactions, driving meaningful growth in both in place and new lease annual base rent per square foot, broadening and strengthening the Company’s tenant base by adding new and exciting retailers to the Company’s portfolio, rolling out a new leasing compensation plan to further align leasing agent goals with our overall goals, enhancing the Company’s specialty and outparcel leasing program and his oversight of upgrades in the Company’s deal flow systems.
accomplishments included:

·Overseeing several critical new and renewal lease transactions

·Monitoring legal aspects of all acquisitions and dispositions

·Renewing on favorable terms the Company’s liability and property insurance policies

·Overseeing the Company’s risk management efforts

·Providing general oversight of all legal matters affecting the company

In connection with the Annual Bonus Plan for 2017,2019, the Compensation Committee determined that each of Messrs. Taylor, Horgan, SiegelFinnegan and Finnegan achieved maximum performanceSiegel and Ms. Aman achieved between target and maximum performance with respect to their individual performance goals.

2017

2019 Annual Bonus Plan Metrics and Weight

The following table shows the weighting assigned to each of the named executive officers for each fiscal 20172019 Annual Bonus Plan performance metric.

NameSP NOIFFOIndividual
Component
James M. Taylor37.5%37.5%25%
Angela Aman37.5%37.5%25%
Mark Horgan37.5%37.5%25%
Steve F. Siegel37.5%37.5%25%
Brian T. Finnegan37.5%37.5%25%
2017

NameSP NOIFFOIndividual
Component
James M. Taylor Jr.37.5%37.5%25%
Angela Aman37.5%37.5%25%
Mark T. Horgan37.5%37.5%25%
Brian T. Finnegan37.5%37.5%25%
Steven F. Siegel37.5%37.5%25%

2019 Annual Bonus Plan Corporate Financial Performance Targets and Results

The table below sets forth on a per share basis, the threshold, target, and maximum performance goals for each fiscal 20172019 Annual Bonus Plan corporate financial metric, as well as actual per share performance results for 2017.2019. Actual payouts between the threshold, target and maximum amounts were interpolated on a linear basis.

Metric(1)
2017
Threshold
2017 Target2017
Maximum
2017 Results
SP NOI$2.85$2.87$2.88$2.87
FFO$2.05$2.09$2.12$2.11
(1)
The Compensation Committee provided that maximum, target and threshold performance levels approved in 2017 for SP NOI and FFO were to be adjusted, in the case of SP NOI, to account for asset sales during CY2017 and, in the case of FFO, to exclude non-routine litigation and investigative legal expenses. The adjusted performance levels for SP NOI and FFO set forth herein have been approved by the Compensation Committee.
27

2017

Metric(1)2019
Threshold
2019
Target
2019
Maximum
2019
Results
SP NOI Growth2.25%3.00%3.25%3.4%
FFO per share(1)$1.84$1.89$1.94$1.92(1)

(1)The Compensation Committee provided that maximum, target and threshold performance levels approved in 2019 for FFO were to be adjusted to exclude non-routine litigation and investigative legal expenses and other non-routine or one-time expenses. The adjusted performance levels for FFO set forth herein have been approved by the Compensation Committee.

2019 Annual Bonus Plan Awards Paid

As detailed in the following table, actual amounts paid under the Annual Bonus Plan for fiscal 20172019 were as follows:

Name2017 Base
Salary
Target Bonus
as a
Percentage of
Base Salary
Target Bonus
Potential
Combined
Achievement
Factor as a
Percentage of
Target
2017 Annual
Bonus
James M. Taylor Jr.$800,000125%$1,000,000130%$1,300,750
Angela Aman$500,00075%$375,000113%$422,031
Mark Horgan$475,00075%$356,250117%$415,773
Steven F. Siegel$450,00065%$292,500116%$337,613
Brian T. Finnegan$375,00060%$225,000117%$263,180

BRIXMOR PROPERTY GROUPï2020 PROXY STATEMENTïPAGE 43

Name2019
Base
Salary
Target Bonus
as a
Percentage
of Base
Salary
Target
Bonus
Potential(1)
Combined
Achievement
Factor as a
Percentage
of Target(1)
Actual
2019
Annual
Bonus
James M. Taylor Jr.(1)$950,000150%$1,425,0001.23%$1,752,666
Angela Aman(1)$550,000100%$550,0001.15%$630,952
Mark T. Horgan(1)$525,000100%$525,0001.13%$593,871
Brian T. Finnegan(1)$500,00075%$375,0001.25%$470,162
Steven F. Siegel$450,00065%$292,5001.24%$364,050

(1)Combined Achievement Factor as a Percentage of Target is calculated by dividing the Actual 2019 Annual Bonus by the Target Bonus Potential, which was increased for Messrs. Taylor, Horgan and Finnegan and Ms. Aman effective in March 2019. Target Bonus Potential is presented as if the 2019 compensation changes were in effect for the entire year, however, the Actual 2019 Annual Bonus for Messrs. Taylor, Horgan, and Finnegan and Ms. Aman, were pro-rated based on the effective date of 2019 compensation changes, which included changes in base salary and target bonus percentages.

Long-Term Equity Compensation

The Company grants long-term incentive awards under its 2013 Omnibus Incentive Plan (the “Equity Incentive Plan”)to align the Company’s executives with performance measurement primarily focused onstockholder interests, support long-term value creation and promote the retention and stability of our executive management team.

Under the current executive long-term incentive program, 60% of total shareholder return over a three-year period. Such equity-basedequity awards received by the named executive officers are granted in the form of restricted stock units (“RSUs”). The Board believes that the Equity Incentive Plan and the awards made thereunder align the Company’s long-term incentive awardsPRSUs with competitive practices and stockholder interests and support the objectives of long-term value creation.

In 2017, the aggregate number of performance-based RSUs granted to our named executive officers assuming that the target level of performance is achieved (with the actual number of RSUs to be earned based on the performance criteria described below) was 151,057 for Mr. Taylor, 50,352 for Ms. Aman, 50,352 for Mr. Horgan, 46,576 for Mr. Siegel, and 25,176 for Mr. Finnegan.
The RSUs (other than certain time-vesting RSUs, which were not granted to the named executive officers in 2017) are each subject to the performance-based and service-based vesting and forfeiture conditions described below.
Terms of the RSUs
The 2017 grants of RSUs were divided into a one-year performance period and a three-year performance measurement period withcommencing in the awards more heavily weighted tocalendar year of grant based on relative total stockholder return (“TSR”) over such period. Performance over the three-year performance period.
Under the terms of the award agreements, each executive can achieve a threshold, target, and maximum number of RSUs in respect of each tranche or performance period. The number of RSUs actually earned for each tranche or performance period is determined based on actual performance during the specified performance period, and the earned RSUs are then further subject to service-based vesting conditions. During 2017, the performancemeasurement period for the one-year performance periodPRSUs (the “Performance Period”) will be measured by the Compensation Committee after the completion of the 2017 award
andPerformance Period (the “Measurement Date”). Of the three-year performance period of the 2015 award were completed. The performance periods that were completed in 2017, as well as the three-year performance period for the 2017 award, are described in more detail below.
Three-Year Performance Periods of 2015 and 2017 Awards
The performance criteria for the three-year performance period of the 2015 award, which comprises two-thirds of such award grant, is relative total shareholder return in relation to a peer index (“Relative TSR”) (60% of such RSUs), absolute total shareholder return (“Absolute TSR”) (20% of such RSUs), and a company-wide performance objective (20% of such RSUs). The performance criteria for the three-year performance period of the 2017 award, which comprises two-thirds of such award grant, is likewise relative total shareholder return in relation to a peer index (“Relative TSR”) (60% of such RSUs), absolute total shareholder return (“Absolute TSR”) (20% of such RSUs), and a company-wide performance objective return on invested capital equal to or in excess of 7.75%) (20% of such RSUs). The three-year performance period of the 2015 award began January 1, 2015 and ended December 31, 2017. The three-year performance period of the 2017 award began January 1, 2017 and ends December 31, 2019. The total number of RSUs that are earned based on the relative and absolute total shareholder return are each based on an achievement factor which, in each case, ranges from a 0% payout for below threshold performance, to 50% for threshold performance, to 100% for target performance, and up to 150% for maximum performance. For actual performance between the specified threshold, target and maximum levels, the resulting achievement percentage will be adjusted on a linear basis. For the three-year performance period of the 2015 award, the Company did not achieve the company-wide performance objective and achieved Relative TSR and Absolute TSR each below threshold performance, and accordingly 0% of such awards were earned. For 2017 RSUsPRSUs that are earned, 50% will vest as ofon the date performance
28

is confirmed by the Compensation Committee following December 31, 2019,Measurement Date and 25% will vest on January 1 2021,of each of the next two succeeding years.

The total number of PRSUs that can be earned is between 0% (for below threshold performance) and 200% (for maximum performance), based on the remaining 25% will vest on January 1, 2022,Company’s TSR performance compared to the constituent companies in each case subject to continued employment.

For the Relative TSR component for both the 2015 award and the 2017 award, we use the FTSE NAREIT
Equity Shopping Center Index (the “Index”) as. If the peer index. No RSUs areCompany’s TSR during the measurement period is negative, the maximum number of PRSUs that may be earned for below-threshold performance and(notwithstanding relative TSR achievement above the target level) is limited to 100% of the target level.

The threshold, target, and maximum performance levels of relative TSR (measured on a compounded annual basis over the relevant measurement period) are:

are as follows:

BRIXMOR PROPERTY GROUPï2020 PROXY STATEMENTïPAGE 44

Level of AchievementRelative TSR AchievedPercentage of Award Earned
Below ThresholdMore than 250 bps below index returnBelow the 37.5th percentile0%
Threshold37.5th percentile50%
TargetThreshold50th percentile250 bps below index return50%100%
Above Target62.5th percentile100 bps above index return100%150%
Maximum75th percentile500 bps over index return150%200%
For

To encourage retention, the Absolute TSR component for bothremaining 40% of total equity awards received by the 2015 award andnamed executive officers are granted in the 2017 award, no RSUs are earned for below-threshold performance and the threshold, target, and maximum performance levels (measuredform of service-based restricted stock units (“Service RSUs”) that vest in three equal annual installments beginning on a compounded annual basis over the relevant measurement period) are:

Level of AchievementAbsolute TSRPercentage of Award Earned
Below Threshold<6.0%0%
Threshold6.0%50%
Target9.0%100%
Maximum12.0%150%
One-Year Performance Period of 2017 Award
The performance criteria for the one-year performance periodJanuary 1 of the 2017succeeding year. In order to incentivize and reward superior performance, the Service RSUs have attached an outperformance modifier, referred to as Outperformance RSUs that can increase the original Service RSU award which comprises one-thirdbased on the Company’s outperformance over a specified measurement period. The number of Outperformance RSUs that may be earned is equal to between zero and 2.00 times the total 2017 award grant, are SP NOI per share (37.5%number of such RSUs),Service RSUs initially granted, based on achievement of specified FFO per share (37.5%growth and Same Property NOI growth hurdles, which were considered at the time of such RSUs) and individual performance goals (25%grant not probable of such RSUs), in each casebeing achieved. The measurement period for the Outperformance RSUs is a three calendar-year period beginning January 1, 2017 andcommencing in the year of grant (except that with respect to the 2018 grants, the Outperformance RSUs have a two-year measurement period ending on December 31, 2017. The total number2020). To the extent granted, 50% of the Outperformance RSUs that are earned basedwill vest on the SP NOI per shareMeasurement Date and FFO per share metrics is based on an achievement factor which, in each case, ranges from a 0% payout for below threshold performance, to 50% for threshold performance, to 100% for target performance, and up to 150% for
maximum performance. For actual performance between the specified threshold, target and maximum levels, the resulting achievement percentage will be adjusted on a linear basis. For RSUs that are earned, 50% became vested as of February 27, 2018, the date performance for the one-year performance period was confirmed by the Compensation Committee, 25% will vest on January 1 of each of the next two succeeding years.

In 2019, the Compensation Committee determined to grant the named executive officers the below number of PRSUs at target level and Service RSUs. There were no grants of Outperformance RSUs since the outperformance measurement period for the 2018 grants ends on December 31, 2020 and the remaining 25% will vest on January 1, 2020, in each case subject to continued employment.

The table below sets forth the threshold, target, and maximum performance goals, on a per share basis,outperformance measurement period for the SP NOI per share2019 grants ends on December 31, 2021, as described above.

Named Executive OfficerTarget PRSUsService RSUs
James M. Taylor Jr.102,97568,649
Angela Aman37,75825,171
Mark T. Horgan36,04124,027
Brian T. Finnegan34,32522,883
Steven F. Siegel28,31818,878

Forfeiture of PRSUs and FFO per shareOutperformance RSUs

In general, unvested PRSUs are forfeited and Outperformance RSUs are not granted to the extent the applicable performance criteria for the one-year performance periodare not achieved as of the 2017 award.

Level of Achievement
SP NOI per share Achieved(1)
Percentage of Award Earned
Below ThresholdLess than $2.850%
Threshold$2.8550%
Target$2.87100%
Maximum$2.88150%
Level of Achievement
FFO per share Achieved(1)
Percentage of Award Earned
Below ThresholdLess than $2.050%
Threshold$2.0550%
Target$2.09100%
Maximum$2.12150%
(1)
The Compensation Committee provided that maximum, target and threshold performance levels approved in 2017 for SP NOI and FFO were to be adjusted, in the caseend of SP NOI, to account for asset sales during CY2017 and, in the case of FFO, to exclude non-routine litigation and investigative legal expenses. The adjusted performance levels for SP NOI and FFO set forth herein have been approved by the Compensation Committee.
29

For the performance period from January 1, 2017 to December 31, 2017, the Company achieved SP NOI per share of  $2.87 resulting in an achievement factor of 100% of the target amount and FFO per share of $2.11 resulting in an achievement factor of 133% of the target amount. The Compensation Committee considered the performance of each of our named executive officers in CY2017 and determined that they each had satisfactory individual performance to entitle them to the individual component under the one-year performance period of the 2017 award.
Forfeiture of RSUs
In general, unvested RSUs are forfeited as of the final calculation date applicable to any award to the extent performance criteria do not result in the RSUs becoming earned andor as of any termination of employment. Upon a termination of employment by the Company without cause, or a resignation by the executive that is as a result of good reason or a retirement (each as defined in the award agreements), a portion of the PRSUs and Outperformance RSUs will be eligible to become earned in the case of PRSUs or granted in the case of Outperformance RSUs

BRIXMOR PROPERTY GROUPï2020 PROXY STATEMENTïPAGE 45

and vested, based on actual performance through the date of termination (or target performance, in the case of company-wide performance objectives or individual performance criteria) and subject to proration based on the number of days during the applicable performance period that the executive was employed.

The foregoing will also be applicable with respect to the PRSUs upon the executive’s retirement (as defined in the award agreements). Upon a change in control during any performance period, a portion of the RSUsPRSUs will become earned and vestedor Outperformance RSUs will be granted based on actual performance through the date of the change in control. In addition, in general, unvested Service RSUs are forfeited upon a termination (orof employment; however, upon a termination of employment by the Company without cause, or a resignation by the executive that is as a result of good reason (each as defined in the award agreements), all unvested Service RSUs will automatically and immediately vest as of the date of termination.

Dividends will be paid currently on unvested Service RSUs. Dividend equivalents will accrue and be paid only on earned PRSUs. Dividend equivalents will only be paid on Outperformance RSUs from and after the date granted.

2017 RSU Awards Performance Determination

The performance criteria for the three-year performance period of the 2017 RSU awards, which performance period began on January 1, 2017 and ended on December 31, 2019, is relative total stockholder return in relation to a peer index (“Relative TSR”) (60% of such RSUs), absolute total stockholder return (“Absolute TSR”) (20% of such RSUs), and a company-wide performance objective (return on invested capital equal to or greater than 7.75%) (20% of such RSUs). The Company achieved Relative TSR at 137.5% of target performance inrelated to the case ofaward, achieved Absolute TSR below threshold performance, and achieved the company-wide performance objectives or individual performance criteria).

objective related to the award. Accordingly, 102.5% of such awards were earned.

Other Employee Benefits &and Perquisites

We provide to all our employees, including our named executive officers, broad-based benefits that are intended to attract and retain employees while providing them with retirement and health and

welfare security. Our named executive officers are eligible to receive the same benefits, including life and health benefits and vacation, holiday and sick time that are available to all employees. Our employees, including the named executive officers, are also eligible to participate in a tax-qualified 401(k) plan. Employees may contribute to the 401(k), on a pre-tax basis, between 0% and 50% of their annual pay, up to the maximum allowable amount permitted by the IRS, and we match 100% of the first 3% of the employee’s annual pay in order to encourage employee participation. Our named executive officers also receive supplemental long-term disability coverage, medical and dental benefits. Messrs. Taylor and Horgan and Ms. Aman also received certain relocation expenses in connection with their recent hires by the Company. These other employee benefits and perquisites are reflected in the “All Other Compensation” column of the “Summary Compensation Table” below and the accompanying footnote. The boardBoard believes that providing modest perquisites is both customary among our peers and necessary for attracting and retaining talent.

Severance Benefits

The boardBoard believes that severance arrangements are necessary to attract and retain the talent required for our long-term success, and views our severance arrangements as recruitment and retention devices that help secure the continued employment and dedication of our named executive officers, including when we are considering strategic alternatives. Pursuant to the terms of their employment agreements, each of our named executive officers has severance protection in the case of specified qualifying termination events. The severance payments under these agreements are contingent upon the affected executive’s compliance with specified post-termination restrictive covenants. See “Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control” for descriptions of payments to be made under these agreements.

BRIXMOR PROPERTY GROUPï2020 PROXY STATEMENTïPAGE 46

Compensation Actions Taken During 2018

COMPENSATION ACTIONS TAKEN DURING 2020

Base Salaries

In February 2018,2020, the Compensation Committee determined that the base salaries of the named executive officers for 20182020 would remain unchanged from 2017, other than Mr. Finnegan, whose base salary for 2018 would increase to $450,000.

2019.

Equity-Based Awards

Beginning with the equity awards granted in February 2018, the Compensation Committee approved the modification of the currently existing
executive long-term incentive program designed to further align the Company’s long-term incentive awards with competitive practices and stockholder interests, support long-term value creation and promote retention and stability of our executive management team.
Under the modified executive long-term incentive program, 60% of total equity awards received by the named executive officers are in the form of performance-based restricted stock units (“PRSUs”) with a three-year performance measurement period based on relative total stockholder return (“TSR”). The
30

total number of PRSUs that can be earned are between 0% (for below minimum performance) and 200% (for maximum performance), based on the Company’s TSR performance compared to the constituent companies in the FTSE NAREIT Shopping Center Index. If the Company’s TSR during the measurement period is negative, the maximum number of PRSUs that may be earned (notwithstanding relative TSR achievement above the target level) is limited to 100% of the target level.
Performance over the three-year measurement period for the PRSUs granted in February 2018 will be measured by the Compensation Committee after December 31, 2020 (the “Measurement Date”). Of the PRSUs that are earned, 50% will vest on the Measurement Date, 25% will vest on January 1, 2022 and 25% will vest on January 1, 2023.
The remaining 40% of total equity awards received by the named executive officers are in the form of service-based restricted stock units (“Service RSUs”) that vest in three equal annual installments beginning on January 1, 2019. The Service RSUs have attached an outperformance modifier that can increase the original award based on our outperformance over a specified measurement period.
For awards made in 2018, the potential to provide an increase to the original Service RSU award to be delivered in additional units (such additional granted units, the “OPRSUs”) will be based on cumulative FFO per share and same-property NOI growth over the period beginning on January 1, 2019 and ending on December 31, 2020. For awards beginning in 2019, the number of OPRSUs to be delivered, if any, will be based on a three-year measurement period. The number of OPRSUs that may be earned is equal to between zero and 2.00 times the number of Service RSUs initially granted, based on achievement of specified outperformance hurdles relative to each of the performance goals. To the extent earned, 50% of the OPRSUs will vest on the Measurement Date, 25% will vest on January 1, 2022 and 25% will vest on January 1, 2023.
In general, unvested PRSUs are forfeited and OPRSUs are not granted to the extent the applicable performance criteria are not achieved as of the end of the performance period and as of any termination of employment. Upon a termination of employment by the Company without cause, or a resignation by the
executive that is as a result of good reason (each as defined in the award agreements), a portion of the PRSUs and OPRSUs will be eligible to become earned in the case of PRSUs or granted in the case of OPRSUs and vested, based on actual performance through the date of termination and subject to proration based on the number of days during the applicable performance period that the executive was employed. The foregoing will also be applicable with respect to the PRSUs upon the executive’s retirement (as defined in the award agreements). Upon a change in control during any performance period, a portion of the PRSUs will become earned or OPRSUs will be granted based on actual performance through the date of the change in control. In addition, in general, unvested Service RSUs are forfeited upon a termination of employment; however, upon a termination of employment by the Company without cause, or a resignation by the executive that is as a result of good reason (each as defined in the award agreements), all unvested Service RSUs will automatically and immediately vest as of the date of termination.
Dividends will be paid currently on unvested Service RSUs. Dividend equivalents will accrue and be paid only on earned PRSUs. Dividend equivalents will only be paid on OPRSUs from and after the date granted.

At the March 2018February 2020 meeting, the Compensation Committee determined to grant the named executive officers the following number of PRSUs at target level and Service RSUs (which are subject to the outperformance modifier), respectively: 113,78091,649 and 75,85361,100 for Mr. Taylor, 37,92733,604 and 25,28422,404 for Ms. Aman, 37,92732,077 and 25,28421,385 for Mr. Horgan, 31,29030,549 and 20,85920,367 for Mr. SiegelFinnegan and 26,54926,730 and 17,69817,821 for Mr. Finnegan. Any OPRSUs granted would be in addition to the above PRSUs and Service RSUs.

Siegel.

Annual Cash IncentiveBonus Plan Financial Metrics

In February 2018,2020, the Compensation Committee determined that the Annual Bonus Plan for fiscal 20182020 will reward our named executive officers that are current employees 75% based on corporateCompany financial metrics and 25% based on individual goals.

BRIXMOR PROPERTY GROUPï2020 PROXY STATEMENTïPAGE 47

The threshold, target and maximum payout amounts will continue to be based on the same percentage of their base salary for fiscal 2018 as in fiscal 2017, other than Mr. Finnegan, whose threshold, target and maximum payout amounts increased to 56%, 75% and 100%, respectively.

31

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION TABLES

SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE OF CONTENTS

Summary Compensation Table

The following table provides summary information concerning compensation paid or accrued by us to or on behalf of Mr. Siegel for 2017, 2016 and 2015 and on behalf of our other named executive officers for 20172019, 2018 and 20162017 for services rendered to us during those fiscal years. Messrs. Taylor, Horgan, Finnegan, and Ms. Aman were not named executive officers in 2015; therefore, in accordance with the SEC’s disclosure rules, information regarding compensation for the year that those individuals were not named executive officers is not included in the table below.

Name and Principal PositionYearSalary
($)
Bonus
($)
Stock
Awards
($)(1)
Option
Awards
($)
Non-Equity
Incentive Plan
Compensation
($)(2)
Change in
Pension Value
and
Nonqualified
Deferred
Compensation
Earnings
($)(3)
All Other
Compensation
($)(4)
Total
($)
James M. Taylor
Chief Executive Officer, President and Director
2017800,0002,999,9921,300,750578,7325,679,474
2016480,000154,9655,965,613940,531116,2837,657,392
Angela Aman
Executive Vice President,
Chief Financial Officer and
Treasurer
2017500,000999,990422,03136,2231,958,244
2016300,0001,930,032298,684108,5962,637,312
Mark T. Horgan
Executive Vice President, Chief Investment Officer
2017475,000999,990415,77333,3181,924,081
2016285,0001,645,619274,965197,3062,402,890
Steven F. Siegel
Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary
2017450,000924,999337,61325,6701,738,282
2016450,00020,000925,494371,36325,3511,792,208
2015450,000891,381337,50024,8531,737,847
Brian T. Finnegan
Executive Vice President, Leasing
2017375,000533,047263,18031,4491,202,676
2016300,000350,184245,71931,775927,678

Name and
Principal Position
YearSalary
($)
Bonus
($)
Stock
Awards
($)(1)
Option
Awards
($)
Non-Equity
Incentive Plan
Compensation
($)(2)
Change in
Pension Value
and
Nonqualified
Deferred
Compensation
Earnings ($)(3)
All Other
Compensation ($)(4)
Total ($)
James M. Taylor Jr.
Chief Executive Officer, President and Director
2019
2018
2017
923,462
800,000
800,000


3,512,804
2,999,994
2,999,992


1,752,666
1,220,425
1,300,750


31,495
30,290
578,732
6,220,427
5,050,709
5,679,474
Angela Aman
Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
2019
2018
2017
541,154
500,000
500,000


1,288,034
999,998
999,990


630,952
420,922
422,031


27,632
30,290
36,223
2,487,772
1,951,210
1,958,244
Mark T. Horgan
Executive Vice President, Chief Investment Officer
2019
2018
2017
516,154
475,000
475,000


1,229,473
999,998
999,990


593,871
399,876
415,773


31,491
30,264
33,318
2,370,989
1,905,138
1,924,081
Brian T. Finnegan
Executive Vice President, Leasing
2019
2018
2017
491,154
450,000
375,000


1,170,935
699,987
533,047


470,162
358,625
263,180


42,287
41,026
31,449
2,174,538
1,549,638
1,202,676
Steven F. Siegel
Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary
2019
2018
2017
450,000
450,000
450,000


966,009
824,997
924,999


364,050
325,564
337,613


28,701
27,349
25,670
1,808,760
1,627,910
1,738,282

(1)Amounts reported in fiscal 2019 include the aggregate grant date fair value of the PRSUs and Service RSUs (including the attached Outperformance RSU modifier) granted to the named executive officer in 2019, each calculated in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. For PRSUs, the grant date fair value calculation in the table above assumes that the target level of performance is achieved. More information on methodologies made when calculating the grant date fair value of the PRSUs and Service RSUs is found in Notes 1 (Nature of Business and Financial Statement Presentation) and 12 (Stock Based Compensation) to our Consolidated Financial Statements in Part II, Item 8 of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2019. Assuming the maximum level of performance is achieved, the maximum possible value of PRSUs and Service RSUs (and assuming maximum performance achievement on Outperformance RSUs) granted to each named executive officer is as follows: $8,225,556 for Mr. Taylor; $3,016,022 for Ms. Aman; $2,878,903 for Mr. Horgan; $2,741,829 for Mr. Finnegan; and $2,262,007 for Mr. Siegel.  
(2)Amounts reported in fiscal 2019 reflect cash incentive awards earned by our named executive officers under the Annual Bonus Plan. These awards were based on pre-established, performance-based corporate financial targets (75%) and individual qualitative goals (25%), the outcome of which was uncertain at the time the targets were established, and, therefore, are reportable as “Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation” rather than as “Bonus.” Additional information regarding the Annual Bonus Plan payments is described above under “Compensation Discussion and Analysis—Compensation Elements—Annual Bonus Plan Compensation.”
(3)We have no pension benefits, nonqualified defined contribution or other nonqualified deferred compensation plans for executive officers.
(4)All Other Compensation for 2019 for each named executive officer includes the following:

BRIXMOR PROPERTY GROUPï2020 PROXY STATEMENTïPAGE 48

(1)

Amounts reported in fiscal 2017 include the aggregate grant date fair value of the RSUs granted to the NEO in 2017, each calculated in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. The grant date fair value calculation in the table above assumes that the target level of performance is achieved. The amount for Mr. Finnegan includes $6,543 for the incremental aggregate grant date fair value of 283 incremental time-vested RSUs received by Mr. Finnegan in exchange for 1,137 LTIP awards forfeited in March 2017 and $26,509 for the incremental aggregate grant date fair value of 1,662 incremental performance-based RSUs received by Mr. Finnegan in exchange for 6,670 performance-based LTIP awards forfeited in March 2017. More information on methodologies made when calculating the grant date fair value of the RSUs is found in Notes 1 (Nature of Business and Financial Statement Presentation) and 10 (Stock Based Compensation) to our Consolidated Financial Statements in Part II, Item 8 of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2017. Assuming the maximum level of performance is achieved, the maximum possible value of RSUs granted to each NEO is as follows: $4,174,969 for Mr. Taylor; $1,391,630 for Ms. Aman; $1,391,630 for Mr. Horgan; $1,287,285 for Mr. Siegel; and $739,454 for Mr. Finnegan.

(2)
Amounts reported in fiscal 2017 reflect cash incentive awards earned by our named executive officers under the Annual Bonus Plan. These awards were based on pre-established, performance-based targets, the outcome of which was uncertain at the time the targets were established, and, therefore, are reportable as “Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation” rather than as “Bonus.” Additional information regarding the annual bonus payments is described above under “Compensation Discussion and Analysis—Compensation Elements—Annual Cash Incentive Compensation.”
(3)
We have no pension benefits, nonqualified defined contribution or other nonqualified deferred compensation plans for executive officers.
32

(4)
All Other Compensation for 2017 for each named executive officer includes the following:
Name
Insurance
Costs(a)
($)
Company
Contribution to
Defined
Contribution
Plans(b)
($)
Use of
Company
Auto or
Auto Allowance
($)
Relocation
and
Housing
Expenses(c)
($)
Total
($)
James M. Taylor20,6328,100550,000578,732
Angela Aman20,6328,1007,49136,223
Mark Horgan20,6068,1004,61233,318
Steven F. Siegel17,5708,10025,670
Brian T. Finnegan12,5498,10010,80031,449
(a)
Represents employer-paid medical, dental, life, accidental death and dismemberment, and short and long-term disability insurance premiums.
(b)
Represents the employer’s 401(k) plan matching contributions.
(c)
Pursuant to the employment agreement dated April 12, 2016 between the Company and James Taylor, the Company’s chief executive officer, the Company was contingently obligated to purchase Mr. Taylor’s former residence for an amount equal to the appraised value of the residence as of a date within 120 days of the execution of the employment agreement (the “Original Appraisal”). Based upon the contingency being triggered in May 2017, the Company purchased the residence on July 5, 2017 for said appraised value of  $4.4 million. The Company intends to sell the residence. Based on an August 2017 appraisal, the value of the residence was $3.85 million. The above amount represents the difference in appraised value of Mr. Taylor’s residence between the Original Appraisal and the appraisal performed in August 2017. For Ms. Aman, such amounts represented temporary housing expenses and for Mr. Horgan, such amounts represented temporary storage expenses.
Fiscal 2017 Grants of Plan-Based Awards Table
PLAN-BASED AWARDS TABLE

The following table provides supplemental information relating to grants of plan-based awards in fiscal 20172019 to help explain information provided above in our Summary Compensation Table.

NameGrant
Date
Estimated Future Payout
Under Non-Equity
Incentive Plan Awards(1)
Estimated Future Payout
Under Equity Incentive
Plan Awards
All Other
Stock
Awards:
Number of
Shares of
Stock or
Units
(#)
Grant Date
Fair Value
of
Stock and
Option
Awards(5)
Threshold
($)
Target
($)
Maximum
($)
Threshold
(#)
Target
(#)
Maximum
(#)
James M. Taylor Jr.800,0001,000,0001,600,000
3/10/17(2)91,892151,057210,2202,999,992
Angela Aman280,000375,000500,000
3/10/17(2)30,63050,35270,072999,990
Mark Horgan266,000356,250475,000
3/10/17(2)30,63050,35270,072999,990
Steven F. Siegel220,500292,500382,500
3/10/17(2)28,33346,57664,818924,999
Brian T. Finnegan168,750225,000318,750
3/10/17(2)15,31425,17635,035499,995
3/13/17(3)9971,6622,32726,509
3/13/17(4)2836,543

       Estimated Future Payout
Under Non-Equity
Incentive Plan Awards(1)
  Estimated Future Payout
Under Equity Incentive
Plan Awards
  All Other
Stock
Awards: 
   Grant Date
Fair Value
 
Name Grant Date  Award Type Threshold
($)
  Target ($)  Maximum
($)
  Threshold
(#)
  Target (#)  Maximum
(#)
  Number
of Shares
of Stock
Or Units
(#)
   of
Stock and
Option
Awards(4)
($)
 
James M. Taylor Jr.    Cash Incentive  1,068,750   1,425,000   1,900,000                
   02/26/2019(2)  PRSUs           51,487   102,975   205,950      2,312,819 
   02/26/2019(3)  Service RSUs           68,649   68,649   205,945      1,199,985 
                                       
Angela Aman    Cash Incentive  412,500   550,000   687,500                
   02/26/2019(2)  PRSUs           18,879   37,758   75,516      848,045 
   02/26/2019(3)  Service RSUs           25,171   25,171   75,511      439,989 
                                       
Mark Horgan    Cash Incentive  393,750   525,000   656,250                
   02/26/2019(2)  PRSUs           18,020   36,041   72,082      809,481 
   02/26/2019(3)  Service RSUs           24,027   24,027   72,079      419,992 
                                       
Brian T. Finnegan    Cash Incentive  280,000   375,000   500,000                
   02/26/2019(2)  PRSUs           17,162   34,325   68,650      770,940 
   02/26/2019(3)  Service RSUs           22,883   22,883   68,647      399,995 
                                       
Steven F. Siegel    Cash Incentive  220,500   292,500   382,500                
   02/26/2019(2)  PRSUs           14,159   28,318   56,636      636,022 
   02/26/2019(3)  Service RSUs           18,878   18,878   56,634      329,987 
                                       

(1)Reflects the possible payouts of cash incentive compensation under the Annual Bonus Plan. Amounts are based on individual bonus ranges as a percentage of base salary for each executive. Threshold, target and maximum amounts presented for Messrs. Taylor, Horgan and Finnegan and Ms. Aman are based on increased salaries and/or bonus ranges, which were increased effective in March 2019, as if such increases were in effect the entire year. The actual amounts paid, together with other cash incentive compensation paid to each named executive officer during 2019, are described in the “Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation” column of the “Summary Compensation Table” above and the accompanying footnote.
(2)Reflects PRSUs granted during 2019.

BRIXMOR PROPERTY GROUPï2020 PROXY STATEMENTïPAGE 49

(1)

Reflects the possible payouts of cash incentive compensation under the Annual Bonus Plan. The actual amounts paid, together with other cash incentive compensation paid to each named executive officer during 2017, are described in the “Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation” column of the “Summary Compensation Table” above and the accompanying footnote.

(2)
Reflects performance-based RSUs granted during 2017. See “Compensation Discussion and Analysis—Long-Term Equity Compensation.”
(3)
Reflects the incremental performance-based RSUs received by Mr. Finnegan in exchange for performance-based LTIP awards forfeited in March 2017.
(4)
Reflects the incremental time-vested RSUs received by Mr. Finnegan in exchange for LTIP awards forfeited in March 2017.
(5)
Represents the grant date fair value (at target level) granted during 2017 calculated in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718 and as described in footnote 1 to the “Summary Compensation Table.”
33

Narrative Disclosure to Summary Compensation Table and Grants of Plan-Based Awards Table
PLAN-BASED AWARDS TABLE

The principal terms of the employment agreements of each of our named executive officers which are relevant to understanding their 2017 compensation, are summarized below, except with respect to potential payments and other benefits upon specified terminations or a “change in control” (as defined in the employment agreements), which are summarized below under “Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control.”

Employment Agreements with ourOur Named Executive Officers

The employment agreements with each of our named executive officers contain substantially similar terms. Under the employment agreements, each executive is eligible to receive a minimum base salary, as set forth in the applicable agreement, and an annual bonus based on the achievement of specified Company financial goals and individual goals. If these goals are achieved, each executive may receive an annual incentive cash bonus equal to a percentage of his or her base salary as provided below. Each executive officer is also entitled to participate in all employee benefit plans, programs and arrangements made available to other executive officers generally.

Under the employment agreements, a “constructive termination” is deemed to occur upon specified events, including,subject, in each case, to specified notice and cure periods. Such specified events include a reduction in the executive’s annual salary or incentive compensation opportunities, where the executive’s compensation or other material employee benefit are not paid when due, upon a material reduction in the executive’s authority or responsibilities, upon specified relocation events or, in the case of Messrs. SiegelFinnegan and Finnegan,Siegel, where the Company elects not to renew the executive’s employment agreement, subject, in each case, to specified notice and cure periods.

agreement.

Each of the employment agreements also contain restrictive covenants, including an indefinite covenant on confidentiality of information, and covenants related to non-competition and non-solicitation of our employees, customers and affiliates at all times during the named executive officer’s employment, and for one or two years after specified terminations of the named executive officer’s employment (other than for cause).

Following are the material provisions of the employment agreements of our named executive officers.

BRIXMOR PROPERTY GROUPï2020 PROXY STATEMENTïPAGE 50

Taylor Employment Agreement.   

Mr. Taylor’s employment agreement provides that he is to serve as Chief Executive Officer and President. The term of

Mr. Taylor’s employment agreement is from May 20, 2016 to May 20, 2021 and may be terminated by either the Company or Mr. Taylor at any time and for any reason with proper notice. The agreement provides that the Company will pay Mr. Taylor ana minimum annual base salary of $800,000, subject to increases as may be approved by the Board or the Compensation Committee.$800,000. Mr. Taylor is also eligible to receive ana minimum annual bonus of 100% of his annual base salary if threshold performance objectives are met; 125% of his annual base salary if target performance objectives are metmet; and up to a maximum of 200% of his annual base salary for top performance. Pursuant toFor information about the employment agreement, the Company was contingently obligated to purchase Mr. Taylor’s former residence for an amount equal to the appraised value of the residence as of a date within 120 days of the execution of the employment agreement. Based upon the contingency being triggeredactual base salary paid and bonus range applicable in May 2017, the Company purchased the residence on July 5, 2017 for said appraised value of $4.4 million. The Company intends to sell the residence. Based on an August 2017 appraisal, the value of the residence was $3.85 million. For additional information concerning this employment agreement,2019, see our Form 8-K filed April 15, 2016.
“—Compensation Discussion and Analysis—Compensation Elements” and “—Summary Compensation Table” above.

Aman Employment Agreement.   

Ms. Aman’s employment agreement, as amended, provides that she is to serve as Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer. The term of Ms. Aman’s employment agreement is fromcontinues until May 20, 2016 to May 20, 20192022 and may be terminated by either the Company or Ms. Aman at any time and for any reason with proper notice. The agreement provides that the Company will pay Ms. Aman ana minimum annual base salary of $500,000, subject to increases as may be approved by the Board or the Compensation Committee.$500,000. Ms. Aman is also eligible to receive ana minimum annual bonus of 56% of her annual base salary if threshold performance objectives are met; 75% of her annual base salary if target performance objectives are metmet; and up to a maximum of 100% of her annual base salary for top performance.

For information about the actual base salary paid and bonus range applicable in 2019, see “—Compensation Discussion and Analysis—Compensation Elements” and “—Summary Compensation Table” above.

Horgan Employment Agreement.   Agreement

Mr. Horgan’s employment agreement, as amended, provides that he is to serve as Executive Vice President, Chief Investment Officer. The term of Mr. Horgan’s employment agreement is fromcontinues until May 20, 2016 to May 20, 20192022 and may be terminated by the Company or Mr. Horgan at any time and for any reason with proper notice. The agreement provides that the Company will pay Mr. Horgan ana minimum annual base salary of $475,000, subject to such periodic adjustments as may be approved by the Board or the Compensation Committee.$475,000. Mr. Horgan is

34

also eligible to receive ana minimum annual bonus of 56% of his annual base salary if threshold performance objectives are met,met; 75% of his annual base salary if target performance objectives are metmet; and up to a maximum of 100% of his annual base salary for top performance.
Siegel Employment Agreement.   Mr. Siegel’s employment agreement provides that he is to serve as Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary and is eligible to receive an annual For information about the actual base salary of $421,199, subject to such periodic adjustments as may be approved by the Board or the paid and bonus range applicable in 2019, see “—Compensation Committee. Mr. Siegel is also eligible to receive an annual bonus of 49% of his annual base salary if threshold performance objectives are met, 65% of his annual base salary if target performance objectives are metDiscussion and up to a maximum of 85% of his annual base salary for top performance. Mr. Siegel’s employment agreement extends automatically for
one-year periods unless either the Company or Mr. Siegel elects not to extend the term.
Analysis—Compensation Elements” and “—Summary Compensation Table” above.

Finnegan Employment Agreement.Agreement

Mr. Finnegan’s employment agreement provides that he is to serve as Executive Vice President, Leasing and is eligible to receive ana minimum annual base salary of $300,000, subject to such periodic adjustments as may be approved by the Board or the Compensation Committee.$275,000. Mr. Finnegan is also eligible to receive ana minimum annual bonus of 45% of his annual base salary if threshold performance objectives are met,met; 60% of his annual base salary if target performance objectives are metmet; and up to a maximum of 85% of his annual base salary for top performance. Mr. Finnegan’s employment agreement extends automatically for one-year periods unless either the Company or Mr. Finnegan elects not to extend the term.

For information about the actual base salary paid and bonus range applicable in 2019, see “—Compensation Discussion and Analysis—Compensation Elements” and “—Summary Compensation Table” above.

BRIXMOR PROPERTY GROUPï2020 PROXY STATEMENTïPAGE 51

Outstanding Equity Awards at 2017 Fiscal Year End

Siegel Employment Agreement

Mr. Siegel’s employment agreement, as amended, provides that he is to serve as Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary and is eligible to receive a minimum annual base salary of $421,199. Mr. Siegel is also eligible to receive a minimum annual bonus of 49% of his annual base salary if threshold performance objectives are met; 65% of his annual base salary if target performance objectives are met; and up to a maximum of 85% of his annual base salary for top performance. Mr. Siegel’s employment agreement extends automatically for one-year periods unless either the Company or Mr. Siegel elects not to extend the term. For information about the actual base salary paid and bonus range applicable in 2019, see “—Compensation Discussion and Analysis—Compensation Elements” and “—Summary Compensation Table” above.

OUTSTANDING EQUITY AWARDS AT 2019 FISCAL YEAR END

The following table provides information regarding outstanding awards made to our named executive officers as of our most recent fiscal year end.

Stock Awards
NameNumber of
Shares or Units
of Stock That
Have Not Vested
(#)
Market Value of
Shares or Units
of Stock That
Have Not Vested
($)(6)
Equity Incentive
Plan Awards:
Number of
Unearned
Shares, Units or
Other Rights
That Have Not
Vested
(#)
Equity Incentive
Plan Awards:
Market or Payout
Value of Unearned
Shares, Units or
Other Rights That
Have Not Vested
($)(6)
James M. Taylor135,727(1)2,532,66638,705(7)722,235
7,818(2)145,884151,057(8)2,818,724
Angela Aman47,114(3)879,14716,228(7)302,814
5,578(2)104,08550,352(8)939,568
Mark Horgan38,329(3)715,21915,778(7)294,417
5,424(2)101,21250,352(8)939,568
Steven F. Siegel11,397(2)212,66833,154(7)618,653
11,868(4)221,45746,576(8)869,108
4,178(5)77,961
Brian T. Finnegan4,313(2)80,48112,544(7)234,071
1,582(4)29,52025,176(8)469,784
1,976(5)36,872
(1)
Reflects time-vesting RSUs granted pursuant to such officer’s employment agreement, 50% of which vested on January 1, 2018 and 50% of which will vest on January 1, 2019.
(2)
Reflects RSUs that have been earned based on performance for the period from January 1, 2016 to December 31, 2016, 50% of which vested on January 1, 2018 and 50% of which will vest on January 1, 2019.
(3)
Reflects time-vesting RSUs granted pursuant to such officers’ employment agreements. The awards will vest in four equal annual installments beginning May 20, 2018.
(4)
Reflects RSUs that have been earned based on performance for the period from October 29, 2013 to December 31, 2016, 50% of which vested on January 1, 2018 and 50% of which will vest on January 1, 2019.
35

(5)
Reflects RSUs that have been earned based on performance for the period from January 1, 2015 to December 31, 2015 and vested on January 1, 2018.
(6)
Amounts reported are based on the closing market price of our common stock as of December 31, 2017.
(7)
Reflects performance-based RSUs at target level granted on March 1, 2016 (for Messrs. Siegel and Finnegan) or on May 20, 2016 (for Messrs. Taylor and Horgan and Ms. Aman) with respect to the performance period beginning on January 1, 2016 and ending on December 31, 2018 (the “three-year performance period”). RSUs granted with respect to the three-year performance period will vest, if at all, based on the achievement of the performance criteria with respect to such performance period, and then, for units earned, 50% will vest on the date the Compensation Committee confirms achievement of the performance metrics with respect to the three-year performance period after December 31, 2018, 25% will vest on January 1, 2020, and 25% will vest on January 1, 2021, in each case subject to continued employment.
The table below sets forth the number of RSUs subject to the three-year performance period. As results to date indicate no achievement for the three-year performance period, the amounts reflected below are threshold amounts (with no RSUs being reflected for the company-wide goal).

  Name Number of Shares
or Units of Stock
That Have Not
Vested (#)
  Market Value of
Shares or Units of
Stock That Have
Not Vested ($)(1)
  Equity Incentive
Plan Awards:
Number of
Unearned Shares,
Units or Other
Rights That Have
Not Vested (#)
  Equity Incentive
Plan Awards:
Market or Payout
Value of Unearned
Shares, Units or
Other Rights That
Have Not Vested
($)(1)
 
James M. Taylor Jr.  14,162(2)   306,041   100,704(6)   2,176,213 
   50,568(3)   1,092,774   227,560(7)   4,917,572 
   68,649(4)   1,483,505   75,852(8)   1,639,161 
           205,950(9)   4,450,580 
           68,648(10)   1,483,483 
Angela Aman  4,721(2)   102,021   33,568(6)   725,404 
   16,856(3)   364,258   75,854(7)   1,639,205 
   25,171(4)   543,945   25,284(8)   546,387 
   23,556(5)   509,045   75,516(9)   1,631,900 
           25,170(10)   543,924 
Mark Horgan  4,721(2)   102,021   33,568(6)   725,404 
   16,856(3)   364,258   75,854(7)   1,639,205 
   24,027(4)   519,223   25,284(8)   546,387 
   19,164(5)   414,134   72,082(9)   1,557,692 
           24,026(10)   519,202 
Brian T. Finnegan  2,361(2)   51,021   16,784(6)   362,702 
   11,798(3)   254,955   53,098(7)   1,147,448 
   22,883(4)   494,501   17,698(8)   382,453 
           68,650(9)   1,483,527 
           22,882(10)   494,480 
Steven F. Siegel  4,367(2)   94,371   31,050(6)   670,990 
   13,906(3)   300,509   62,580(7)   1,352,353 
   18,878(4)   407,954   20,858(8)   450,741 
           56,636(9)   1,223,903 
           18,878(10)   407,954 

(1)Performance Period:Three-Year
Performance
Period
Amounts reported are based on the closing market price of our common stock as of December 31, 2019.
(2)Reflects RSUs that have been earned based on performance for the period from January 1, 2017 to December 31, 2017, which vested on January 1, 2020.

BRIXMOR PROPERTY GROUPï2020 PROXY STATEMENTïPAGE 52

(3)BasedReflects Service RSUs granted in 2018, 50% of which vested on Plan
Achievement Level:
ThresholdJanuary 1, 2020 and 50% of which will vest on January 1, 2021.
James M. Taylor(4)15,481Reflects Service RSUs granted in 2019, one third of which vested on January 1, 2020, with the remaining two-thirds vesting in two equal annual installments beginning on January 1, 2021.
Angela Aman(5)6,490Reflects time-vesting RSUs granted pursuant to such officers’ employment agreements. These awards will vest in two equal annual installments beginning on May 20, 2020.
Mark Horgan(6)6,310As results to date indicate performance at approximately the target level, reflects performance-based RSUs at the target level granted on March 10, 2017 with respect to the performance period beginning on January 1, 2017 and ending on December 31, 2019. These RSUs will vest based on the achievement of the performance criteria with respect to such performance period, and then, for units earned, 50% will vest on February 25, 2020, 25% will vest on January 1, 2021, and 25% will vest on January 1, 2022.
Steven F. Siegel(7)13,261As results to date indicate performance at the maximum performance level, reflects PRSUs at the maximum performance level granted on February 28, 2018 with respect to the performance period beginning on January 1, 2018 and ending on December 31, 2020. As more fully described above under “Compensation Discussion and Analysis—Long-Term Equity Compensation,” PRSUs will vest, if at all, based on the achievement of the performance criteria with respect to such performance period, and then, for units earned, 50% will vest on the date the Compensation Committee confirms achievement of the performance metrics with respect to the three-year performance period after December 31, 2020, 25% will vest on January 1, 2022, and 25% will vest on January 1, 2023, in each case subject to continued employment.
Brian T. Finnegan(8)As results to date indicate performance between threshold and target, reflects Outperformance RSUs at target level eligible to be granted in 2021 with respect to the performance period beginning on January 1, 2019 and ending on December 31, 2020. As more fully described above under “Compensation Discussion and Analysis—Long-Term Equity Compensation”, Outperformance RSUs may be granted based on achievement of FFO per share and Same Property NOI growth during the performance period. To the extent granted, 50% of Outperformance RSUs will vest on the date the Compensation Committee confirms achievement of the performance metrics with respect to the two-year performance period after December 31, 2020, 25% will vest on January 1, 2022, and 25% will vest on January 1, 2023, in each case subject to continued employment.
(9)As results to date indicate performance at the maximum level, reflects PRSUs at maximum level granted on February 26, 2019 with respect to the performance period beginning on January 1, 2019 and ending on December 31, 2021. As more fully described above under “Compensation Discussion and Analysis—Long-Term Equity Compensation,” PRSUs will vest, if at all, based on the achievement of the performance criteria with respect to such performance period, and then, for units earned, 50% will vest on the date the Compensation Committee confirms achievement of the performance metrics with respect to the three-year performance period after December 31, 2021, 25% will vest on January 1, 2023, and 25% will vest on January 1, 2024, in each case subject to continued employment.
(10)5,017As results to date indicate performance between threshold and target, reflects Outperformance RSUs at target level eligible to be granted in 2022 with respect to the performance period beginning on January 1, 2019 and ending on December 31, 2021. As more fully described above under “Compensation Discussion and Analysis—Long-Term Equity Compensation”, Outperformance RSUs may be granted based on achievement of FFO per share and Same Property NOI growth during the performance period. To the extent granted, 50% of Outperformance RSUs will vest on the date the Compensation Committee confirms achievement of the performance metrics with respect to the two-year performance period after December 31, 2021, 25% will vest on January 1, 2023, and 25% will vest on January 1, 2024, in each case subject to continued employment.
(8)
Reflects performance-based RSUs at target level granted on March 10, 2017 with respect to the performance period beginning on January 1, 2017 and ending on December 31, 2017 (the “one-year performance period”) and beginning on January 1, 2017 and ending on December 31,

OPTION EXERCISES AND STOCK VESTED IN FISCAL 2019 (the “three-year performance period”). As more fully described above under “Compensation Discussion and Analysis—Long-Term Equity Compensation”, RSUs granted with respect to the one-year performance period will vest, if at all, based on the achievement of the performance criteria with respect to such performance period, and then, for units earned, 50% vested as of February 27, 2018, the date the Compensation Committee confirmed achievement of the performance metrics with respect to the one-year performance period, 25% will vest on January 1, 2019 and 25% will vest on January 1, 2020. RSUs granted with respect to the three-year performance period will vest, if at all, based on the achievement of the performance criteria with respect to such performance period, and then, for units earned, 50% will vest on the date the Compensation Committee confirms achievement of the performance metrics with respect to the three-year performance period after December 31, 2019, 25% will vest on January 1, 2021, and 25% will vest on January 1, 2022.

The table below sets forth the number of RSUs subject to each performance period. As results of the one-year performance period were overall near target level, the amounts below reflect target amounts. As results to date indicate below threshold level for the three-year performance period, the amounts below reflect threshold amounts (with RSUs being reflected at target level for the company-wide goal).
Performance Period:One-Year
Performance
Period
Three-Year
Performance
Period
Based on Plan
Achievement Level:
TargetThreshold
James M. Taylor50,35360,422
Angela Aman16,78420,140
Mark Horgan16,78420,140
Steven F. Siegel15,52618,630
Brian T. Finnegan8,39210,070
36

Option Exercises and Stock Vested in Fiscal 2017

The following table provides information regarding the amounts received by our named executive officers upon the vesting of stock or similar instruments during our most recent fiscal year. We do not have any outstanding options.

  Name  Number of Shares Acquired
on Vesting (#)(1)
  

Value Received on
Vesting ($)(1,2)

 
James M. Taylor Jr.  111,218   1,633,792 
Angela Aman  27,715   445,647 
Mark T. Horgan  25,442   405,075 
Brian T. Finnegan  11,205   164,600 
Steven F. Siegel  22,950   337,135 

(1)Reflects the vesting of (i) time-vesting RSUs granted pursuant to the 2013 Omnibus Incentive Plan pursuant to the employment agreements of Mr. Taylor (“RSU 1”), (ii) performance and time-vesting RSUs granted pursuant to the 2013Omnibus Incentive Plan in respect of (A) the performance period beginning on January 1, 2016 and ending on December 31, 2016 (“RSU 2”) and (B) the performance period beginning on January 1, 2017 and ending on December 31, 2017 (“RSU 3”), (iii) time-vesting Service RSUs granted pursuant to the 2013 Omnibus Incentive Plan in 2018 (“RSU 4”), (iv) time-vesting RSUs granted pursuant to the 2013 Omnibus Incentive Plan pursuant to the employment agreements of Ms. Aman and Mr. Horgan (“RSU 5”) and (v) performance and time-vesting RSUs granted pursuant to the 2013 Omnibus Incentive Plan in respect of the performance period beginning on October 29, 2013 and ending on December 31, 2016 (“RSU 6”), in each case, as further described below. The terms of the RSUs are described above under “—Compensation Discussion and Analysis—Long-Term Equity Compensation—2016 Restricted Stock Unit (“RSU”) Awards
NameNumber of Shares Acquired
on Vesting (#)
Value Received on
Vesting ($)(1)(2) Performance Determination.”
James M. Taylor75,682(1)1,839,710
Angela Aman17,357(1)349,868
Mark Horgan15,006(1)305,296
Steven F. Siegel33,733(1)798,635
Brian T. Finnegan8,355(1)197,664

BRIXMOR PROPERTY GROUPï2020 PROXY STATEMENTïPAGE 53

(1)

Reflects the vesting of  (i) time-vesting RSUs granted pursuant to the 2013 Omnibus Incentive Plan pursuant to the employment agreement of Mr. Taylor (“RSU 1”), (ii) time-vesting RSUs granted pursuant to the 2013 Omnibus Incentive Plan pursuant to the employment agreements of Ms. Aman and Mr. Horgan (“RSU 2”) and (iii) performance and time-vesting RSUs or LTIP Units granted pursuant to the 2013 Omnibus Incentive Plan in respect of  (A) the performance period beginning on October 29, 2013 and ending on December 31, 2016 (“RSU 3”), (B) the performance period beginning on January 1, 2014 and ending on December 31, 2015 (“RSU 4”), (C) the performance period beginning on January 1, 2015 and ending on December 31, 2015 (“RSU 5”) and (D) the performance period beginning on January 1, 2016 and ending on December 31, 2016 (“RSU 6”), in each case, as further described below. The terms of the RSUs and LTIP Units are described above under “Narrative Disclosure to Summary Compensation Table and Grants of Plan-Based Awards Table—Terms of the RSUs and LTIP Units.”

AwardNumber of Vested
Shares of Brixmor
Property Group Inc.
Common Stock
(#)
Vesting
Date
Value Received
on Vesting
($)
Mr. TaylorRSU 167,8641/1/171,657,238
RSU 67,8182/28/17182,472
Ms. AmanRSU 211,7795/20/17219,678
RSU 65,5782/28/17130,190
Mr. HorganRSU 29,5835/20/17178,723
RSU 65,4232/28/17126,573
Mr. SiegelRSU 311,8682/28/17276,999
RSU 46,2931/1/17153,675
RSU 54,1761/1/17101,978
RSU 611,3962/28/17265,983
Mr. FinneganRSU 31,5822/28/1736,924
RSU 48381/1/1720,464
RSU 51,6231/1/1739,634
RSU 64,3122/28/17100,642

  Name  Award Number of Vested
Shares of Brixmor
Property Group Inc.
Common Stock (#)
  Vesting Date Value
Received on
Vesting ($)
 
James M. Taylor Jr. RSU 1  67,863  1/1/2019  996,907 
  RSU 2  3,910  1/1/2019  57,438 
  RSU 3  14,160  1/1/2019  208,010 
  RSU 4  25,285  1/1/2019  371,437 
Angela Aman RSU 2  2,790  1/1/2019  40,985 
  RSU 3  4,719  1/1/2019  69,322 
  RSU 4  8,428  1/1/2019  123,807 
  RSU 5  11,778  5/20/2019  211,533 
Mark Horgan RSU 2  2,713  1/1/2019  39,854 
  RSU 3  4,719  1/1/2019  69,322 
  RSU 4  8,428  1/1/2019  123,807 
  RSU 5  9,582  5/20/2019  172,092 
Brian T. Finnegan RSU 2  2,157  1/1/2019  31,686 
  RSU 3  2,357  1/1/2019  34,624 
  RSU 4  5,900  1/1/2019  86,671 
  RSU 6  791  1/1/2019  11,619 
Steven F. Siegel RSU 2  5,699  1/1/2019  83,718 
  RSU 3  4,364  1/1/2019  64,107 
  RSU 4  6,953  1/1/2019  102,140 
  RSU 6  5,934  1/1/2019  87,170 

(2)

Value received on vesting is based on the closing price of our common stock on the applicable vesting date.
Pension Benefits for Fiscal 2017

PENSION BENEFITS FOR FISCAL 2019

We have no pension benefits for the executive officers.

Nonqualified Deferred Compensation for Fiscal 2017

NONQUALIFIED DEFERRED COMPENSATION FOR FISCAL 2019

We have no nonqualified defined contribution or other nonqualified compensation plans for executive officers.

BRIXMOR PROPERTY GROUPï2020 PROXY STATEMENTïPAGE 54

Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control

POTENTIAL PAYMENTS UPON TERMINATION OR CHANGE IN CONTROL

The following table describes the potential payments and benefits that would have been payable to our current named executive officers under existing plans and contractual arrangements assuming (1) a termination of employment and/or (2) a change of control (“CIC”) occurred, in each case, on December 29, 2017,31, 2019, the last business day of the 2019 fiscal

37

2017. year. The amounts shown in the table do not include payments and benefits to the extent they are provided generally to all salaried employees upon termination of employment and do not discriminate in scope, terms or operation in favor of the named executive officers. These include distributions of plan balances under our 401(k) savings plan and similar items. Except as noted in footnote 4, for purposes of the table below, a “Qualifying Termination” refers to a
termination by BPG Subsidiary without “cause” (as defined in the named executive officers’ employment agreements) or by a named executive officer as a result of a “constructive termination” (as defined under “Narrative Disclosure to Summary Compensation Table and Grants of Plan-Based Awards Table—Employment Agreements with Our Named Executive Officers”).

Name Cash
Incentive
($)(1)
   Continuation
of Health
Benefits ($)(2)
   Value of
Accelerated Equity
($)(3)
  Total ($) 
James M. Taylor Jr.                
Qualifying Termination, no CIC  6,321,175   38,388   10,999,036   17,358,599 
Qualifying Termination, CIC  6,321,175   38,388   17,076,697   23,436,260 
CIC without Termination        17,076,697   17,076,697 
Death or Disability Termination  1,425,000      10,999,036   12,424,036 
Angela Aman                
Qualifying Termination, no CIC  2,492,953   24,722   4,285,803   6,803,478 
Qualifying Termination, CIC  2,492,953   24,722   6,433,708   8,951,383 
CIC without Termination        6,433,708   6,433,708 
Death or Disability Termination  550,000      4,285,803   4,835,803 
Mark Horgan                
Qualifying Termination, no CIC  2,390,649   38,388   4,135,657   6,564,694 
Qualifying Termination, CIC  2,390,649   38,388   6,222,556   8,651,593 
CIC without Termination        6,222,556   6,222,556 
Death or Disability Termination  525,000      4,135,657   4,660,657 
Brian T. Finnegan                
Qualifying Termination, no CIC  1,996,805   25,592   2,728,587   4,750,984 
Qualifying Termination, CIC  1,996,805   25,592   4,512,665   6,535,062 
CIC without Termination        4,512,665   4,512,665 
Death or Disability Termination  375,000      2,728,587   3,103,587 
Steven F. Siegel                
Qualifying Termination, no CIC  1,855,677   20,361   3,109,204   4,985,242 
Qualifying Termination, CIC  1,855,677   20,361   4,780,586   6,656,624 
CIC without Termination        4,780,586   4,780,586 
Death or Disability Termination  292,500      3,109,204   3,401,704 

(1)Under their employment agreements, each of Messrs. Taylor, Horgan, Finnegan and Siegel and Ms. Aman is entitled to receive a cash severance amount that consists of an annual bonus in an amount equal to his or her target bonus, prorated based on the number of days during the fiscal year that such executive was employed prior to the termination date, plus in the case of a Qualifying Termination, an amount equal to the sum of  (x) 250% of base salary for Mr. Taylor or 200% of base salary for the other named executive officers, and (y) the sum of such executive’sannual bonuses payable (if any) in respect of the two fiscal years immediately prior to the termination date. The named executive officers receive no cash severance in the case of a change in control without termination Calculated based on increased base salaries and/or target bonus levels for Messrs. Taylor, Horgan and Finnegan and Ms. Aman, which increases were effective in March 2019, as if such increases were in effect for the entire year.

BRIXMOR PROPERTY GROUPï2020 PROXY STATEMENTïPAGE 55

Name
Cash
Severance(1)
($)
Continuation
of Health
Benefits(2)
($)
Gross-Up
Payments(3)
($)
Value of
Accelerated
Equity(4)
($)
Total
($)
James M. Taylor Jr.
Qualifying Termination, no CIC5,000,00035,1223,955,9398,990,515
Qualifying Termination, CIC5,000,00035,1224,254,6679,289,789
CIC without Termination4,254,6674,254,667
Death or Disability Termination1,000,0003,955,9394,955,939
Angela Aman
Qualifying Termination, no CIC2,125,00035,1221,417,3023,577,424
Qualifying Termination, CIC2,125,00035,1221,521,0143,681,136
CIC without Termination1,521,0141,521,014
Death or Disability Termination375,0001,417,3021,792,302
Mark Horgan
Qualifying Termination, no CIC2,018,75035,1221,249,3803,268,130
Qualifying Termination, CIC2,018,75035,1221,352,5333,371,283
CIC without Termination1,352,5331,352,533
Death or Disability Termination356,2501,249,3801,605,630
Steven F. Siegel
Qualifying Termination, no CIC1,901,36326,3311,056,1002,983,794
Qualifying Termination, CIC1,901,36326,3311,174,6103,102,304
CIC without Termination1,174,6101,174,610
Death or Disability Termination292,5001,056,1001,348,600
Brian T. Finnegan
Qualifying Termination, no CIC1,411,50023,415418,9921,853,907
Qualifying Termination, CIC1,411,50023,415476,3711,911,286
CIC without Termination476,371476,371
Death or Disability Termination225,000418,992643,992
(1)
Under their employment agreements, each of Messrs. Taylor, Horgan, Siegel and Finnegan and Ms. Aman is entitled to receive a cash severance amount that consists of an annual bonus in an amount equal to his or her target bonus, prorated based on the number of days during the fiscal year that such executive was employed prior to the termination date, plus in the case of a Qualifying Termination, an amount equal to the sum of   (x) 250% of base salary for Mr. Taylor or 200% of base salary for the other named executive officers, and (y) the sum of such executive’s annual bonuses payable (if any) in respect of the two fiscal years immediately prior to the termination date (or, in the case of Messrs. Taylor and Horgan and Ms. Aman, two times the 2017 annual target bonus provided in the executive’s respective employment agreement).
(2)
Reflects the cost of providing the executive officer with a continuation of medical, dental and vision insurance under COBRA for a period of twelve months (for Messrs. Siegel and Finnegan) or eighteen months (for Messrs. Taylor and Horgan and Ms. Aman) following the date of termination.
(3)
The Company’s named executive officers’ payments upon termination that become subject to tax under Code Section 4999 entitle them to a modified gross-up. In order for the executives to receive any gross-up
38

on such payments, the payments must exceed the limit established under the Code for determining whether any tax is due by 120%. All of the named executive officers’ payments were below this limit so would not have triggered a tax under Code Section 4999.
(4)

(2)Reflects the cost of providing the executive officer with a continuation of medical, dental and vision insurance under COBRA for a period of twelve months (for Messrs. Finnegan and Siegel) or eighteen months (for Messrs. Taylor and Horgan and Ms. Aman) following the date of termination.
(3)In addition to the amounts reported in the table above, the named executive officer would also, with respect to any RSUs, be entitled to receive cash in the amount of any dividend equivalents payable through December 31, 2019 (which amounts are not included herein).

If a named executive officer were terminated as a result of a Qualifying Termination or a Change in Control (as that term is defined in the Company’s 2013 Omnibus Incentive Plan), such individual would receive the remaining 50% of the tranche 3 RSU award granted in 2014, 50% of which was scheduled to vest on January 1, 2018 and 50% of which was scheduled to vest on January 1, 2019.

In addition to the amounts reported in the table above, the named executive officer would also, with respect to any RSUs, be entitled to receive cash in the amount of any dividend equivalents payable through December 31, 2017 (which amounts are not included herein).
In addition, if a named executive officer were terminated as a result of a Qualifying Termination or a Change in Control, such individual would receive a portion of the RSU award, as applicable, granted in 2015, with the number determined as follows:

the remaining 25% of the one-year measurement component of the award, which was scheduled to vest on January 1, 2018; and

with respect to the three-year measurement component of the award, none of such component of the award based on actual performance below threshold through the termination date.

provided, in each case, that any performance criteria based on achievement of company-wide performance objectives or satisfaction of individual performance criteria will be deemed to be achieved or satisfied at target level and, in the case of a Qualifying Termination (but not in the case of a Change in Control), prorated with respect to the three-year measurement period through December 31, 2017.
In addition to the amounts reported in the table above, the named executive officer would also, with respect to any RSUs, be entitled to receive cash in the amount of any dividend equivalents payable through December 31, 2017 (which amounts are not included herein).
In addition, if a named executive officer were terminated as a result of a Qualifying Termination or a Change in Control, such individual would receive a portion of the RSU awards granted in 2016, with the number determined as follows:

the remaining 50% of the one-year measurement component of the award, 50% of which was scheduled to vest on January 1, 2018 and 50% of which was scheduled to vest on January 1, 2019; and

with respect to the three-year measurement component of the award, none of such component of the award, based on actual performance below threshold through December 31, 2017.

provided, in each case, that any performance criteria based on achievement of company-wide performance objectives or satisfaction of individual performance criteria will be deemed to be achieved or satisfied at target level and, in the case of a Qualifying Termination (but not in the case of a Change in Control), prorated with respect to the three-year measurement period through December 31, 2017.
In addition to the amounts reported in the table above, the named executive officer would also, with respect to any RSUs, be entitled to receive cash in the amount of any dividend equivalents payable through December 31, 2017 (which amounts are not included herein).
39

In addition, if a named executive officer were terminated as a result of a Qualifying Termination or a Change in Control, such individual would receive a portion of the RSU awards granted in 2017, with the number determined as follows:

with respect to

a.the remaining 25% of the one-year measurement component of the award, the entirety of such component earned, which was determined to be 133% of target with respect to the FFO metric and target with respect to the SP NOI metric; and

with respect to the three-year measurement component of the award, none of such component of the award, which was scheduled to vest on January 1, 2020; and
b.with respect to the three-year measurement component of the award, a portion of such award, based on actual performance below threshold through December 31, 2019.

In addition, if a named executive officer were terminated as a result of a Qualifying Termination or a Change in Control, such individual would receive all of the Service RSUs and a portion of the PRSUs granted in 2018 and 2019. The number of PRSUs received by such named executive officer would be determined based on actual performance below threshold through December 31, 2017.


provided, in each case, that any performance criteria based on achievement of company-wide performance objectives or satisfaction of individual performance criteria will be deemed to be achieved or satisfied at target levelthe termination date, and, in the case of a Qualifying Termination (but not in the case of a Change in Control), prorated for the performance period through December 31, 2019. The named executive officer would also be eligible to be granted a portion of the Outperformance RSUs with respect to the three-year measurement2018 and 2019 Service RSU awards based on actual performance through the termination date and, in the case of a Qualifying Termination (but not in the case of a Change in Control), prorated for the performance period through December 31, 2017.
2019. In addition to the amounts reported in the table above, the named executive officer would also with respect to any RSUs, be entitled to receive cash in the amount of any dividend equivalents payable through December 31, 20172019 on any PRSUs or Outperformance RSUs (which amounts are not included herein).

In addition, if Messrs. Taylor, Ms. Aman or Mr. Horgan were terminated as a result of a Qualifying Termination, such individual would be entitled to receive 135,726, 47,113 or 38,32823,556 and 19,164 time-vesting RSU awards, respectively, granted pursuant to such officer’s employment agreement.

For purposes of the foregoing, “Qualifying Termination” means a termination of the individual’s employment (w) by the Company without “Cause” (as that term is defined in the Company’s 2013 Omnibus Incentive Plan, except that termination of the individual’s employment by the Company for poor performance (as determined by a majority of the management committee) shall constitute a termination by the Company for “Cause”) or while the individual has a Disability (as defined in the Company’s 2013 Omnibus Incentive Plan), (x) if the individual’s written employment agreement with the Company (or any affiliate) includes a definition of  “good reason” or “constructive termination,” by the individual for “good reason” or “constructive termination” (as defined in such written employment agreement), (y) which is a retirement (except in the case of Service RSUs and Outperformance RSUs), or (z) resulting from the individual’s death.

Compensation of Directors

COMPENSATION OF DIRECTORS

In 2017,2019, our directors who were also our employees received no compensation for their services as directors. Messrs. Berman, Deering, Dickson, Hurwitz, Rahm and Schreiber and Mses. Crosland and Sulzberger, who were compensated for their services as directors in 2017,2019, received annual fees as follows:

·$60,000 in cash, paid quarterly in arrears;

·5,000 shares of restricted stock, which vest on the anniversary of the grant date;

·$17,500 in cash in fees for service on the audit committee (or $22,500 in cash for serving as chairperson of the audit committee);

·$12,500 in cash in fees for service on the nominating and corporate governance committee; and

·$12,500 in cash in fees for service on the compensation committee.

BRIXMOR PROPERTY GROUPï2020 PROXY STATEMENTïPAGE 56


$60,000 in cash, paid quarterly in arrears;

5,000 shares of restricted stock, which vest on the anniversary of the grant date;

$17,500 in cash in fees for service on the audit committee (or $22,500 in cash for serving as chairperson of the audit committee);

$12,500 in cash in fees for service on the nominating and corporate governance committee; and

$12,500 in cash in fees for service on the compensation committee.
40

The table below sets forth information regarding director compensation, except for Mr. Taylor, which is detailed in the “Summary Compensation Table,” for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017.

NameFees
Earned
or Paid
in Cash
($)
Equity
Awards(a)
($)
Option
Awards(a)
($)
Non-Equity
Incentive Plan
Compensation
($)
Change in
Pension Value
and
Nonqualified
Deferred
Compensation
Earnings
($)
All Other
Compensation
($)
Total
($)
John G. Schreiber88,016115,600(b)203,616
Michael Berman82,50090,750(c)173,250
Sheryl M. Crosland66,94389,850(d)156,793
Anthony W. Deering78,99578,995
Thomas W. Dickson72,500107,050(e)179,550
Daniel B. Hurwitz72,50093,700(f)166,200
William D. Rahm85,000107,050(e)192,050
Gabrielle Sulzberger90,00093,700(f)183,700
(a)
Equity Awards represent the grant date fair value for the shares of restricted stock granted during 2017 calculated in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718.
(b)
Represents 5,000 shares of restricted stock, valued at a grant date fair value of  $23.12 per share.
(c)
Represents 5,000 shares of restricted stock, valued at a grant date fair value of  $18.15 per share.
(d)
Represents 5,000 shares of restricted stock, valued at a grant date fair value of  $17.97 per share.
(e)
Represents 5,000 shares of restricted stock, valued at a grant date fair value of  $21.41 per share.
(f)
Represents 5,000 shares of restricted stock, valued at a grant date fair value of  $18.74 per share.
Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation
2019.

Name  Fees
Earned or
Paid in
Cash ($)
  Equity
Awards
($)(a)
 Option
Awards
($)(a)
   Non-Equity
Incentive Plan
Compensation
($)
   Change in
Pension Value
and
Nonqualified
Deferred
Compensation
Earnings ($)
  All Other
Compensation
($)
   Total ($) 
John G. Schreiber  85,000   86,100(b)              171,100 
Michael Berman  82,500   107,000(c)              189,500 
Julie Bowerman  61,222   87,400(d)              148,622 
Sheryl M. Crosland  77,500   107,000(c)              184,500 
Thomas W. Dickson  72,500   89,150(e)              161,650 
Daniel B. Hurwitz  72,500   88,900(f)              161,400 
William D. Rahm  85,000   92,200(g)              177,200 
Gabrielle Sulzberger  90,000   88,900(f)              178,900 

(a)Equity Awards represent the grant date fair value for the shares of restricted stock granted during 2019 calculated in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718.
(b)Represents 5,000 shares of restricted stock granted on March 4, 2019, valued at a grant date fair value of $17.22 per share.
(c)Represents 5,000 shares of restricted stock granted on December 2, 2019, valued at a grant date fair value of $21.40 per share.
(d)Represents 5,000 shares of restricted stock granted on February 26, 2019, valued at a grant date fair value of $17.48 per share.
(e)Represents 5,000 shares of restricted stock granted on May 1, 2019, valued at a grant date fair value of $17.83 per share.
(f)Represents 5,000 shares of restricted stock granted on June 5, 2019, valued at a grant date fair value of $17.78 per share.
(g)Represents 5,000 shares of restricted stock granted on April 2, 2019, valued at a grant date fair value of $18.44 per share.

COMPENSATION COMMITTEE INTERLOCKS AND INSIDER PARTICIPATION

The current members of the Compensation Committee are Messrs. Dickson, Hurwitz, Rahm and Schreiber. None of these directors was, during the fiscal year, an officer or employee of the Company and none was formerly an officer of the Company. The boardBoard of directorsDirectors determined that Mr. Hurwitz’s former service as interim chief executive officerChief Executive Officer of the Company in 2016 would not affect Mr. Hurwitz’s ability to be independent from management in

connection with the duties of a Compensation Committee member. None of the other members of the Compensation Committee were formerly an officer of the Company. No executive officer of the Company served as a member of the Compensation Committee (or other board committeeBoard Committee performing equivalent functions or, in the absence of any such committee,Committee, the entire boardBoard of directors)Directors) or as a director of another entity, one of whose executive officers served on the Compensation Committee or as a directorDirector of the Company.

BRIXMOR PROPERTY GROUPï2020 PROXY STATEMENTïPAGE 57

41

pay ratiO

>PAY RATIO

Presented below is the ratio of annual total compensation of our CEO to the annual total compensation of our median employee (excluding our CEO). The ratio presented below is a reasonable estimate calculated in a manner consistent with Item 402(u) of Regulation S-K under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

In identifying our median employee in 2019, we calculated the annual cash compensation of each employee for the twelve month period that ended on December 31, 2017.2019. Cash compensation for these purposes included base salary, bonus and comparable cash elements and was calculated using internal payroll records.

We selected the median employee based on the 463474 full-time, 1 part-time and 2 temporary employees who were employed as of December 31, 2017.2019. We have no non-U.S. employees.
The 2017average tenure of our employees as of such date was 5.76 years.

The 2019 annual total compensation as determined under Item 402 of Regulation S-K for our CEO was $5,679,474.$6,220,427. The 20172019 annual total compensation as determined under Item 402 of Regulation S-K for our median employee was $100,004.$106,908. The ratio of our CEO’s annual total compensation to our median employee’s total compensation for fiscal year 20172019 is 56.7958.18 to 1.

BRIXMOR PROPERTY GROUPï2020 PROXY STATEMENTïPAGE 58

42

Ownership of Securities

>OWNERSHIP OF SECURITIES

The following table and accompanying footnotes set forth information regarding the beneficial ownership of outstanding Brixmor common stock as of March 1, 2018February 12, 2020 by: (1) each person known to us to beneficially own more than 5% of the outstanding voting securities of Brixmor Property Group Inc., (2) each of the named executive officers, (3) each of our directors and (4) all of our directors and executive officers, as a group.

The amounts and percentages of shares beneficially owned are reported on the basis of SEC regulations governing the determination of beneficial ownership of securities. Under SEC rules, a person is deemed to be a “beneficial owner” of a security if that person has or shares voting power or investment power, which includes the power to dispose of or to direct the

disposition of such security. A person is also deemed to be a beneficial owner of any securities of which that person has a right to acquire beneficial ownership within 60 days. Securities that can be so acquired are deemed to be outstanding for purposes of computing such person’s ownership percentage, but not for purposes of computing any other person’s percentage. Under these rules, more than one person may be deemed to be a beneficial owner of the same securities and a person may be deemed to be a beneficial owner of securities as to which such person has no economic interest. Unless otherwise set forth below, the address of each beneficial owner is c/o Brixmor Property Group Inc., 450 Lexington Avenue, New York, New York 10017.
Name of beneficial ownerNumber of
Shares of
Common
Stock
Beneficially
Owned
Percentage of
All Shares of
Common
Stock(1)
Principal Stockholders
The Vanguard Group(2)48,281,62115.9%
Blackrock, Inc.(3)26,237,0968.6%
JPMorgan Chase & Co.(4)20,129,6676.6%
Vanguard Specialized Funds – Vanguard REIT Index Fund(5)20,110,7766.6%
Directors and Named Executive Officers(6):
James M. Taylor Jr.141,521*
John G. Schreiber(7)40,000*
Michael Berman35,475*
Sheryl M. Crosland10,000*
Thomas W. Dickson15,000*
Daniel B. Hurwitz(8)36,478*
William D. Rahm(9)20,000*
Gabrielle Sulzberger16,411*
Angela Aman18,738*
Steven F. Siegel(10)329,039*
Mark Horgan26,765*
Brian T. Finnegan85,854*
Directors and Executive Officers as a Group (13 persons)1,004,956*

Name of Beneficial Owner Number of Shares of Common
Stock Beneficially Owned
   Percentage of All Shares of
Common Stock
(1)
Principal Stockholders       
The Vanguard Group(2)  46,834,140   15.72%
Blackrock, Inc.(3)  34,310,415   11.51%
JPMorgan Chase & Co.(4)  17,840,935   5.99%
        
Directors and Named Executive Officers(5):       
James M. Taylor Jr.  265,615   *
John G. Schreiber(6)  60,000   *
Michael Berman  45,475   *
Sheryl M. Crosland(7)  21,590   *
Julie Bowerman  5,000   *
Thomas W. Dickson  25,000   *
Daniel B. Hurwitz(8)  46,478   *
William D. Rahm  30,000   *
Gabrielle Sulzberger  27,161   *
Angela Aman  54,964   *
Mark Horgan  63,119   *
Brian T. Finnegan  93,978   *
Steven F. Siegel  327,304   *
Directors and Executive Officers as a Group
(14 persons)
  1,295,819   *

*

Less than 1%.

(1)Assumes 298,015,973 shares of our common stock outstanding as of February 12, 2020.

(2)Based solely on a Schedule 13G filed with the SEC on February 11, 2020. The Vanguard Group has sole voting power with respect to 464,401 shares, shared voting power with respect to 340,618 shares, sole dispositive power with respect to 46,379,344 shares and shared dispositive power with respect to 454,796 shares. The Vanguard Group has indicated that it filed the Schedule 13G on behalf of the following subsidiaries: Vanguard Fiduciary Trust Company, which is the beneficial owner of 114,178 shares, and Vanguard Investments Australia, Ltd., which is the beneficial owner of 690,841 shares. The address of The Vanguard Group is 100 Vanguard Blvd., Malvern, PA 19355.

BRIXMOR PROPERTY GROUPï2020 PROXY STATEMENTïPAGE 59

(1)
Assumes 303,851,545 shares of our common stock outstanding as of March 1, 2018.
(2)
Based solely on a Schedule 13G filed with the SEC on February 8, 2018. The Vanguard Group has sole voting power with respect to 594,307 shares, shared voting power with respect to 437,971 shares, sole dispositive power with respect to 47,634,341 shares and shared dispositive power with respect to 647,280 shares. The Vanguard Group has indicated that it filed the Schedule 13G on behalf of the following subsidiaries: Vanguard Fiduciary Trust Company, which is the beneficial owner of 138,109 shares, and Vanguard Investments Australia, Ltd., which is the beneficial owner of 965,369 shares. The address of The Vanguard Group is 100 Vanguard Blvd., Malvern, PA 19355.
43

(3)Based solely on a Schedule 13G filed with the SEC on February 4, 2020. Blackrock, Inc. has sole voting power with respect to 32,982,900 shares and sole dispositive power with respect to 34,310,415 shares. Blackrock, Inc. has indicated that it filed the Schedule 13G on behalf of the following subsidiaries: BlackRock Life Limited; BlackRock International Limited; BlackRock Advisors, LLC; BlackRock (Netherlands) B.V.; BlackRock Fund Advisors; BlackRock Institutional Trust Company, National Association; BlackRock Asset Management Ireland Limited; BlackRock Financial Management, Inc.; BlackRock Japan Co., Ltd.; BlackRock Asset Management Schweiz AG; BlackRock Investment Management, LLC; BlackRock Investment Management (UK) Limited; BlackRock Asset Management Canada Limited; BlackRock Investment Management (Australia) Limited; BlackRock Advisors (UK) Limited; and BlackRock Fund Managers Ltd. The address of Blackrock, Inc. is 55 East 52nd Street, New York, NY 10055.

(4)Based solely on a Schedule 13G filed with the SEC on January 10, 2020. JPMorgan Chase & Co. has sole voting power with respect to 16,095,902 shares and sole dispositive power with respect to 17,831,548 shares. JPMorgan Chase & Co. has indicated that it filed the Schedule 13G on behalf of the following subsidiaries: J.P. Morgan Investment Management Inc.; JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association; JPMorgan Asset Management (UK) Limited; J.P. Morgan Trust Company of Delaware; and J.P. Morgan Securities LLC. The address of JPMorgan Chase & Co. is 270 Park Ave., New York, NY 10017.

(5)Our named executive officers for 2019 were James M. Taylor Jr., Angela Aman, Mark Horgan, Brian T. Finnegan and Steven F. Siegel.

(6)Includes 40,000 shares held by Centaur Partners IV, LP.

(7)Includes 1,590 shares held by husband.

(8)Includes 20,000 shares held by Raider Hill Advisors.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

(3)
Based solely on a Schedule 13G filed with the SEC on January 29, 2018. Blackrock, Inc. has sole voting power with respect to 23,860,630 shares, shared voting power with respect to 0 shares, sole dispositive power with respect to 26,237,096 shares and shared dispositive power with respect to 0 shares. Blackrock, Inc. has indicated that it filed the Schedule 13G on behalf of the following subsidiaries: BlackRock Life Limited; BlackRock International Limited; BlackRock Advisors, LLC; BlackRock (Netherlands) B.V.; BlackRock Institutional Trust Company, National Association; BlackRock Asset Management Ireland Limited; BlackRock Financial Management, Inc.; BlackRock Japan Co Ltd; BlackRock Asset Management Schweiz AG; BlackRock Investment Management, LLC; BlackRock Investment Management (UK) Limited; BlackRock Asset Management Canada Limited; BlackRock (Luxembourg) S.A.; BlackRock Investment Management (Australia) Limited; BlackRock Advisors (UK) Limited; BlackRock Fund Advisors; BlackRock Asset Management North Asia Limited; and BlackRock Fund Managers Ltd. The address of Blackrock, Inc. is 55 East 52ndDELINQUENT SECTION 16(a) REPORTS Street, New York, NY 10055.
(4)
Based solely on a Schedule 13G filed with the SEC on January 18, 2018. JPMorgan Chase & Co. has sole voting power with respect to 18,618,158 shares, shared voting power with respect to 0 shares, sole dispositive power with respect to 20,127,410 shares and shared dispositive power with respect to 205 shares. JPMorgan Chase & Co. has indicated that it filed the Schedule 13G on behalf of the following subsidiaries: J.P. Morgan Investment Management Inc.; JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association; JPMorgan Asset Management (UK) Limited; J.P. Morgan Trust Company of Delaware; and J.P. Morgan Securities LLC. The address of JPMorgan Chase & Co. is 270 Park Ave., New York, NY 10017.
(5)
Based solely on a Schedule 13G filed with the SEC on February 2, 2018. Vanguard Specialized Funds – Vanguard REIT Index Fund has sole voting power with respect to 20,110,776 shares, shared voting power with respect to 0 shares, sole dispositive power with respect to 0 shares and shared dispositive power with respect to 0 shares. The address of Vanguard Specialized Funds – Vanguard REIT Index Fund is 100 Vanguard Blvd., Malvern, PA 19355.
(6)
Our named executive officers for 2017 were James M. Taylor, Angela Aman, Mark Horgan Steven F. Siegel and Brian T. Finnegan.
(7)
Includes 30,000 shares held by Centaur Partners IV, LP.
(8)
Includes 10,000 shares held by Raider Hill Advisors.
(9)
Excludes 1,133,000 shares held by Centerbridge Partners, L.P. and their affiliated entities, where Mr. Rahm is a Senior Managing Director, over all of which Mr. Rahm disclaims beneficial interest.
(10)
Excludes 1,000 shares owned by Mr. Siegel’s adult daughter residing in his home as to which Mr. Siegel disclaims beneficial ownership.
44

Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance

Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act requires executive officers and directors, a company’s chief accounting officer and persons who beneficially own more than 10% of a company’s common stock, to file initial reports of ownership and reports of changes in ownership with the SEC and the NYSE. Executive officers, directors, the chief accounting officer and beneficial owners with more than 10% of our common stock are required by SEC regulations to furnish us with copies of all Section 16(a) forms they file.

Based solely on our review of copies of such reports and written representations from our executive officers directors and Blackstone,directors, we believe that our executive officers and directors and Blackstoneour chief accounting officer filed all reports required by Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act on a timely basis.

basis, except for one report relating to one transaction for Mr. Dickson and one report relating to one transaction for Steven Gallagher, each of which was reported late due to an administrative error.

BRIXMOR PROPERTY GROUPï2020 PROXY STATEMENTïPAGE 60

45

TABLEREVIEW, APPROVAL, OR RATIFICATION OF CONTENTS

Review, Approval, or Ratification of Transactions with Related Persons
TRANSACTIONS WITH RELATED PERSONS

Our Board of Directors recognizes the fact that transactions with related persons present a heightened risk of conflicts of interests and/or improper valuation (or the perception thereof). Our Board of Directors has adopted a written policy on transactions with related persons that is in conformity with the requirements upon issuers having publicly-held common stock that is listed on the NYSE. Under the policy, a “related person” (as defined as in paragraph (a) of Item 404 of Regulation S-K) must promptly disclose to our General Counsel any “related person transaction” (defined as any transaction that is anticipated would be reportable by us under Item 404(a) of Regulation S-K in which we were or are to be a participant and the amount involved exceeds $120,000 and in which any related person had or will have a direct or indirect material interest) and all material facts with respect thereto. The General Counsel will then promptly communicate that information to our boardBoard of directors.Directors. No related person transaction will be executed without the

approval or ratification of our boardBoard of directorsDirectors or a duly authorized committee of our boardBoard of directors.Directors. It is our policy that directors interested in a related person transaction will recuse themselves from any vote on a related person transaction in which they have an interest.

In addition, the related person transaction policy provides that the committee or disinterested directors, as applicable, in connection with any approval or ratification of a related person transaction involving a non-employee director or director nominee, should consider whether such transaction would compromise the director or director nominee’s status as an “independent,” “outside,” or “non-employee” director, as applicable, under our categorical independence standards included in our Corporate Governance Guidelines and the rules and regulations of the SEC, the NYSE and the Internal Revenue Code of 1986.

Related Person Transactions
As discussed above under “Compensation to Officers and Directors—Summary Compensation Table”, pursuant to the employment agreement dated April 12, 2016 between the Company and Mr. Taylor, the Company was contingently obligated to purchase Mr. Taylor’s former residence for an amount equal to the appraised value of the residence as of a date within 120 days of the execution of the employment agreement. Based upon the contingency being triggered in May 2017, the Company purchased the residence on July 5, 2017 for said appraised value of $4.4 million. The Company intends to sell the residence. Based on an August 2017 appraisal, the value of the residence was $3.85 million.

RELATED PERSON TRANSACTIONS

In 2013, we entered into indemnification agreements with our directors and executive officers. These agreements require us to indemnify these individuals

to the fullest extent permitted under Maryland law and our charter against liabilities that may arise by reason of their service to us, and to advance expenses incurred as a result of any proceeding against them as to which they could be indemnified. Insofar as indemnification for liabilities arising under the Securities Act may be permitted to directors or executive officers, we have been informed that in the opinion of the SEC such indemnification is against public policy and is therefore unenforceable.

Except as set forth above, since January 1, 2017,2019, there have been no related person transactions with any director or executive officer of the Company or any other related person, as defined in Rule 404 under Regulation S-K promulgated under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and none is proposed.

BRIXMOR PROPERTY GROUPï2020 PROXY STATEMENTïPAGE 61

46

Equity Compensation Plan Information

>EQUITY COMPENSATION TABLE

The following table sets forth information regarding outstanding options and shares reserved for future issuance under the Company’s equity compensation plans as of December 31, 2017.

Plan categoryNumber of securities
to be
issued upon exercise
of outstanding
options, warrants
and rights
(a)
Weighted-average
exercise price of
outstanding
options, warrants and rights
(b)
Number of securities
remaining available for future
issuance under equity
compensation plans
(excluding securities
reflected in column (a))
(c)
Equity compensation plan approved by security holders1,637,118$12,613,127
Equity compensation
plan not approved
by security holders
Total1,637,11812,613,127
2019.

  Plan Category 

Number of securities to be
issued upon exercise of
outstanding options, warrants
and rights

(a)

  

Weighted-average
exercise price of
outstanding options,
warrants and rights

(b)

  

Number of securities remaining
available for future issuance
under equity compensation
plants (excluding securities
reflected in column (a))

(c)

 
Equity
compensation
plan approved
by security
holders
  3,348,462      10,514,783 
Equity
compensation
plan not
approved by
security holders
         
Total  3,348,462      10,514,783 

BRIXMOR PROPERTY GROUPï2020 PROXY STATEMENTïPAGE 62

47


Stockholder Proposals for the 2019 Annual Meeting

>STOCKHOLDER PROPOSALS FOR THE 2021
ANNUAL MEETING


If any stockholder wishes to propose a matter for consideration at our 20192021 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, the proposal must be mailed to our Secretary, Brixmor Property Group Inc., 450 Lexington Avenue, New York, New York 10017 in accordance with the SEC’s stockholder proposal rule (Rule 14a-8 of the Exchange Act) or the advance notice provisions of our Bylaws. To be eligible under the SEC’s stockholder proposal rule (Rule 14a-8 of the Exchange Act) for inclusion in our 20192021 Annual Meeting proxy statement and form of proxy to be made available in 2019,2021, the proposal must be received by our Corporate Secretary on or before November 26, 2018.16, 2020. Failure to deliver a proposal in accordance with this procedure may result in it not being deemed timely received.

Our bylaws currently provide that, for nominations or other business to be properly brought before an annual meeting by a stockholder, the stockholder must have given timely notice thereof in writing to the secretary of the Company, and, in the case of business other than nominations of persons for election to the Board, such other business must constitute a proper matter for stockholder action. To be timely, a stockholder’s notice shall be delivered to the Secretary of the Company at the principal executive offices of the Company not earlier than the one hundred fiftieth (150th) day nor later than the close of business, Eastern Time, on the one hundred twentieth (120th) day prior to the first anniversary of the date the company’s proxy statement is released to stockholders determined in accordance with Rule 14a-8 promulgated under the Exchange Act, for the preceding year’s annual meeting;meeting, or no earlier than October 17, 2020 or later than November 16, 2020; provided, however, that if the date of the annual meeting is advanced or delayed by more than thirty (30) days

from the first anniversary date of the preceding year’s annual meeting, in order for the notice to be timely, such notice must be so delivered not earlier than the one hundred fiftieth (150th) day prior to the date of such annual meeting and not later than the close of business, Eastern Time, on the later of the one hundred twentieth (120th) day prior to the date of such annual meeting, as originally convened, or the tenth (10th) day following the day on which public announcement of the date of such meeting is first made. Public announcement of an adjournment or postponement of an annual meeting shall not commence a new time period for the giving of a stockholder’s notice. Notwithstanding the foregoing, if the number of directors to be elected to the Board of Directors in increased, and there is no public announcement of such action at least one hundred thirty (130) days prior to the first anniversary of the date the company’s proxy statement is released to stockholders for the preceding year’s annual meeting, a stockholder’s notice will be considered timely, but only with respect to nominees for any new positions created by such increase, if it is delivered to the secretary of the Company at the principal executive offices of the Company not later than 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time on the tenth (10th) day following the day on which such public announcement is first made by the Company.

A stockholder’s notice must contain certain information specified by our bylaws about the stockholder, its affiliates and any proposed business or nominee for election as a director, including information about the economic interest of the stockholder, its affiliates and any proposed nominee in us.

BRIXMOR PROPERTY GROUPï2020 PROXY STATEMENTïPAGE 63

48

Householding of Proxy Materials

>HOUSEHOLDING OF PROXY MATERIALS

SEC rules permit companies and intermediaries such as brokers to satisfy the delivery requirements for proxy statements and notices with respect to two or more stockholders sharing the same address by delivering a single proxy statement or a single notice addressed to those stockholders. This process, which is commonly referred to as “householding,” provides cost savings for companies. Some brokers household proxy materials, delivering a single proxy statement or notice to multiple stockholders sharing an address unless contrary instructions have been received from the affected stockholders. Once you have received notice from your broker, bank or other nominee that

it will be householding materials to your address, householding will continue until you are notified otherwise or until you revoke your consent. If, at any time, you no longer wish to participate in householding and would prefer to receive a separate proxy statement or notice, or if your household is receiving multiple copies of these documents and you wish to request that future deliveries be limited to a single copy, please notify your broker, bank or other nominee. You can also request prompt delivery of a copy of the proxy statement and annual report by contacting our Corporate Secretary at 450 Lexington Avenue, New York, New York 10017, (212) 869-3000.
49

Other Business

>OTHER BUSINESS

The Board does not know of any other matters that may be properly brought before the meeting. If other matters are presented, the proxy holders have discretionary authority to vote all proxies in accordance with their best judgment.

By Order of the Board of Directors,

Steven F. Siegel

Secretary

We make available, free of charge on our website, all of our filings that are made electronically with the SEC, including Forms 10-K, 10-Q and 8-K. To access

these filings, go to our website (www.brixmor.com) and click on “Financial Information” under the “Investors” heading. Copies of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2017,2019, including financial statements and schedules thereto, filed with the SEC, are also available without charge to stockholders upon written request addressed to:

Secretary

Brixmor Property Group Inc.

450 Lexington Avenue

New York, New York 10017

BRIXMOR PROPERTY GROUPï2020 PROXY STATEMENTïPAGE 64

>GENERAL INFORMATION

Why am I being provided with these materials?

We have made these proxy materials available to you via the Internet or, upon your request, have delivered printed versions of these proxy materials to you by mail in connection with the solicitation by the Board of Directors (the “Board”) of Brixmor Property Group Inc., a Maryland corporation (the “Company”), of proxies to be voted at our Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held on April 28, 2020 (“Annual Meeting”), and at any postponements or adjournments of the Annual Meeting. Directors, officers and other Company employees also may solicit proxies by telephone or otherwise. Brokers, banks and other nominees will be requested to solicit proxies or authorizations from beneficial owners and will be reimbursed for their reasonable expenses. You are invited to attend the Annual Meeting and vote your shares. The Annual Meeting will be a virtual meeting of stockholders, and will be held at 9:00 a.m. Eastern Daylight Time via live webcast. For instructions on how to access the live webcast and attend the virtual Annual Meeting, see “How do I attend and vote shares at the Annual Meeting?”

What am I voting on?

There are four proposals to be considered and voted on at the Annual Meeting:

·Proposal No. 1:  Election of nine directors to serve until our next annual meeting and until their successors are duly elected and qualify.
·Proposal No. 2:  Ratification of the appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for 2020.
·Proposal No. 3:  Approval, on a non-binding advisory basis, of the compensation paid to our named executive officers, as described in this proxy statement.
·Proposal No. 4:  Determination, on a non-binding advisory basis, of the frequency of future non-binding advisory votes to approve the compensation paid to our named executive officers.

Who is entitled to vote?

Stockholders as of the close of business on February 12, 2020 (the “Record Date”), may vote at the Annual Meeting, or any postponement or adjournment thereof. As of that date, there were 298,015,973 shares of common stock outstanding. You have one vote for each share of common stock held by you as of the Record Date, including shares:

·Held directly in your name as “stockholder of record” (also referred to as “registered stockholder”);
·Held for you in an account with a broker, bank or other nominee (shares held in “street name”). Street name holders generally cannot vote their shares directly and instead must instruct the broker, bank or other nominee how to vote their shares; and
·Held for you by us as restricted shares (whether vested or non-vested) under any of our stock incentive plans.

BRIXMOR PROPERTY GROUPï2020 PROXY STATEMENTïPAGE 65

Why are you holding a virtual Annual Meeting?

Due to the emerging public health impact of the coronavirus outbreak (COVID-19) and to support the health and well-being of our stockholders, this year’s Annual Meeting will be held in a virtual meeting format only. We have designed our virtual format to enhance, rather than constrain, stockholder access, participation and communication. For example, the virtual format allows stockholders to communicate with us in advance of, and during, the Annual Meeting so they can ask questions of our board of directors or management. Just like we did during our in-person meetings, during the live Q&A session of the Annual Meeting, we may answer questions as they come in and address those asked in advance, to the extent relevant to the business of the Annual Meeting, as time permits.

How do I attend and vote shares at the virtual Annual Meeting?

The Annual Meeting will convene at 9:00 a.m. Eastern Daylight Time on April 28, 2020. In order to participate in the 2020 Annual Meeting live via the Internet, you must register atwww.viewproxy.com/brixmor/2020 by 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time on April 26, 2020. If you are a registered holder, you must register using the virtual control number included on your Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials or your proxy card (if you received a printed copy of the proxy materials). If you hold your shares beneficially through a bank or broker, you must provide a legal proxy from your bank or broker during registration and you will be assigned a virtual control number in order to vote your shares during the 2020 Annual Meeting. If you are unable to obtain a legal proxy to vote your shares, you will still be able to attend the 2020 Annual Meeting (but will not be able to vote your shares) so long as you demonstrate proof of stock ownership. Instructions on how to connect and participate via the Internet, including how to demonstrate proof of stock ownership, are posted atwww.viewproxy.com/brixmor/2020.

On the day of the Annual Meeting, if you have properly registered, you may enter the Annual Meeting by logging in using the password you received via email in your registration confirmation atwww.viewproxy.com/brixmor/2020.

If you encounter any difficulties accessing the Annual Meeting live audio webcast during the meeting time, please email VirtualMeeting@viewproxy.com or call 1-800-574-6504.

Even if you plan to attend the live webcast of the Annual Meeting, we encourage you to vote in advance by Internet, telephone or mail so that your vote will be counted even if you later decide not to attend the virtual Annual Meeting. We will provide a physical location to view the webcast if requested by a stockholder in writing by contacting the Secretary at Brixmor Property Group Inc., 450 Lexington Avenue, New York, New York 10017. Please note that no members of management or the Board will be in attendance at the physical location.

A replay of the meeting, as well as any questions pertinent to meeting matters and management’s answers (including any questions that could not be answered during the meeting due to time constraints), will be made publicly available on our investor relations website promptly after the virtual annual meeting.

BRIXMOR PROPERTY GROUPï2020 PROXY STATEMENTïPAGE 66

50

What constitutes a quorum?

The presence in person via attendance at the virtual Annual Meeting or by proxy of stockholders entitled to cast a majority of all the votes entitled to be cast at the Annual Meeting on any matter will constitute a quorum to transact business at the Annual Meeting. Stockholders who properly authorize a proxy but who instruct their proxy holder to abstain from voting on one or more matters are counted as present and entitled to vote for purposes of determining a quorum. Shares represented by “broker non-votes,” described below, also are counted as present and entitled to vote for purposes of determining a quorum. However, as described below under “How are votes counted?,” if you hold your shares in street name and do not provide voting instructions to your broker, bank or other nominee, your shares will not be voted on any proposal on which your broker, bank or other nominee does not have discretionary authority to vote (a “broker non-vote”).

What is a “broker non-vote”?

A broker non-vote occurs when shares held by a broker, bank or other nominee are not voted with respect to a proposal because (1) the broker, bank or other nominee has not received voting instructions from the stockholder who beneficially owns the shares and (2) the broker, bank or other nominee lacks the authority to vote the shares at his or her discretion. Under current NYSE interpretations that govern broker non-votes, Proposal Nos. 1, 3 and 4 are considered non-discretionary matters and a broker, bank or other nominee will lack the authority to vote shares at his or her discretion on such proposals. Proposal No. 2 is considered a discretionary matter and a broker, bank or other nominee will be permitted to exercise his or her discretion.

How many votes are required to approve each proposal?

The affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast will be required to approve each of the proposals. If no option in the advisory vote on the frequency of stockholder votes on executive compensation (Proposal No. 4) receives a majority of votes cast, the option that receives the most votes will be considered the stockholders’ preferred frequency. While the vote on executive compensation (Proposal No. 3) and vote on the frequency of stockholder votes on executive compensation (Proposal No. 4) are advisory in nature and non-binding, the Board will review the voting results and expects to take them into consideration when making future decisions regarding executive compensation and the frequency of stockholder votes on executive compensation.

How are votes counted?

You may instruct your proxy to vote “FOR” or “AGAINST” or to “ABSTAIN” with respect to the election of directors (Proposal No. 1), ratification of the appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for 2020 (Proposal No. 2) and the advisory vote on the compensation paid to our named executive officers (Proposal No. 3). With respect to the advisory vote on the frequency of stockholder votes on executive compensation (Proposal No. 4), you may instruct your proxy to vote every “ONE YEAR,” “TWO YEARS” or “THREE YEARS” or to “ABSTAIN.” Abstentions and broker non-votes will have no effect on the outcome of the proposals.

BRIXMOR PROPERTY GROUPï2020 PROXY STATEMENTïPAGE 67

If you properly authorize a proxy (whether by internet, telephone or mail) without specifying voting instructions on any matter to be considered at the Annual Meeting, the proxy holders will vote your shares according to the Board’s recommendation on that matter and in accordance with the discretion of the holders of the proxy with respect to any other matters that may be brought before the Annual Meeting. The Board has recommended a vote “FOR” each director nominee listed herein and “FOR” Proposal Nos. 2 and 3 and “ONE YEAR” with respect to Proposal No. 4.

Who will count the vote?

Representatives of Alliance Advisors will tabulate the votes, and representatives of Alliance Advisors will serve as inspectors of election.

How does the Board recommend that I vote?

Our Board recommends that you vote your shares:

·“FOR” each of the nominees for election as directors set forth in this proxy statement.
·“FOR” the ratification of the appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for 2020.
·“FOR” the approval, on a non-binding, advisory basis, of the compensation paid to our named executive officers, as described in this proxy statement.
·For every “ONE YEAR,” on a non-binding, advisory basis, with respect to how frequently a non-binding stockholder vote to approve the compensation paid to our named executive officers should occur.

How do I authorize a proxy to vote my shares without attending the virtual Annual Meeting?

If you are a stockholder of record, you may authorize a proxy to vote on your behalf at the Annual Meeting. Specifically, you may authorize a proxy:

·By Internet—If you have Internet access, you may authorize your proxy by going towww.AALvote.com/BRX and by following the instructions on how to complete an electronic proxy card. You will need the virtual control number included on your Notice of Internet Availability or proxy card in order to vote online.
·By Telephone—If you have access to a touch-tone telephone, you may authorize your proxy by dialing 1-866-804-9616 and by following the recorded instructions. You will need the virtual control number included on your Notice of Internet Availability or proxy card in order to vote by telephone.
·By Mail—If you have requested or received a paper copy of the proxy materials by mail, you may authorize your proxy by mail by completing, signing and dating the enclosed proxy card where indicated and by mailing or otherwise returning the card in the envelope that has been provided to you. You should sign your name exactly as it appears on the proxy card. If you are signing in a representative capacity (for example, as guardian, executor, trustee, custodian, attorney or officer of a corporation), indicate your name and title or capacity.

If you hold your shares in street name, you may submit voting instructions to your broker, bank or other nominee. In most instances, you will be able to do this over the Internet, by telephoneor by mail. Please refer to information from your broker, bank, or other nominee on how to submit voting instructions.

BRIXMOR PROPERTY GROUPï2020 PROXY STATEMENTïPAGE 68

Internet and telephone voting facilities will close at 11:59 p.m. on April 27, 2020 for the voting of shares held by stockholders of record or held in street name.

Mailed proxy cards with respect to shares held of record or in street name must be received no later than April 27, 2020.

What does it mean if I receive more than one Notice on or about the same time?

It generally means you hold shares registered in more than one account. To ensure that all your shares are voted, please sign and return each proxy card or, if you authorize a proxy by Internet or telephone, vote once for each Notice you receive.

May I change my vote or revoke my proxy?

Yes. Whether you have authorized a proxy by Internet, telephone or mail, if you are a stockholder of record, you may change your voting instructions or revoke your proxy by:

·Sending a written statement to that effect to our Corporate Secretary, provided such statement is received no later than April 27, 2020;
·Authorizing a proxy again by Internet or telephone at a later time before the closing of those voting facilities at 11:59 p.m. on April 27, 2020;
·Submitting a properly signed proxy card with a later date that is received no later than April 27, 2020; or
·Attending the Annual Meeting, revoking your proxy and voting during the live webcast.

If you hold shares in street name, you may submit new voting instructions by contacting your broker, bank or other nominee. You may also change your vote or revoke your proxy during the live webcast of the Annual Meeting if you obtain a signed proxy from the record holder (broker, bank or other nominee) giving you the right to vote the shares.

BRIXMOR PROPERTY GROUPï2020 PROXY STATEMENTïPAGE 69

Could other matters be decided at the Annual Meeting?

At the date this proxy statement went to press, we did not know of any matters that may be properly presented at the Annual Meeting other than those referred to in this proxy statement.

If other matters are properly presented at the Annual Meeting for consideration and you are a stockholder of record and have submitted a proxy card, the persons named in your proxy card will have the discretion to vote on those matters for you.

Who will pay for the cost of this proxy solicitation?

We will pay the cost of soliciting proxies. Proxies may be solicited on our behalf by directors, officers or employees (for no additional compensation) in person or by telephone, electronic transmission and facsimile transmission. Brokers, banks and other nominees will be requested to solicit proxies or authorizations from beneficial owners and will be reimbursed for their reasonable expenses.

BRIXMOR PROPERTY GROUPï2020 PROXY STATEMENTïPAGE 70

>APPENDIX

DEFINITIONS AND RECONCILIATIONS OF CONTENTSNON-GAAP PERFORMANCE MEASURES

The Company presents the non-GAAP performance measures set forth below. These measures should not be considered as alternatives to, or more meaningful than, net income (calculated in accordance with GAAP) or other GAAP financial measures, as an indicator of financial performance and are not alternatives to, or more meaningful than, cash flow from operating activities (calculated in accordance with GAAP) as a measure of liquidity. Non-GAAP performance measures have limitations as they do not include all items of income and expense that affect operations, and accordingly, should always be considered as supplemental financial results to those calculated in accordance with GAAP. The Company’s computation of these non-GAAP performance measures may differ in certain respects from the methodology utilized by other REITs and, therefore, may not be comparable to similarly titled measures presented by such other REITs. Investors are cautioned that items excluded from these non-GAAP performance measures are relevant to understanding and addressing financial performance. A reconciliation of these non-GAAP performance measures to net income is presented in the attached table.

Same Property NOISame Property NOI is a supplemental, non-GAAP performance measure utilized to evaluate the operating performance of real estate companies. Same Property NOI is calculated (using properties owned for the entirety of both periods and excluding properties under development and completed new development properties which have been stabilized for less than one year) as total property revenues (base rent, expense reimbursements, adjustments for revenues deemed uncollectible, ancillary and other rental income, percentage rents and other revenues) less direct property operating expenses (operating costs, real estate taxes and provision for doubtful accounts). Same Property NOI excludes (i) corporate level expenses (including general and administrative), (ii) lease termination fees, (iii) straight-line rental income, net, (iv) accretion of above- and below-market leases and tenant inducements, net, (v) straight-line ground rent expense, and (vi) income / expense associated with the Company’s captive insurance company. Considering the nature of its business as a real estate owner and operator, the Company believes that Same Property NOI is useful to investors in measuring the operating performance of its property portfolio because the definition excludes various items included in net income that do not relate to, or are not indicative of, the operating performance of the Company’s properties, such as depreciation and amortization and corporate level expenses (including general and administrative), and because it eliminates disparities in NOI due to the acquisition or disposition of properties or the stabilization of completed new development properties during the period presented and therefore provides a more consistent metric for comparing the operating performance of the Company's real estate between periods.

BRIXMOR PROPERTY GROUPï2020 PROXY STATEMENTïPAGE A-1

SAME PROPERTY NOI RECONCILIATION

Unaudited, dollars in thousands

  Twelve Months Ended
  12/31/19 12/31/18
Reconciliation of Net Income to Same Property NOI
Same Property NOI  $803,357  $776,677
Adjustments:      
Non-same property NOI  27,193  91,757
Lease termination fees  3,314  3,672
Straight-line rental income, net  23,427  15,352
Accretion of above- and below-market leases and tenant inducements, net  15,230  23,313
Straight-line ground rent expense  (127)  (131)
Depreciation and amortization  (332,431)  (352,245)
Impairment of real estate assets  (24,402)  (53,295)
General and administrative  (102,309)  (93,596)
Total other expense  (138,479)  (45,220)
Net income  $274,773  $366,284

BRIXMOR PROPERTY GROUPï2020 PROXY STATEMENTïPAGE A-2

[MISSING IMAGE: tv488643_proxy1.jpg]

 

[MISSING IMAGE: tv488643_proxy2.jpg]